Literature DB >> 32112460

Regrowth strategies of Leymus chinensis in response to different grazing intensities.

Zihe Zhang1,2, Jirui Gong1,2, Biao Wang1, Xiaobing Li1, Yong Ding3, Bo Yang1, Chenchen Zhu1, Min Liu1, Wei Zhang4.   

Abstract

In temperate grassland ecosystems, grazing can affect plant growth by foraging, trampling, and excretion. The ability of dominant plant species to regrow after grazing is critical, since it allows the regeneration of photosynthetic tissues to support growth. We conducted a field experiment to evaluate the effects of different grazing intensities (control, light, medium, and heavy) on the physiological and biochemical responses of Leymus chinensis and the carbon (C) sources utilized during regrowth. Light grazing promoted regrowth and photoassimilate storage of L. chinensis, by increasing the net photosynthetic rate (Pn ), photosynthetic quenching, light interception, sugar accumulation, sucrose synthase activities, and fructose supply from stems. At medium grazing intensity, L. chinensis had low Pn , light interception, and sugar accumulation, but higher expression of a sucrose transporter gene (LcSUT1) and water-use efficiency, which reflected a tendency to store C in belowground to promote survival. This strategy was associated with regulation by abscisic acid (ABA), jasmonate, and salicylic acid (SA) signaling. However, L. chinensis tolerated heavy grazing by increased ABA and jasmonate-induced promotion of C assimilation and osmotic adjustment, combined with photoprotection against photo-oxidation, suggesting a strategy based on regrowth. In addition, stems were the main C source organs and energy supply rather than roots. Simultaneously, SA represented a weaker defense than ABA and jasmonate. Therefore, L. chinensis adopted different strategies for regrowth under different grazing intensities, and light grazing promoted regrowth the most. Our results demonstrate the regulation of C reserves utilization by phytohormones, and this regulation provides an explanation for recent results about grazing responses.
© 2020 by the Ecological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carbon reserve utilization; gene expression; grazing; photosynthesis; phytohormones; regrowth; sucrose transport and metabolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32112460     DOI: 10.1002/eap.2113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  4 in total

1.  Growth-Defense Trade-Offs Induced by Long-term Overgrazing Could Act as a Stress Memory.

Authors:  Kairi Qu; Yunxiang Cheng; Kairu Gao; Weibo Ren; Ellen L Fry; Jingjing Yin; Yaling Liu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Transcriptome-Wide Gene Expression Plasticity in Stipa grandis in Response to Grazing Intensity Differences.

Authors:  Zhenhua Dang; Yuanyuan Jia; Yunyun Tian; Jiabin Li; Yanan Zhang; Lei Huang; Cunzhu Liang; Peter J Lockhart; Cory Matthew; Frank Yonghong Li
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Grazing during the grassland greenup period promotes plant species richness in alpine grassland in winter pastures.

Authors:  Wanrong Wei; Qiaoyan Zhen; Jia Deng; Hanlin Yue; Mingsen Qin; Maria K Oosthuizen
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Transcriptional Memory in Taraxacum mongolicum in Response to Long-Term Different Grazing Intensities.

Authors:  Yalin Wang; Wenyan Zhu; Fei Ren; Na Zhao; Shixiao Xu; Ping Sun
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.