Literature DB >> 32114149

Exploring brain-behavior relationships in the N-back task.

Bidhan Lamichhane1, Andrew Westbrook2, Michael W Cole3, Todd S Braver4.   

Abstract

Working memory (WM) function has traditionally been investigated in terms of two dimensions: within-individual effects of WM load, and between-individual differences in task performance. In human neuroimaging studies, the N-back task has frequently been used to study both. A reliable finding is that activation in frontoparietal regions exhibits an inverted-U pattern, such that activity tends to decrease at high load levels. Yet it is not known whether such U-shaped patterns are a key individual differences factor that can predict load-related changes in task performance. The current study investigated this question by manipulating load levels across a much wider range than explored previously (N ​= ​1-6), and providing a more comprehensive examination of brain-behavior relationships. In a sample of healthy young adults (n ​= ​57), the analysis focused on a distinct region of left lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) identified in prior work to show a unique relationship with task performance and WM function. In this region it was the linear slope of load-related activity, rather than the U-shaped pattern, that was positively associated with individual differences in target accuracy. Comprehensive supplemental analyses revealed the brain-wide selectivity of this pattern. Target accuracy was also independently predicted by the global resting-state connectivity of this LPFC region. These effects were robust, as demonstrated by cross-validation analyses and out-of-sample prediction, and also critically, were primarily driven by the high-load conditions. Together, the results highlight the utility of high-load conditions for investigating individual differences in WM function.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Default mode network; Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; Frontal-parietal network; N-back; Salience network; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32114149      PMCID: PMC7781187          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  48 in total

1.  Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach.

Authors:  Randall W Engle; Stephen W Tuholski; James E Laughlin; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1999-09

Review 2.  The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: an individual-differences perspective.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

3.  Intelligence and neural efficiency: further evidence of the influence of task content and sex on the brain-IQ relationship.

Authors:  Aljoscha C Neubauer; Roland H Grabner; Andreas Fink; Christa Neuper
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-09

4.  On how high performers keep cool brains in situations of cognitive overload.

Authors:  Susanne M Jaeggi; Martin Buschkuehl; Alex Etienne; Christoph Ozdoba; Walter J Perrig; Arto C Nirkko
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 5.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide.

Authors:  Andrew R A Conway; Michael J Kane; Michael F Bunting; D Zach Hambrick; Oliver Wilhelm; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

6.  NIH toolbox for assessment of neurological and behavioral function.

Authors:  Richard C Gershon; Molly V Wagster; Hugh C Hendrie; Nathan A Fox; Karon F Cook; Cindy J Nowinski
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 7.  Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences.

Authors:  Steven J Luck; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Global connectivity of prefrontal cortex predicts cognitive control and intelligence.

Authors:  Michael W Cole; Tal Yarkoni; Grega Repovs; Alan Anticevic; Todd S Braver
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Function in the human connectome: task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior.

Authors:  Deanna M Barch; Gregory C Burgess; Michael P Harms; Steven E Petersen; Bradley L Schlaggar; Maurizio Corbetta; Matthew F Glasser; Sandra Curtiss; Sachin Dixit; Cindy Feldt; Dan Nolan; Edward Bryant; Tucker Hartley; Owen Footer; James M Bjork; Russ Poldrack; Steve Smith; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Abraham Z Snyder; David C Van Essen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Age differences in prefontal recruitment during verbal working memory maintenance depend on memory load.

Authors:  Katherine A Cappell; Leon Gmeindl; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 4.027

View more
  10 in total

1.  Brain structural and functional substrates of ADGRL3 (latrophilin 3) haplotype in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Ana Moreno-Alcázar; Josep A Ramos-Quiroga; Marta Ribases; Cristina Sánchez-Mora; Gloria Palomar; Rosa Bosch; Josep Salavert; Lydia Fortea; Gemma C Monté-Rubio; Erick J Canales-Rodríguez; Michael P Milham; F Xavier Castellanos; Miquel Casas; Edith Pomarol-Clotet; Joaquim Radua
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Neural correlates of individual variation in two-back working memory and the relationship with fluid intelligence.

Authors:  Guangfei Li; Yu Chen; Thang M Le; Wuyi Wang; Xiaoying Tang; Chiang-Shan R Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Pupillometry tracks cognitive load and salience network activity in a working memory functional magnetic resonance imaging task.

Authors:  Julia Fietz; Dorothee Pöhlchen; Florian P Binder; Michael Czisch; Philipp G Sämann; Victor I Spoormaker
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Neurophysiological Verbal Working Memory Patterns in Children: Searching for a Benchmark of Modality Differences in Audio/Video Stimuli Processing.

Authors:  Bianca Maria Serena Inguscio; Giulia Cartocci; Nicolina Sciaraffa; Claudia Nasta; Andrea Giorgi; Maria Nicastri; Ilaria Giallini; Antonio Greco; Fabio Babiloni; Patrizia Mancini
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-20

5.  Mixed-effects multilevel analysis followed by canonical correlation analysis is an effective fMRI tool for the investigation of idiosyncrasies.

Authors:  Sungman Jo; Hyun-Chul Kim; Niv Lustig; Gang Chen; Jong-Hwan Lee
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  The role of neural load effects in predicting individual differences in working memory function.

Authors:  Y Peeta Li; Shelly R Cooper; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Executive Function-Related Improvements on a Commercial CBT-Based Weight Management Intervention: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Andreas Michaelides; Ellen Siobhan Mitchell; Heather Behr; Annabell Suh Ho; Grant Hanada; Jihye Lee; Sue McPartland
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  Load-dependent inverted U-shaped connectivity of the default mode network in schizophrenia during a working-memory task: evidence from a replication functional MRI study.

Authors:  Feiwen Wang; Chang Xi; Zhening Liu; Mengjie Deng; Wen Zhang; Hengyi Cao; Jie Yang; Lena Palaniyappan
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Effectiveness of theta and gamma electroacupuncture for post-stroke patients on working memory and electrophysiology: study protocol for a double-center, randomized, patient- and assessor-blinded, sham-controlled, parallel, clinical trial.

Authors:  Jing-Jing Xu; Meng Ren; Jing-Jun Zhao; Jia-Jia Wu; Si-Cong Zhang; Yan-Biao Zhong; Shu-Tian Xu; Zhong-Yao Cao; Zhi-Qing Zhou; Yuan-Li Li; Chun-Lei Shan
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 10.  Modeling brain, symptom, and behavior in the winds of change.

Authors:  David M Lydon-Staley; Eli J Cornblath; Ann Sizemore Blevins; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 8.294

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.