Jan M Eberth1, Jennifer L Ersek2, Leah M Terry3, Sarah E Bills4, Nirupama Chintanippu2, Ruth Carlos5, Danny R Hughes6, Jamie L Studts7. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina; Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina; Director, Rural and Minority Health Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina. Electronic address: jmeberth@mailbox.sc.edu. 2. Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina. 3. Department of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky. 4. Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina. 5. Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 6. School of Economics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia; Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute, American College of Radiology, Reston, Virginia. 7. Professor, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine; Scientific Director, Behavioral Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine; Interim Program Leader, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of Colorado Cancer, Denver, Colorado.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Despite compelling support for the benefits of low-dose CT (LDCT) screening for lung cancer among high-risk individuals, awareness of LDCT screening and uptake remain low. The aim of this project was to explore the perspectives of ACR mammography screening program directors (MPDs) regarding efforts to raise LDCT screening awareness and appropriate referrals by identifying high-risk individuals participating in routine mammography. METHODS: MPDs were recruited from ACR-accredited mammography facilities to participate in semistructured interviews after the completion of an online survey. Interviews were conducted over the telephone, recorded, transcribed, and subsequently reviewed for accuracy. Twenty MPDs were interviewed, and 18 interviews were transcribed and included in the thematic analysis. A theme codebook was developed, and all interviews were coded using NVivo by two trained reviewers. RESULTS: Key themes were organized into four broad domains: (1) general attitudes toward the integration of LDCT screening, (2) identifying mammography patients at high risk for lung cancer, (3) counseling about LDCT screening, and (4) strategies to identify high-risk women and increase awareness and knowledge of LDCT screening. Overall, MPDs recognized the benefits of integrating mammography and LDCT screening and were receptive to educating and referring women for LDCT screening. However, training and workflow changes are needed to ensure successful implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Qualitative data suggest that MPDs are amenable to leveraging the mammography setting to engage women about LDCT screening; however, additional tools, training, and/or staffing may be necessary to leverage the full potential of reaching women at high risk for lung cancer within the context of mammographic screening.
PURPOSE: Despite compelling support for the benefits of low-dose CT (LDCT) screening for lung cancer among high-risk individuals, awareness of LDCT screening and uptake remain low. The aim of this project was to explore the perspectives of ACR mammography screening program directors (MPDs) regarding efforts to raise LDCT screening awareness and appropriate referrals by identifying high-risk individuals participating in routine mammography. METHODS: MPDs were recruited from ACR-accredited mammography facilities to participate in semistructured interviews after the completion of an online survey. Interviews were conducted over the telephone, recorded, transcribed, and subsequently reviewed for accuracy. Twenty MPDs were interviewed, and 18 interviews were transcribed and included in the thematic analysis. A theme codebook was developed, and all interviews were coded using NVivo by two trained reviewers. RESULTS: Key themes were organized into four broad domains: (1) general attitudes toward the integration of LDCT screening, (2) identifying mammography patients at high risk for lung cancer, (3) counseling about LDCT screening, and (4) strategies to identify high-risk women and increase awareness and knowledge of LDCT screening. Overall, MPDs recognized the benefits of integrating mammography and LDCT screening and were receptive to educating and referring women for LDCT screening. However, training and workflow changes are needed to ensure successful implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Qualitative data suggest that MPDs are amenable to leveraging the mammography setting to engage women about LDCT screening; however, additional tools, training, and/or staffing may be necessary to leverage the full potential of reaching women at high risk for lung cancer within the context of mammographic screening.
Authors: Elizabeth G Bouchard; Frances G Saad-Harfouche; Nikia Clark; Jomary Colon; Susan A LaValley; Mary Reid; Kristopher Attwood; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Kathryn Glaser Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2022-07-15 Impact factor: 1.771