Janet C Lindow1, Jennifer L Hughes2, Charles South3, Abu Minhajuddin4, Luis Gutierrez2, Elizabeth Bannister5, Madhukar H Trivedi2, Matthew J Byerly5. 1. Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Center for Mental Health Research and Recovery, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana. Electronic address: jlindow@email.arizona.edu. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. 3. Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Clinical Science, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. 4. Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. 5. Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Center for Mental Health Research and Recovery, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Suicide is a leading cause of death among U.S. youth aged 12-18 years. Youth Aware of Mental Health (YAM), a promising, universal, school-based mental health promotion/suicide primary prevention intervention for adolescents, has been evaluated in Europe but not in the U.S. The present study used an uncontrolled, pretest/post-test design to document the potential for YAM to reduce suicidal ideation, attempt, and suicide. A demonstration that help seeking behaviors, mental health literacy, and mental health stigmatizing attitudes improve after the intervention would suggest that the program is promising in the U.S., as well as in Europe, and that further investigation is merited. METHODS: YAM was delivered to 1,878 students in 11 schools as part of regular school curricula. A subset of these students (n = 436) completed surveys before and 3 months postdelivery. Surveys included five questions about help seeking behaviors, a measure of intent to seek help (General Help Seeking Questionnaire), two mental health literacy scales, and two mental illness stigma scales (Reported and Intended Behavior Scale and Personal Stigma and Social Distance Scale). Both McNemar's test and repeated measures linear models were used to determine whether the survey outcomes changed after YAM delivery. RESULTS: Among the 436 adolescents (286 and 150 in Montana and Texas, respectively), significant increases were found pre- to post-intervention in three of five help seeking behaviors, along with improved mental health literacy and decreased mental health-related stigma. Intent to seek help was unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Several help seeking behavioral factors, mental health knowledge, and stigma improved post-YAM intervention. All three domains are likely protective against suicide. A randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of YAM in preventing suicidal behaviors is warranted.
PURPOSE: Suicide is a leading cause of death among U.S. youth aged 12-18 years. Youth Aware of Mental Health (YAM), a promising, universal, school-based mental health promotion/suicide primary prevention intervention for adolescents, has been evaluated in Europe but not in the U.S. The present study used an uncontrolled, pretest/post-test design to document the potential for YAM to reduce suicidal ideation, attempt, and suicide. A demonstration that help seeking behaviors, mental health literacy, and mental health stigmatizing attitudes improve after the intervention would suggest that the program is promising in the U.S., as well as in Europe, and that further investigation is merited. METHODS: YAM was delivered to 1,878 students in 11 schools as part of regular school curricula. A subset of these students (n = 436) completed surveys before and 3 months postdelivery. Surveys included five questions about help seeking behaviors, a measure of intent to seek help (General Help Seeking Questionnaire), two mental health literacy scales, and two mental illness stigma scales (Reported and Intended Behavior Scale and Personal Stigma and Social Distance Scale). Both McNemar's test and repeated measures linear models were used to determine whether the survey outcomes changed after YAM delivery. RESULTS: Among the 436 adolescents (286 and 150 in Montana and Texas, respectively), significant increases were found pre- to post-intervention in three of five help seeking behaviors, along with improved mental health literacy and decreased mental health-related stigma. Intent to seek help was unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Several help seeking behavioral factors, mental health knowledge, and stigma improved post-YAM intervention. All three domains are likely protective against suicide. A randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of YAM in preventing suicidal behaviors is warranted.
Keywords:
Adolescents; Help seeking behaviors; Mental health literacy; Stigma; Suicide; Suicide prevention intervention; YAM; Youth aware of mental health
Authors: Peter A Wyman; C Hendricks Brown; Mark LoMurray; Karen Schmeelk-Cone; Mariya Petrova; Qin Yu; Erin Walsh; Xin Tu; Wei Wang Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-07-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Danuta Wasserman; Christina W Hoven; Camilla Wasserman; Melanie Wall; Ruth Eisenberg; Gergö Hadlaczky; Ian Kelleher; Marco Sarchiapone; Alan Apter; Judit Balazs; Julio Bobes; Romuald Brunner; Paul Corcoran; Doina Cosman; Francis Guillemin; Christian Haring; Miriam Iosue; Michael Kaess; Jean-Pierre Kahn; Helen Keeley; George J Musa; Bogdan Nemes; Vita Postuvan; Pilar Saiz; Stella Reiter-Theil; Airi Varnik; Peeter Varnik; Vladimir Carli Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-01-09 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Janet C Lindow; Jennifer L Hughes; Charles South; Luis Gutierrez; Elizabeth Bannister; Madhukar H Trivedi; Matthew J Byerly Journal: Arch Suicide Res Date: 2019-07-04
Authors: Danuta Wasserman; Vladimir Carli; Camilla Wasserman; Alan Apter; Judit Balazs; Julia Bobes; Renata Bracale; Romuald Brunner; Cendrine Bursztein-Lipsicas; Paul Corcoran; Doina Cosman; Tony Durkee; Dana Feldman; Julia Gadoros; Francis Guillemin; Christian Haring; Jean-Pierre Kahn; Michael Kaess; Helen Keeley; Dragan Marusic; Bogdan Nemes; Vita Postuvan; Stella Reiter-Theil; Franz Resch; Pilar Sáiz; Marco Sarchiapone; Merike Sisask; Airi Varnik; Christina W Hoven Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-04-13 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Peter A Wyman; C Hendricks Brown; Jeff Inman; Wendi Cross; Karen Schmeelk-Cone; Jing Guo; Juan B Pena Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2008-02
Authors: Anthony R Pisani; Karen Schmeelk-Cone; Douglas Gunzler; Mariya Petrova; David B Goldston; Xin Tu; Peter A Wyman Journal: J Youth Adolesc Date: 2012-05-06
Authors: Laura M Hart; Amy J Morgan; Alyssia Rossetto; Claire M Kelly; Andrew Mackinnon; Anthony F Jorm Journal: Aust N Z J Psychiatry Date: 2018-02-08 Impact factor: 5.744
Authors: Victoria Williamson; Michael Larkin; Tessa Reardon; Samantha Pearcey; Roberta Button; Iheoma Green; Claire Hill; Paul Stallard; Susan H Spence; Maria Breen; Ian Mcdonald; Obioha Ukoumunne; Tamsin Ford; Mara Violato; Falko Sniehotta; Jason Stainer; Alastair Gray; Paul Brown; Michelle Sancho; Fran Morgan; Bec Jasper; Cathy Creswell Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-06-21 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Isaac Daniel Amado-Rodríguez; Rocio Casañas; Laia Mas-Expósito; Pere Castellví; Juan Francisco Roldan-Merino; Irma Casas; Lluís Lalucat-Jo; Mª Isabel Fernández-San Martín Journal: Children (Basel) Date: 2022-03-31
Authors: Lindy Beukema; Janne M Tullius; Lies Korevaar; Jacomijn Hofstra; Sijmen A Reijneveld; Andrea F de Winter Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-20 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Chia-Min Lu; Yin-Ju Lien; Hsing-Jung Chao; Hui-Shin Lin; I-Chuan Tsai Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-16 Impact factor: 3.390