Literature DB >> 32113797

CT-Guided Percutaneous Drainage Catheter Placement in the Abdomen and Pelvis: Predictors of Outcome and Protocol for Follow-up.

Clayton W Commander1, Sarah B Wilson2, Fatmir Bilaj3, Ari J Isaacson4, Charles T Burke4, Hyeon Yu4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine predictors of outcomes for patients who undergo computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous abdominal or pelvic drainage catheter placement and to identify which patients benefit from fluoroscopic drainage catheter interrogation (abscessogram).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 383 patients (mean, 52 years old; range 8-89 years old; 158 males: 225 females) who underwent 442 CT-guided procedures and 489 catheter placements for fluid collections in the abdomen or pelvis from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2016 was performed. Variables including underlying disease, fluid location, number of collections drained, number of catheter exchanges and follow-up abscessograms performed, catheter size, and fistula detection were analyzed to determine factors associated with fistula formation and increased catheter dwell time.
RESULTS: A single abscessogram followed by catheter removal was performed for 217 catheters (44%). An increased number of abscessograms was significantly associated with drainage catheter size (P < .001) and presence of a fistula (P < .001). Fistulae were detected in 95 cases (19%) and were significantly associated with an increased number of drain exchanges (P < .001) and an underlying diagnosis of Crohn's disease (P = .02). Based on these data, a clinical algorithm for drain management is presented.
CONCLUSIONS: Abscessograms performed after CT-guided percutaneous drainage catheter placement are useful to detect catheter malposition, occluded catheters, and fistulae but are not necessary for all patients. If performed selectively, particularly in patients with an underlying diagnosis of Crohn's disease or those at high risk for developing fistulae, unnecessary examinations can be avoided, reducing cost, extra hospital visits, and radiation dose.
Copyright © 2019 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32113797     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.09.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  3 in total

1.  Effectiveness of digestive endoscopy and surgery in the treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Peng Tang; Qinqing Zha; Lihua Zhou; Qiulian Yang; Mingfeng He; Shaomin Zhu; Yan Liu
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-09

2.  Imaging and Clinical Parameters for Distinction between Infected and Non-Infected Fluid Collections in CT: Prospective Study Using Extended Microbiological Approach.

Authors:  Christopher Skusa; Romy Skusa; Moritz Wohlfarth; Philipp Warnke; Andreas Podbielski; Kristina Bath; Justus Groß; Clemens Schafmayer; Hagen Frickmann; Marc-André Weber; Andreas Hahn; Felix G Meinel
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-14

Review 3.  Complications Risk Assessment and Imaging Findings of Thermal Ablation Treatment in Liver Cancers: What the Radiologist Should Expect.

Authors:  Vincenza Granata; Roberta Fusco; Federica De Muzio; Carmen Cutolo; Sergio Venanzio Setola; Igino Simonetti; Federica Dell'Aversana; Francesca Grassi; Federico Bruno; Andrea Belli; Renato Patrone; Vincenzo Pilone; Antonella Petrillo; Francesco Izzo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.964

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.