Marina V Pryzhkova1, Philip W Jordan2. 1. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. 2. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. pjordan8@jhu.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Human testicular cells are greatly valuable to the research community as tools for studying testicular physiology and the effects of environmental pollutants. Because adult testicular cells have a limited self-organization capacity and life span, we investigated whether human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) can be used together with testicular cells to move a step closer toward making an optimal model of the human testis. METHODS: We used in vitro culture of donor testicular cells under serum-containing and chemically defined conditions. CRISPR-Cas9 technology was applied to introduce fluorescent transgenes (mCherry2 and EGFP) into hPSCs and testicular cells. hPSC-derived spheroids were co-cultured with human testicular cells in mini-spin bioreactors. RESULTS: Traditional cell culture conditions used for maintenance of testicular somatic cells generally contain serum and pose limitations on evaluating the role of active molecules on cell functions. We established that chemically defined culture conditions can be used to maintain testicular cells without the loss of proliferative activity. These cultures demonstrate marker expression which is characteristic of common testicular cell types: Sertoli, Leydig, endothelial, myoid cells, and macrophages. In order to model testicular physiology, it is important to be able to perform live cell microscopy. Thus, we generated fluorescent protein-expressing human testicular cells and hPSCs and demonstrated that these cell types can be successfully co-cultured for prolonged periods of time in a three-dimensional microenvironment. CONCLUSION: Our research extends the possible applications of human testis-derived somatic cells and shows that they can be used together with hPSCs for further studies of human male reproductive biology.
BACKGROUND:Human testicular cells are greatly valuable to the research community as tools for studying testicular physiology and the effects of environmental pollutants. Because adult testicular cells have a limited self-organization capacity and life span, we investigated whether human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) can be used together with testicular cells to move a step closer toward making an optimal model of the human testis. METHODS: We used in vitro culture of donor testicular cells under serum-containing and chemically defined conditions. CRISPR-Cas9 technology was applied to introduce fluorescent transgenes (mCherry2 and EGFP) into hPSCs and testicular cells. hPSC-derived spheroids were co-cultured with human testicular cells in mini-spin bioreactors. RESULTS: Traditional cell culture conditions used for maintenance of testicular somatic cells generally contain serum and pose limitations on evaluating the role of active molecules on cell functions. We established that chemically defined culture conditions can be used to maintain testicular cells without the loss of proliferative activity. These cultures demonstrate marker expression which is characteristic of common testicular cell types: Sertoli, Leydig, endothelial, myoid cells, and macrophages. In order to model testicular physiology, it is important to be able to perform live cell microscopy. Thus, we generated fluorescent protein-expressing human testicular cells and hPSCs and demonstrated that these cell types can be successfully co-cultured for prolonged periods of time in a three-dimensional microenvironment. CONCLUSION: Our research extends the possible applications of human testis-derived somatic cells and shows that they can be used together with hPSCs for further studies of human male reproductive biology.
Entities:
Keywords:
Genetic modification; Human pluripotent stem cells; Human testicular cells; Mini-spin bioreactor; Organoids
Authors: Charles A Easley; Bart T Phillips; Megan M McGuire; Jennifer M Barringer; Hanna Valli; Brian P Hermann; Calvin R Simerly; Aleksander Rajkovic; Toshio Miki; Kyle E Orwig; Gerald P Schatten Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2012-08-23 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Xuyu Qian; Ha Nam Nguyen; Mingxi M Song; Christopher Hadiono; Sarah C Ogden; Christy Hammack; Bing Yao; Gregory R Hamersky; Fadi Jacob; Chun Zhong; Ki-Jun Yoon; William Jeang; Li Lin; Yujing Li; Jai Thakor; Daniel A Berg; Ce Zhang; Eunchai Kang; Michael Chickering; David Nauen; Cheng-Ying Ho; Zhexing Wen; Kimberly M Christian; Pei-Yong Shi; Brady J Maher; Hao Wu; Peng Jin; Hengli Tang; Hongjun Song; Guo-Li Ming Journal: Cell Date: 2016-04-22 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Santhosh V Kumar; Pei X Er; Kynan T Lawlor; Ali Motazedian; Michelle Scurr; Irene Ghobrial; Alexander N Combes; Luke Zappia; Alicia Oshlack; Edouard G Stanley; Melissa H Little Journal: Development Date: 2019-03-07 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: G E Xuemei; Y A N Hongli; Wang Nengzhuang; Shen Jiaming; L I U Minghua; M A Long; Q I N Lina Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2022-06-02 Impact factor: 3.357