Literature DB >> 32114318

Provider knowledge and perceptions following an integrated simulation training on emergency obstetric and neonatal care and respectful maternity care: A mixed-methods study in Ghana.

Patience A Afulani1, Jessica Dyer2, Kimberly Calkins2, Raymond A Aborigo3, Brienne Mcnally4, Susanna R Cohen5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about the effect of integrating respectful maternity care into clinical training programs. We sought to examine the effectiveness of an integrated simulation training on emergency obstetric and neonatal care and respectful maternity care on providers' knowledge and self-efficacy, and to asess providers' perceptions of the integrated training.
METHODS: The project was piloted in East Mamprusi district in Northern Ghana. Forty-three maternity providers were trained, with six participants trained as Simulation Facilitators. Data are from self-administered evaluation forms (with structured and open-ended questions) from all 43 providers and in-depth interviews with 17 providers. We conducted descriptive quantitative analysis and framework qualitative analysis.
RESULTS: Provider knowledge increased from an average of 61.6% at pre-test to 74.5% at post-test. Self-efficacy also increased from an average of 5.8/10 at pretest to 9.2/10 at post-test. Process evaluation data showed that providers valued the training. Over 95% of participants agreed that the training was useful to them and that they will use the tools learned in the training in their practice. Overall, providers had positive perceptions of the training. They noted improvements in their knowledge and confidence to manage obstetric and neonatal emergencies, as well as in patient-provider communication and teamwork. Many listed respectful maternity care elements as what was most impactful to them from the training.
CONCLUSIONS: Simulation and team-training on emergency obstetric and neonatal care, combined with respectful maternity care content, can enable health care providers to improve both their clinical and interpersonal knowledge and skills in a training setting that reflects their complex and stressful work environments. Our findings suggest this type of training is feasible, acceptable, and effective in limited-resource settings. Uptake of such trainings could drive efforts towards providing high quality safe, responsive, and respectful obstetric and neonatal care.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emergency obstetric and neonatal care; Ghana; Provider training; Quality of care; Respectful maternity care; Simulation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32114318     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  4 in total

1.  Qualitative needs assessment for paediatric emergency care in Kampala, Uganda.

Authors:  Boyoung Ahn; Ezekiel Mupere; Belén Irarrázaval; Robert O Opoka; Hellen Aanyu-Tukamuhebwa; Corey B Bills; Dorothy Gingo; Nicolaus W Glomb
Journal:  Afr J Emerg Med       Date:  2021-04-08

2.  Evaluation of SIMESON, a training program to improve access to quality health care for pregnant women and newborn in different healthcare facilities of northern Bangladesh.

Authors:  Rina Das; Fahmida Dil Farzana; Zakia Sultana; Kallol Mukherji; Adnan Baayo; Marufa Sultana; Nausad Ali; Mohammod Jobayer Chisti; Shafiqul Alam Sarker; Tahmeed Ahmed; Asg Faruque
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2021-11-16

3.  Self-reported provision of person-centred maternity care among providers in Kenya and Ghana: scale validation and examination of associated factors.

Authors:  Patience A Afulani; Raymond A Aborigo; Jerry John Nutor; Jaffer Okiring; Irene Kuwolamo; Beryl A Ogolla; Edwina N Oboke; John Baptist K Dorzie; Osamuedeme J Odiase; Jody Steinauer; Dilys Walker
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-11

Review 4.  Effectiveness of Communication Interventions in Obstetrics-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sonia Lippke; Christina Derksen; Franziska Maria Keller; Lukas Kötting; Martina Schmiedhofer; Annalena Welp
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.