Literature DB >> 32113598

An extraordinary Karenia mikimotoi "beer tide" in Kachemak Bay Alaska.

Mark Vandersea1, Patricia Tester2, Kris Holderied3, Dominic Hondolero3, Steve Kibler4, Kim Powell3, Steve Baird5, Angela Doroff6, Darcy Dugan7, Andrew Meredith8, Michelle Tomlinson9, R Wayne Litaker4.   

Abstract

In autumn of 2013 an immense dinoflagellate bloom developed in Kachemak Bay, AK, USA. Much of the Bay was discolored a dark amber color and raised public concerns as small scale fish kills were reported in a few locations. Light microscopy revealed a monospecific bloom of gymnodinoid dinoflagellates that were previously unknown from the Bay. Gene sequencing of SSU rDNA from cells collected from the bloom confirmed the causative species to be Karenia mikimotoi. This represents the first report of a K. mikimotoi bloom in Alaska. After the bloom organism was confirmed, a K. mikimotoi species-specific qPCR assay was developed and used to assess K. mikimotoi abundances in DNA extracted from phytoplankton samples from Kachemak Bay and Lower Cook Inlet (LCI) obtained over a six-year period. The K. mikimotoi abundances were compared with corresponding time series of environmental variables (water temperature, salinity, water column stability, nutrients, precipitation and wind speed) to assess the factors contributing to the development of the bloom. The results showed early bloom development occurred in August when snow melt reduced salinities and increased water column stability during a period of calm winds. Peak bloom concentrations occurred in late September (107 cell eq. L-1) even as water temperatures were decreasing. The bloom gradually declined over the winter but persisted until April of 2014. Karenia mikimotoi cells were not detected two years prior or three years following the bloom, suggesting cells were introduced to Kachemak Bay at a time when conditions allowed K. mikimotoi to thrive. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bloom; Dinoflagellate; Growth rate; Lower Cook Inlet; Nutrients; Salinity; Stratification; Temperature; qPCR

Year:  2019        PMID: 32113598     DOI: 10.1016/j.hal.2019.101706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Harmful Algae        ISSN: 1568-9883            Impact factor:   4.273


  3 in total

Review 1.  Marine harmful algal blooms (HABs) in the United States: History, current status and future trends.

Authors:  Donald M Anderson; Elizabeth Fensin; Christopher J Gobler; Alicia E Hoeglund; Katherine A Hubbard; David M Kulis; Jan H Landsberg; Kathi A Lefebvre; Pieter Provoost; Mindy L Richlen; Juliette L Smith; Andrew R Solow; Vera L Trainer
Journal:  Harmful Algae       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.273

2.  Effects of substratum and depth on benthic harmful dinoflagellate assemblages.

Authors:  Li Keat Lee; Zhen Fei Lim; Haifeng Gu; Leo Lai Chan; R Wayne Litaker; Patricia A Tester; Chui Pin Leaw; Po Teen Lim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Proteome Analysis of Whole-Body Responses in Medaka Experimentally Exposed to Fish-Killing Dinoflagellate Karenia mikimotoi.

Authors:  Celia Sze-Nga Kwok; Kaze King-Yip Lai; Winnie Lam; Steven Jing-Liang Xu; Sai-Wo Lam; Fred Wang-Fat Lee
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.