Abdullah D Alanazi1, Viet Linh Nguyen2, Mohamed S Alyousif3, Ranju R S Manoj2, Abdulaziz S Alouffi4, Ridolfi Donato5, Alireza Sazmand6, Jairo A Mendoza-Roldan2, Filipe Dantas-Torres2,7, Domenico Otranto8,9. 1. Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science and Humanities, Shaqra University, Ad-Dawadimi, Saudi Arabia. aalanazi@su.edu.sa. 2. Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Bari, Bari, Italy. 3. Department of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 4. Life Science and Environment Sector, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 5. Istituto Zooprofilattico della Puglia e della Basilicata, Bari, Italy. 6. Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran. 7. Department of Immunology, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Aggeu Magalhães Institute, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. 8. Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Bari, Bari, Italy. domenico.otranto@uniba.it. 9. Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran. domenico.otranto@uniba.it.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Camel production in Saudi Arabia is severely affected by various diseases and by inadequate veterinary services. Ticks and tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) affect the health and wellbeing of camels consequently diminishing their productivity and performances. In addition, camels may act as hosts for TBPs (e.g. Anaplasma phagocytophilum) causing diseases in humans. The current study aimed to determine the prevalence of ixodid ticks and molecularly investigate the associated pathogens in camels from Saudi Arabia. METHODS: Blood and tick samples were collected from camels (n = 170) in Riyad Province of Saudi Arabia. Ticks were morphologically identified, and blood of camels were molecularly screened for apicomplexan (i.e. Babesia spp., Theileria spp., Hepatozoon spp.) and rickettsial parasites (i.e. Ehrlichia spp. and Anaplasma spp.). RESULTS: Of the 170 camels examined, 116 (68.2%; 95% CI: 60.9-75.1%) were infested by ticks with a mean intensity of 2.53 (95% CI: 2.4-2.6). In total of 296 ticks collected, Hyalomma dromedarii was the most prevalent (76.4%), followed by Hyalomma impeltatum (23.3%) and Hyalomma excavatum (0.3%). Of the tested animals, 13 (7.6%; 95% CI: 4.3-12.8%) scored positive to at least one TBP, with Anaplasma platys (5.3%; 95% CI: 2.7-9.9%) being the most prevalent species, followed by Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Anaplasma sp., Ehrlichia canis and Hepatozoon canis (0.6% each; 95% CI: 0.04-3.4%). None of the camels were found to be co-infected with more than one pathogen. All samples tested negative for Babesia spp. and Theileria spp. CONCLUSIONS: The present study reveals the occurrence of different tick species and TBPs in camels from Saudi Arabia. Importantly, these camels may carry A. phagocytophilum and A. platys, representing a potential risk to humans.
BACKGROUND:Camel production in Saudi Arabia is severely affected by various diseases and by inadequate veterinary services. Ticks and tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) affect the health and wellbeing of camels consequently diminishing their productivity and performances. In addition, camels may act as hosts for TBPs (e.g. Anaplasma phagocytophilum) causing diseases in humans. The current study aimed to determine the prevalence of ixodid ticks and molecularly investigate the associated pathogens in camels from Saudi Arabia. METHODS: Blood and tick samples were collected from camels (n = 170) in Riyad Province of Saudi Arabia. Ticks were morphologically identified, and blood of camels were molecularly screened for apicomplexan (i.e. Babesia spp., Theileria spp., Hepatozoon spp.) and rickettsial parasites (i.e. Ehrlichia spp. and Anaplasma spp.). RESULTS: Of the 170 camels examined, 116 (68.2%; 95% CI: 60.9-75.1%) were infested by ticks with a mean intensity of 2.53 (95% CI: 2.4-2.6). In total of 296 ticks collected, Hyalomma dromedarii was the most prevalent (76.4%), followed by Hyalomma impeltatum (23.3%) and Hyalomma excavatum (0.3%). Of the tested animals, 13 (7.6%; 95% CI: 4.3-12.8%) scored positive to at least one TBP, with Anaplasma platys (5.3%; 95% CI: 2.7-9.9%) being the most prevalent species, followed by Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Anaplasma sp., Ehrlichia canis and Hepatozoon canis (0.6% each; 95% CI: 0.04-3.4%). None of the camels were found to be co-infected with more than one pathogen. All samples tested negative for Babesia spp. and Theileria spp. CONCLUSIONS: The present study reveals the occurrence of different tick species and TBPs in camels from Saudi Arabia. Importantly, these camels may carry A. phagocytophilum and A. platys, representing a potential risk to humans.
Authors: Abdullah D Alanazi; Abdulaziz S Alouffi; Mohamed S Alyousif; Mohammad Y Alshahrani; Hend H A M Abdullah; Sobhy Abdel-Shafy; Nichola Eliza Davies Calvani; Maryam Ansari-Lari; Alireza Sazmand; Domenico Otranto Journal: Pathogens Date: 2020-12-31
Authors: Samia Q Alghamdi; Van Lun Low; Hadil A Alkathiry; Abdulaziz N Alagaili; John W McGarry; Benjamin L Makepeace Journal: Parasit Vectors Date: 2021-10-19 Impact factor: 3.876
Authors: El Tigani Ahmed El Tigani-Asil; Valeria Blanda; Ghada Elderdiri Abdelwahab; Zulaikha Mohamed Al Hammadi; Shameem Habeeba; Abdelmalik Ibrahim Khalafalla; Mohamed Ali Alhosani; Francesco La Russa; Sergio Migliore; Alessandra Torina; Guido Ruggero Loria; Salama Suhail Al Muhairi Journal: Animals (Basel) Date: 2021-03-02 Impact factor: 2.752
Authors: Wessam Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed; Alsagher O Ali; Hassan Y A H Mahmoud; Mosaab A Omar; Elisha Chatanga; Bashir Salim; Doaa Naguib; Jason L Anders; Nariaki Nonaka; Mohamed Abdallah Mohamed Moustafa; Ryo Nakao Journal: Pathogens Date: 2021-03-16
Authors: Dennis Getange; Joel L Bargul; Esther Kanduma; Marisol Collins; Boku Bodha; Diba Denge; Tatenda Chiuya; Naftaly Githaka; Mario Younan; Eric M Fèvre; Lesley Bell-Sakyi; Jandouwe Villinger Journal: Microorganisms Date: 2021-06-30
Authors: Farhan Ahmad Atif; Saba Mehnaz; Muhammad Fiaz Qamar; Taleeha Roheen; Muhammad Sohail Sajid; Syed Ehtisham-Ul-Haque; Muhammad Kashif; Mourad Ben Said Journal: Vet Sci Date: 2021-12-08