R J Wierichs1, J Musiol2, D Erdwey3, M Esteves-Oliveira4, C Apel5, H Meyer-Lueckel6. 1. Department of Restorative, Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland; Department of Biohybrid & Medical Textiles, Institute of Applied Medical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany. Electronic address: richard.wierichs@zmk.unibe.ch. 2. Department of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany. 3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany. 4. Department of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany; Department of Cariology, Endodontology and Periodontology, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany. 5. Department of Biohybrid & Medical Textiles, Institute of Applied Medical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany. 6. Department of Restorative, Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this double-blinded, randomized, cross-over in situ study was to evaluate the re- and demineralization characteristics of sound dentin as well as highly and lowly demineralized dentin after the application of different fluoride concentrations. METHODS: In each of four experimental legs of four weeks 20 participants wore intraoral mandibular appliances containing two (highly demineralized [EH]) bovine enamel and four (lowly and highly demineralized [DL,DH]) bovine dentin specimens (n = 480). Each specimen included one sound (ST) and one demineralized lesion area (DT). The four randomly allocated treatments included the following dentifrices: fluoride-free, zinc-carbonate-nano-hydroxyapatite [nHA0], 0 ppm F- [negative control,NaF0], 1100 ppm F- as NaF [standard therapy,NaF1100] and 5000 ppm F- as NaF [positive control,NaF5000]. Differences in integrated mineral loss (ΔΔZ) and lesion depth (ΔLD) were calculated between values before and after the in situ period using transversal microradiography. RESULTS: After the in situ period specimens of nHA0 and NaF0 showed signs of demineralization, indicated by significantly lower ΔZ&LD values for EH and DL (only nHA0)(p ≤ 0.028), whereas specimens of NaF1100 and NaF5000 showed signs of remineralization, indicated by significantly higher ΔZ values for EH (only NaF5000), DL and DH (p ≤ 0.012). The correlation between ΔΔZDT/ΔΔZST and F- was moderate for EH(rDT = 0.497;rST = 0.463) and DL(rDT = 0.575;rST = 0.598) and strong for DH(rDH = 0.700;rST = 0.611)(p < 0.001). No significant differences for ΔΔZDT/ΔΔZST were observed between nHA0 and NaF0(p ≥ 0.333;ANCOVA). CONCLUSION: The present in situ model was capable to reveal a fluoride dose-response on sound, lowly and highly demineralized dentin and also enamel specimens. Furthermore, both fluoride-free dentifrices, one containing nanohydroxyapatite, did not hamper demineralization. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The present in situ model was capable to reveal a fluoride dose-response on dentin similar to the anticipated clinical efficacy. Highly demineralized specimens seem to be recommendable for measuring anti-caries effects on dentin in situ. Furthermore both fluoride-free dentifrices, one containing nanohydroxyapatite, did not hamper demineralization. The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00011653).
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this double-blinded, randomized, cross-over in situ study was to evaluate the re- and demineralization characteristics of sound dentin as well as highly and lowly demineralized dentin after the application of different fluoride concentrations. METHODS: In each of four experimental legs of four weeks 20 participants wore intraoral mandibular appliances containing two (highly demineralized [EH]) bovine enamel and four (lowly and highly demineralized [DL,DH]) bovine dentin specimens (n = 480). Each specimen included one sound (ST) and one demineralized lesion area (DT). The four randomly allocated treatments included the following dentifrices: fluoride-free, zinc-carbonate-nano-hydroxyapatite [nHA0], 0 ppm F- [negative control,NaF0], 1100 ppm F- as NaF [standard therapy,NaF1100] and 5000 ppm F- as NaF [positive control,NaF5000]. Differences in integrated mineral loss (ΔΔZ) and lesion depth (ΔLD) were calculated between values before and after the in situ period using transversal microradiography. RESULTS: After the in situ period specimens of nHA0 and NaF0 showed signs of demineralization, indicated by significantly lower ΔZ&LD values for EH and DL (only nHA0)(p ≤ 0.028), whereas specimens of NaF1100 and NaF5000 showed signs of remineralization, indicated by significantly higher ΔZ values for EH (only NaF5000), DL and DH (p ≤ 0.012). The correlation between ΔΔZDT/ΔΔZST and F- was moderate for EH(rDT = 0.497;rST = 0.463) and DL(rDT = 0.575;rST = 0.598) and strong for DH(rDH = 0.700;rST = 0.611)(p < 0.001). No significant differences for ΔΔZDT/ΔΔZST were observed between nHA0 and NaF0(p ≥ 0.333;ANCOVA). CONCLUSION: The present in situ model was capable to reveal a fluoride dose-response on sound, lowly and highly demineralized dentin and also enamel specimens. Furthermore, both fluoride-free dentifrices, one containing nanohydroxyapatite, did not hamper demineralization. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The present in situ model was capable to reveal a fluoride dose-response on dentin similar to the anticipated clinical efficacy. Highly demineralized specimens seem to be recommendable for measuring anti-caries effects on dentin in situ. Furthermore both fluoride-free dentifrices, one containing nanohydroxyapatite, did not hamper demineralization. The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00011653).
Authors: Richard Johannes Wierichs; Judith Mester; Thomas Gerhard Wolf; Hendrik Meyer-Lueckel; Marcella Esteves-Oliveira Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2021-11-24 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Aiswarya Anil; Wael I Ibraheem; Abdullah A Meshni; Reghunathan S Preethanath; Sukumaran Anil Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-05 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Ellen Elisabeth Jansen; Hendrik Meyer-Lueckel; Marcella Esteves-Oliveira; Richard Johannes Wierichs Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2020-12-14 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Richard Johannes Wierichs; Thomas G Wolf; Guglielmo Campus; Thiago S Carvalho Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 3.573