| Literature DB >> 32113484 |
Jian Ou1, Chuanchun Yang2, Xiaoli Cui2, Chuan Chen2, Suyan Ye3, Cai Zhang2, Kai Wang2, Jianguo Chen2, Qin Zhang1, Chunfeng Qian1, Guangguang Fang4,5, Wenyong Zhang6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The study is aimed to provide prediction for fertility risk in the setting of assisted reproduction for a woman with complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCRs).Entities:
Keywords: Breakpoints mapping; Complex chromosomal rearrangements; Junction-spanning PCR; Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy; Whole-genome low-coverage mate-pair sequencing
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32113484 PMCID: PMC7049181 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-020-00572-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol ISSN: 1477-7827 Impact factor: 5.211
Fig. 1Maternal and fetal karyotype. (a) Mother karyotype. (b)19-week fetal amniotic fluid karyotype. Their karyotypes are 46, XX, der(1)t(1:4)(p22:q31.1),der(4)ins(5:4)(q22;q25q28)t(1:4), der(5)ins(5:4)
Fig. 2Experimental operation flow chart. First, we used WGL-MPS technology to detect the CCRs in maternal chromosomes. Secondly, we used PCR to verify the corresponding breakpoints of the 11 embryos generated by serial oocyte verification. Third, we performed PGT-A testing on the selected 3 embryos, and finally obtained an embryo with the same CCRs as the mother. Finally, we transplanted a screened qualified embryo and a normal phenotype baby with the same CCRs as its mother was born
Fig. 3Reassembly of all chromosomal regions that were involved in the translocations, according to HG19 (www.genome.ucsc.edu)
Primer information of the breakpoints
| Primer Name | Primer pair | Sequence (5′- > 3′) | Length | Tm | GC% | Product length [ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | Forward primer | GGCTGGGAAGTCCAACACGA | 20 | 62.39 | 60 | 382 |
| Reverse primer | CTAGTTCAGTCTGGATGTGGTCC | 23 | 60.12 | 52.17 | ||
| P2 | Forward primer | GGCAACCTAATCAAGTACGGAA | 22 | 58.4 | 45.45 | 471 |
| Reverse primer | CTCTCTTGCCTCACAAATGCAC | 22 | 60.1 | 50 | ||
| P3 | Forward primer | GGGAAGAGCCTTGCTCGTA | 19 | 59.1 | 57.89 | 336 |
| Reverse primer | TAAAGCAGGTATGCGTGAGATTG | 23 | 59.13 | 43.48 | ||
| P4 | Forward primer | GACAAAATGACAGCAATAAGCCC | 23 | 58.82 | 43.48 | 320 |
| Reverse primer | AGTTGGAAATCCTTCCTCAACTC | 23 | 58.34 | 43.48 | ||
| P5 | Forward primer | TGCAGGTTAAGTCCTCCGTTT | 21 | 59.58 | 47.62 | 421 |
| Reverse primer | GGGTTATGTTACCCTTCTGCCTAA | 24 | 60.08 | 45.83 | ||
| P6 | Forward primer | TGTAGTGGCACGATCTCAGC | 20 | 59.83 | 55 | 351 |
| Reverse primer | TCCTTGCCTCTTCCATTTGT | 20 | 57.02 | 45 | ||
| P7 | Forward primer | GCATGGCTCATCATATCGCATAA | 23 | 59.38 | 43.48 | 473 |
| Reverse primer | TGATGGTGCAACTAATGGCAGA | 22 | 60.29 | 45.45 | ||
| P8 | Forward primer | CTGGCTCAACTTTTGATGAGTGT | 23 | 59.43 | 43.48 | 391 |
| Reverse primer | TTCCAGAGAGTGGGGTCATCT | 21 | 59.92 | 52.38 |
Embryo screening results
| Code | Break(1–3) | Break(2–6) | Break(5–9) | Break(8–7) | Break(8–1) | Break(2–5) | Break(4–7) | Break(6–9) | PGT-A result | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Embryo1 | normal | OK | ||||||||
| Embryo2 | NA | Failed | ||||||||
| Embryo3 | NA | Failed | ||||||||
| Embryo4 | chr16 triploid | Failed | ||||||||
| Embryo5 | NA | Failed | ||||||||
| Embryo6 | NA | Failed | ||||||||
| Embryo7 | NA | Failed | ||||||||
| Embryo8 | NA | Failed | ||||||||
| Embryo9 | 6q16.1 del | Failed | ||||||||
| Embryo10 | NA | Failed | ||||||||
| Embryo11 | NA | Failed |