Literature DB >> 32115220

Clinical efficacy of methods for bonding to zirconia: A systematic review.

Niall P Quigley1, Denice S S Loo2, Clinton Choy2, William N Ha3.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The polycrystalline nature of zirconia hinders its ability to bond to tooth structure. Consequently, durable bonding to zirconia has been challenging. In vitro studies have evaluated various methods of bonding to zirconia, but clinical data are sparse.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to critically appraise clinical studies investigating the survival rate of resin-bonded zirconia fixed partial dentures (FPDs), inlay-retained zirconia FPDs, and zirconia veneers.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Searches were performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Clinical studies of over 12 months duration involving bonded zirconia restorations between 1990 and July 2018 were reviewed. All suitable studies were assessed for quality by using a "Questionnaire for selecting articles on Dental Prostheses".
RESULTS: Eight studies were ultimately included. Three studies examined posterior inlay-retained FPDs with estimated survival rates of 12.1% at 10 years, 95.8% at 5 years, and 100% at 20 months. Five studies reviewed anterior, resin-bonded FPDs, all of which had a 3- to 10-year survival rate of 100%. Debonds occurred in all studies, but the prostheses could usually be rebonded.
CONCLUSIONS: With correctly designed buccal and lingual coverage retainers and minimal if any veneering porcelain, zirconia-based, posterior, inlay-retained FPDs seem to have a high clinical survival rate. The role of bonding efficacy in this survival rate is unknown. Anterior, cantilevered, resin-bonded zirconia FPDs seem to have a high clinical survival rate. While these prostheses can debond, fracture of the entire prosthesis is unlikely, so they may be rebonded. To bond zirconia, the use of airborne-particle abrasion with 50-μm alumina (Al2O3) at 0.1 to 0.25 MPa in combination with a phosphate monomer-containing adhesive resin is recommended until further studies become available. Dental dam isolation is also recommended during zirconia bonding.
Copyright © 2020 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32115220     DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.12.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  6 in total

1.  Effect of cementation techniques on fracture load of monolithic zirconia crowns.

Authors:  Janne Angen Indergård; Anneli Skjold; Christian Schriwer; Marit Øilo
Journal:  Biomater Investig Dent       Date:  2021-10-20

2.  Shear bond strength of resin bonded zirconia and lithium disilicate - effect of surface treatment of ceramics and dentin.

Authors:  Mina Aker Sagen; Linda Vos; Jon E Dahl; Hans J Rønold
Journal:  Biomater Investig Dent       Date:  2022-02-16

3.  10-Methacryloyloxydecyl Dihydrogen Phosphate (10-MDP)-Containing Cleaner Improves Bond Strength to Contaminated Monolithic Zirconia: An In-Vitro Study.

Authors:  Mohamed M Awad; Feras Alhalabi; Khaled Mosfer Alzahrani; Majed Almutiri; Fawaz Alqanawi; Lafi Albdiri; Abdullah Alshehri; Ali Alrahlah; Mohammed H Ahmed
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  A comprehensive in vitro study on the performance of two different strategies to simplify adhesive bonding.

Authors:  Nadja Rohr; Sabrina Märtin; Nicola U Zitzmann; Jens Fischer
Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 3.040

5.  Effect of Luting Cement and Convergence Angle of the Preparation on the Internal Fit of Zirconia Restorations.

Authors:  Andrés Sánchez-Monescillo; Carlos González-Serrano; José González-Serrano; João Malta Barbosa; Carlos López-Suárez; Sillas Duarte
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 6.  Clinical performance of resin-matrix ceramic partial coverage restorations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hanan Fathy; Hamdi H Hamama; Noha El-Wassefy; Salah H Mahmoud
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.606

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.