Literature DB >> 32113932

Bioprosthetic Valve Leaflet Displacement During Valve-in-Valve Intervention: An Ex Vivo Bench Study.

Mark Hensey1, Stephanie Sellers1, Janarthanan Sathananthan1, Althea Lai1, Uri Landes1, Abdullah Alkhodair1, Bruce McManus1, Anson Cheung1, David Wood1, Philipp Blanke1, Jonathon Leipsic1, Jian Ye1, John Webb2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of different transcatheter heart valves (THVs) on valve leaflet displacement when deployed within bioprosthetic surgical valves and, thereby, risk for coronary obstruction.
BACKGROUND: Coronary obstruction is a potentially devastating complication during valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Strategies such as provisional stenting and intentional bioprosthetic valve leaflet laceration have been developed to mitigate this risk. Alternatively, the use of a THV that retracts the bioprosthetic leaflet away from the coronary ostium may prevent coronary obstruction.
METHODS: A 25-mm J-Valve, a 26-mm Evolut Pro, and a 23-mm JenaValve were implanted into both a 25-mm Trifecta surgical valve and a 25-mm Mitroflow surgical valve. A 23-mm and a 26-mm SAPIEN 3 were deployed into the Trifecta and Mitroflow, respectively. Displacement of the surgical valve leaflets (retraction vs. expansion) was measured with implantation of each THV by measuring displacement angle and maximal displacement distance.
RESULTS: Within both the Trifecta and Mitroflow valves, implantation of the J-Valve and JenaValve resulted in retraction of the surgical valve leaflets, and placement of the Evolut Pro and SAPIEN 3 resulted in tubular expansion of the surgical valve leaflets. There were significant differences in displacement angles and distances between both the J-Valve and JenaValve and the SAPIEN 3 and Evolut Pro (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: ViV implantation with new-generation THVs that directly interact with bioprosthetic valve leaflets results in surgical valve leaflet retraction. This might mitigate the risk for coronary obstruction in selected cases of ViV transcatheter aortic valve replacement and also facilitate coronary reaccess after ViV TAVR.
Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TAVR; coronary obstruction; valve-in-valve

Year:  2020        PMID: 32113932     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.10.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  3 in total

Review 1.  Transcatether Aortic Valve Implantation to Treat Degenerated Surgical Bioprosthesis: Focus on the Specific Procedural Challenges.

Authors:  Cristina Aurigemma; Francesco Burzotta; Rocco Vergallo; Piero Farina; Enrico Romagnoli; Stefano Cangemi; Francesco Bianchini; Marialisa Nesta; Piergiorgio Bruno; Domenico D'Amario; Antonio Maria Leone; Carlo Trani
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-31

Review 2.  TAVR for All? The Surgical Perspective.

Authors:  Xiling Zhang; Thomas Puehler; Derk Frank; Janarthanan Sathananthan; Stephanie Sellers; David Meier; Marcus Both; Philipp Blanke; Hatim Seoudy; Mohammed Saad; Oliver J Müller; Lars Sondergaard; Georg Lutter
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-07-12

Review 3.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Severe Pure Aortic Regurgitation With Dedicated Devices.

Authors:  Pierluigi Costanzo; Paul Bamborough; Mark Peterson; Djeven J Deva; Geraldine Ong; Neil Fam
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2022-07-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.