Literature DB >> 32112415

Multiple observation processes in spatial capture-recapture models: How much do we gain?

Mahdieh Tourani1, Pierre Dupont1, Muhammad Ali Nawaz2,3, Richard Bischof1.   

Abstract

Population monitoring data may originate from multiple methods and are often sparse and fraught with incomplete information due to practical and economic constraints. Models that can integrate multiple survey methods and are able to cope with incomplete data may help investigators exploit available information more thoroughly. Here, we developed an integrated spatial capture-recapture (SCR) model to incorporate multiple data sources with imperfect individual identification. We contrast inferences drawn from this model with alternate models incorporating only subsets of the data available. Using extensive simulations and an empirical example of multi-method brown bear (Ursus arctos) monitoring data from northern Pakistan, we quantified the benefits of including multiple sources of information in SCR models in terms of parameter precision and bias. Our multiple observation processes SCR model (MOP) yielded a more complete picture of the underlying processes, reduced bias, and led to more precise parameter estimates. Our results suggest that the greatest gains from integrated SCR models can be expected in situations where detection probability is low, a large proportion of detections is not attributable to individuals, and the degree of overlap between individual home ranges is low.
© 2020 The Authors. Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Ecological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  camera trap; data integration; large carnivore; multiple observation process; noninvasive monitoring; simulation; spatial capture-recapture

Year:  2020        PMID: 32112415     DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  5 in total

1.  Evaluating and integrating spatial capture-recapture models with data of variable individual identifiability.

Authors:  Joel S Ruprecht; Charlotte E Eriksson; Tavis D Forrester; Darren A Clark; Michael J Wisdom; Mary M Rowland; Bruce K Johnson; Taal Levi
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 6.105

Review 2.  A review of spatial capture-recapture: Ecological insights, limitations, and prospects.

Authors:  Mahdieh Tourani
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Estimating red fox density using non-invasive genetic sampling and spatial capture-recapture modelling.

Authors:  Lars K Lindsø; Pierre Dupont; Lars Rød-Eriksen; Ida Pernille Øystese Andersskog; Kristine Roaldsnes Ulvund; Øystein Flagstad; Richard Bischof; Nina E Eide
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  An empirical demonstration of the effect of study design on density estimations.

Authors:  Muhammad Ali Nawaz; Barkat Ullah Khan; Amer Mahmood; Muhammad Younas; Jaffar Ud Din; Chris Sutherland
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Estimating and forecasting spatial population dynamics of apex predators using transnational genetic monitoring.

Authors:  Richard Bischof; Cyril Milleret; Pierre Dupont; Joseph Chipperfield; Mahdieh Tourani; Andrés Ordiz; Perry de Valpine; Daniel Turek; J Andrew Royle; Olivier Gimenez; Øystein Flagstad; Mikael Åkesson; Linn Svensson; Henrik Brøseth; Jonas Kindberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.