Literature DB >> 32111350

Early experience with the HeartMate 3 continuous-flow ventricular assist device in pediatric patients and patients with congenital heart disease: A multicenter registry analysis.

Matthew J O'Connor1, Angela Lorts2, Ryan R Davies3, Francis Fynn-Thompson4, Anna Joong5, Katsuhide Maeda6, Christopher E Mascio7, Patrick I McConnell8, Michael C Mongé9, Deipanjan Nandi10, David M Peng11, David N Rosenthal12, Ming-Sing Si13, David L Sutcliffe14, Christina J VanderPluym15, Melita Viegas16, Farhan Zafar2, Matthew Zinn17, David L S Morales2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The HeartMate 3 ventricular assist device (VAD) is a newer centrifugal continuous-flow VAD used for bridge-to-transplant and destination therapy in adults. However, there is limited experience regarding its use in children and adults with complex congenital heart disease (CHD).
METHODS: The Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network (ACTION) is a multicenter learning network comprised of pediatric hospitals implanting VADs in children and adults with complex CHD. We examined the outcomes of patients undergoing HeartMate 3 implantation at an ACTION center between December 2017 and September 2019.
RESULTS: The HeartMate 3 was implanted in 35 patients at 9 ACTION centers, with a median age of 15.7 (8.8-47.3) years, median weight of 65.7 (19.1-114.1) kg, and median body surface area (BSA) of 1.74 (0.78-2.36) m2. Of the cohort, 14 patients (40%) weighed <60 kg. Diagnoses included dilated cardiomyopathy (63%), dilated cardiomyopathy in neuromuscular disease (20%), and CHD (17%). Of those with CHD, most had a Fontan circulation. With a median 78 days of follow-up, there was 1 death on device (97% survival); 20 out of 35 (57%) underwent transplantation with no post-transplantation mortality. There were no episodes of stroke or pump thrombosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of the HeartMate 3 in ACTION centers was associated with a low incidence of mortality and adverse events. Patients as small as 19 kg (BSA 0.78 m2) were successfully implanted and supported, indicating that this device may be appropriate for older children and small adults.
Copyright © 2020 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  children; congenital; mechanical circulatory support; pediatric; ventricular assist device

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32111350     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  12 in total

Review 1.  Transplant and mechanical circulatory support in patients with adult congenital heart disease.

Authors:  James Monaco; Amber Khanna; Prateeti Khazanie
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 2.  Pediatric ventricular assist device registries: update and perspectives in the era of miniaturized continuous-flow pumps.

Authors:  Kevin M Lichtenstein; Hari P Tunuguntla; David M Peng; Holger Buchholz; Jennifer Conway
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-05

Review 3.  Current and Future Drug and Device Therapies for Pediatric Heart Failure Patients: Potential Lessons from Adult Trials.

Authors:  Bibhuti B Das; William B Moskowitz; Javed Butler
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-22

4.  The ever-changing field of mechanical circulatory support: new challenges at the advent of the 'single device era'.

Authors:  Laurens F Tops; Andrew J S Coats; Tuvia Ben Gal
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 17.349

Review 5.  Patient and Device Selection in Pediatric MCS: A Review of Current Consensus and Unsettled Questions.

Authors:  Joshua M Friedland-Little; Anna Joong; Svetlana B Shugh; Matthew J O'Connor; Neha Bansal; Ryan R Davies; Michelle S Ploutz
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 1.838

Review 6.  Hemostatic Challenges in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine-Hemostatic Balance in VAD.

Authors:  Muhammad Bakr Ghbeis; Christina J Vander Pluym; Ravi Ram Thiagarajan
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.418

7.  Impact of Coronavirus-2019 On Pediatric and Adult Heart Transplantation Waitlist Activity and Mortality in The United States: A Descriptive Approach.

Authors:  Awais Ashfaq; Geoffrey M Gray; Jennifer Carapellucci; Ernest K Amankwah; Luis M Ahumada; Mohamed Rehman; Michael Puchalski; Andrew Smith; James A Quintessenza; Alfred Asante-Korang
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Am       Date:  2021-08-31

8.  Virtual Simulated Implantation of an Adult-Sized Left Ventricular Assist Device in a Pediatric Patient.

Authors:  Dilachew A Adebo; Santosh C Uppu; Avichal Aggarwal; Jorge D Salazar; Damien J LaPar
Journal:  JACC Case Rep       Date:  2022-02-16

9.  Impact of the HeartMate 3 continuous-flow left ventricular assist device in patients with small body size.

Authors:  Kohei Tonai; Satsuki Fukushima; Naoki Tadokoro; Satoshi Kainuma; Naonori Kawamoto; Takashi Kakuta; Ayumi Koga-Ikuta; Takuya Watanabe; Osamu Seguchi; Yasumasa Tsukamoto; Norihide Fukushima; Tomoyuki Fujita
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-05-02

10.  Using virtual reality simulated implantation for fit-testing pediatric patients for adult ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Ryan R Davies; Tarique Hussain; Animesh Tandon
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2020-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.