F Brown1, G Fry, A Cawood, R Stratton. 1. Fiona Brown, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, Gloucester GL51 7AN Tel:(+44) 0300 422 3460: Email fiona.brown1@nhs.net.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Malnutrition is a common and significant public health problem, especially for older adults, as the consequences are costly. National guidelines (NICE CG32/QS24) highlight the need to identify and manage malnutrition, the implementation of which was deemed "high impact to produce cost savings". The 'Malnutrition Pathway', endorsed by NICE and other professional bodies, is a practical evidence-based guide to help community healthcare professionals (HCP) to implement guidance on malnutrition management. Published evaluations of its use are needed. DESIGN: This service evaluation in older adults assessed the impact of implementing the 'Malnutrition Pathway' on health care use and costs, as well as the acceptability of the management strategies and effect on malnutrition risk. SETTING: 5 GP surgeries in Gloucestershire. PARTICIPANTS: 163 older adults (80±9 years) with a range of primary diagnoses, living in their own home, were screened using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool ('MUST') (n50 low risk (LR); n41 medium risk (MR); n72 high risk (HR)). All patients were managed according to risk (LR: no further management; MR: dietary advice (DA); and HR: DA plus two oral nutritional supplements (ONS) (1 serve 300kcal, 18g protein; 125ml). MEASUREMENTS: At each review (6weeks, 3 and 6 months), 'MUST' score, compliance and satisfaction to their management plan were recorded. Healthcare use was collected from GP records 6 months before and after implementation of the pathway. A simple cost analysis was completed. RESULTS: Implementing appropriate management of malnutrition led to significant reductions in hospital admissions (p=0.028), length of hospital stay (p=0.05), GP visits (p=0.007) and antibiotic prescriptions (p=0.05). Over 6 months, the costs to manage malnutrition (HCP time, ONS) were more than offset by the savings associated with these reductions in health care use (per patient savings of -£395.64 MR+HR; -£997.02 HR). The proportion of individuals at risk of malnutrition reduced over time, and patients reported being satisfied with the DA (97%) and ONS (96%), consuming 90% of their ONS prescription. CONCLUSION: Managing malnutrition significantly reduces healthcare use, with a positive budget impact, in older malnourished patients in primary care. This represents an opportunity to improve patient care with benefit on health care spend.
OBJECTIVES: Malnutrition is a common and significant public health problem, especially for older adults, as the consequences are costly. National guidelines (NICE CG32/QS24) highlight the need to identify and manage malnutrition, the implementation of which was deemed "high impact to produce cost savings". The 'Malnutrition Pathway', endorsed by NICE and other professional bodies, is a practical evidence-based guide to help community healthcare professionals (HCP) to implement guidance on malnutrition management. Published evaluations of its use are needed. DESIGN: This service evaluation in older adults assessed the impact of implementing the 'Malnutrition Pathway' on health care use and costs, as well as the acceptability of the management strategies and effect on malnutrition risk. SETTING: 5 GP surgeries in Gloucestershire. PARTICIPANTS: 163 older adults (80±9 years) with a range of primary diagnoses, living in their own home, were screened using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool ('MUST') (n50 low risk (LR); n41 medium risk (MR); n72 high risk (HR)). All patients were managed according to risk (LR: no further management; MR: dietary advice (DA); and HR: DA plus two oral nutritional supplements (ONS) (1 serve 300kcal, 18g protein; 125ml). MEASUREMENTS: At each review (6weeks, 3 and 6 months), 'MUST' score, compliance and satisfaction to their management plan were recorded. Healthcare use was collected from GP records 6 months before and after implementation of the pathway. A simple cost analysis was completed. RESULTS: Implementing appropriate management of malnutrition led to significant reductions in hospital admissions (p=0.028), length of hospital stay (p=0.05), GP visits (p=0.007) and antibiotic prescriptions (p=0.05). Over 6 months, the costs to manage malnutrition (HCP time, ONS) were more than offset by the savings associated with these reductions in health care use (per patient savings of -£395.64 MR+HR; -£997.02 HR). The proportion of individuals at risk of malnutrition reduced over time, and patients reported being satisfied with the DA (97%) and ONS (96%), consuming 90% of their ONS prescription. CONCLUSION: Managing malnutrition significantly reduces healthcare use, with a positive budget impact, in older malnourished patients in primary care. This represents an opportunity to improve patient care with benefit on health care spend.
Entities:
Keywords:
Malnutrition; dietary advice; general practice; oral nutritional supplements; pathway
Authors: Kurt Hong; Suela Sulo; William Wang; Susan Kim; Laura Huettner; Rose Taroyan; Kirk W Kerr; Carolyn Kaloostian Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2021 Jan-Dec
Authors: Liz Payne; Daniela Ghio; Elisabeth Grey; Joanna Slodkowska-Barabasz; Philine Harris; Michelle Sutcliffe; Sue Green; Helen C Roberts; Caroline Childs; Sian Robinson; Bernard Gudgin; Pam Holloway; Jo Kelly; Kathy Wallis; Oliver Dean; Paul Aveyard; Paramjit Gill; Mike Stroud; Paul Little; Lucy Yardley; Leanne Morrison Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2021-11-11 Impact factor: 2.497