Literature DB >> 32112199

What factors determine specimen quality in colon cancer surgery? A cohort study.

Kheng-Seong Ng1,2, Nicholas P West3, Nigel Scott4, Melanie Holzgang5, Phil Quirke3, David G Jayne5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Tenets of 'good quality' colon cancer surgery include mesocolic plane dissection to preserve an intact mesocolic fascia/peritoneum, and excision of sufficient mesocolon for adequate lymphadenectomy. However, it remains controversial what clinicopathological factors determine 'good quality' surgery, and whether quality of surgery influences morbidity/mortality. This study documents the quality of colon cancer surgery at a quaternary referral centre and identifies factors that influence quality of surgery and post-operative outcomes.
METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent resection for colon adenocarcinoma at St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK (2015-2017), were included. Primary outcome measures included (i) plane of mesocolic dissection, prospectively assessed; and (ii) tissue morphometry (area of mesentery and vascular pedicle length). Other histopathological data were extracted from a prospective database. Clinical data were obtained from the National Bowel Cancer Audit and individual records.
RESULTS: Four hundred five patients were included (mean 69.6 years). The majority (67.4%) of specimens were mesocolic plane dissections. Median area of mesentery excised was 12,085.4 mm2. Median vascular pedicle length was 89.3 mm. Post-operative complication was recorded in one-third of patients. Mesocolic plane excision was associated with open surgery (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.05-3.09), especially in emergency colectomy. Open resections also had a greater mesentery excised (P = 0.002), but incurred more post-operative complication (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.12-3.99). Post-operative complication was not associated with plane of excision or tissue morphometry.
CONCLUSION: Majority of resections were 'optimal' mesocolic plane dissections. Open resections yielded better quality specimens, but incurred more morbidity. There is room for improvement in the quality of laparoscopic colon cancer surgery, particularly those performed as emergency.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon cancer; Emergency surgery; Minimally invasive surgery; Quality of surgery; Surgical outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32112199     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03541-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  22 in total

Review 1.  Complete mesocolic resection and extended lymphadenectomy for colon cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Killeen; M Mannion; A Devaney; D C Winter
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.788

2.  VII. Lymphatics of the Colon: With Special Reference to the Operative Treatment of Cancer of the Colon.

Authors:  J K Jamieson; J F Dobson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1909-12       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Quality of surgery for stage III colon cancer: comparison between England, Germany, and Japan.

Authors:  Hirotoshi Kobayashi; Nicholas P West; Keiichi Takahashi; Aristoteles Perrakis; Klaus Weber; Werner Hohenberger; Philip Quirke; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations: 2018.

Authors:  U O Gustafsson; M J Scott; M Hubner; J Nygren; N Demartines; N Francis; T A Rockall; T M Young-Fadok; A G Hill; M Soop; H D de Boer; R D Urman; G J Chang; A Fichera; H Kessler; F Grass; E E Whang; W J Fawcett; F Carli; D N Lobo; K E Rollins; A Balfour; G Baldini; B Riedel; O Ljungqvist
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Short term results of complete (D3) vs. standard (D2) mesenteric excision in colon cancer shows improved outcome of complete mesenteric excision in patients with TNM stages I-II.

Authors:  K E Storli; K Søndenaa; B Furnes; I Nesvik; E Gudlaugsson; I Bukholm; G E Eide
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation--technical notes and outcome.

Authors:  W Hohenberger; K Weber; K Matzel; T Papadopoulos; S Merkel
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.788

8.  5-year outcome after complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Claus A Bertelsen; Anders U Neuenschwander; Jens E Jansen; Jutaka R Tenma; Michael Wilhelmsen; Anders Kirkegaard-Klitbo; Else R Iversen; Birgitte Bols; Peter Ingeholm; Leif A Rasmussen; Lars V Jepsen; Pernille W Born; Bent Kristensen; Jakob Kleif
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Feasibility of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery in the acute setting: the LaCeS feasibility trial protocol.

Authors:  Deena Harji; Helen Marshall; Katie Gordon; Hannah Crow; Victoria Hiley; Dermot Burke; Ben Griffiths; Catherine Moriarty; Maureen Twiddy; John L O'Dwyer; Azmina Verjee; Julia Brown; Peter Sagar
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.