| Literature DB >> 32111194 |
Lifan Huang1, Yan Chu2, Xiaoqin Huang1, Shaohui Ma1, Keqin Lin1, Kai Huang1, Hao Sun3, Zhaoqing Yang4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Abnormal calcium homeostasis related to the development of hypertension. As the key regulator of intracellular calcium concentration, voltage-dependent calcium channels (VDCCs), the variations in these genes may have important effects on the development of hypertension. Here we evaluate VDCCs variability with respect to hypertension in the Dai ethnic group of China.Entities:
Keywords: Dai people; Hypertension; Polymorphism; Voltage-dependent calcium channels
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32111194 PMCID: PMC7049211 DOI: 10.1186/s12881-020-0982-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Genet ISSN: 1471-2350 Impact factor: 2.103
Fig. 1Locations of the 17 SNPs at the VDCC coding-gene locus and their haplotype configurations. The values shown in these haploblock figures are all r2 in Dai people
Survey indicators and statistical analysis of the study participants
| Hypertensive | Normal | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of people | 495 | 539 | |
| Sex (male/female) | 199/296 | 186/353 | 0.059 |
| Age (years) | 60.01 ± 10.68 | 53.37 ± 10.36 | < 0.001* |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.88 ± 3.12 | 22.76 ± 3.12 | < 0.001* |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 164.86 ± 20.22 | 117.94 ± 10.38 | < 0.001* |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 94.48 ± 12.50 | 72.79 ± 7.382 | < 0.001* |
| Total triglycerides (mmol/L) | 2.24 ± 1.67 | 1.82 ± 1.81 | < 0.001* |
| Low density lipoprotein (mmol/L) | 2.83 ± 0.83 | 2.56 ± 0.75 | < 0.001* |
| High density lipoprotein (mmol/L) | 1.43 ± 0.47 | 1.42 ± 0.31 | 0.960 |
Quantitative data are reported as the mean ± standard deviation and were tested with the independent-sample T test. Qualitative data were analysed by the chi-square test
BMI body mass index
*P < 0.05
Comparison of the 17 SNP frequencies between hypertensive and normal populations
| Nearby gene | SNP | Chromosome: position | Minor/Major | Hypertensive | Normal | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CACNA1S | rs3767505 | 1:201065408 | C/T | 272/658 | 326/712 | 0.298 |
| rs2365293 | 1:201106117 | T/C | 335/561 | 332/678 | 0.039* | |
| CACNB2 | rs10764327 | 10:18159919 | G/T | 350/526 | 427/601 | 0.484 |
| rs1757209 | 10:18183913 | G/A | 149/775 | 203/841 | 0.055 | |
| rs7072759 | 10:18282286 | G/A | 404/494 | 446/570 | 0.632 | |
| rs17539088 | 10:18370214 | G/A | 270/676 | 343/691 | 0.026* | |
| rs16917217 | 10:18370276 | G/A | 274/678 | 343/689 | 0.032* | |
| rs61839222 | 10:18370285 | A/C | 274/678 | 343/689 | 0.032* | |
| CACNA1C | rs2283274 | 12:2075300 | C/G | 323/591 | 366/652 | 0.779 |
| rs7304870 | 12:2164089 | A/G | 448/422 | 498/528 | 0.200 | |
| rs10848627 | 12:2203242 | G/A | 296/654 | 343/703 | 0.435 | |
| rs10848628 | 12:2203323 | C/T | 291/657 | 341/701 | 0.331 | |
| rs2239031 | 12:2227003 | T/G | 262/680 | 304/734 | 0.469 | |
| CACNA1A | rs2074880 | 19:13261817 | C/A | 353/557 | 436/580 | 0.066 |
| rs10425859 | 19:13408848 | A/G | 469/461 | 474/562 | 0.038* | |
| rs76143985 | 19:13415178 | A/G | 268/650 | 265/777 | 0.062 | |
| rs1422259 | 19:13428788 | C/T | 293/627 | 337/679 | 0.535 |
The chi-square test was performed for the 17 loci in the Dai group. SNP single nucleotide polymorphism. *P < 0.05, but after Bonferroni’s correction (P < 0.003 (0.05/17)), the positive results disappeared
Relation of SNPs to hypertension as determined by multivariable logistic regression analysis
| Nearby gene | SNP | Minor/ | Dominant | Recessive | Additive | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | OR | OR | ||||||
| CACNA1S | rs2365293 | T/C | 0.048* | 1.335 (1.002–1.778) | 1.102 | – | 0.093 | – |
| CACNB2 | rs17539088 | G/A | 0.027* | 0.732 (0.554–0.966) | 0.702 | – | 0.021* | 0.769 (0.616–0.960) |
| rs16917217 | G/A | 0.031* | 0.737 (0.558–0.973) | 0.719 | – | 0.025* | 0.776 (0.622–0.969) | |
| rs61839222 | A/C | 0.031* | 0.737 (0.558–0.973) | 0.719 | – | 0.025* | 0.776 (0.622–0.969) | |
| CACNA1A | rs10425859 | A/G | 0.177 | – | 1.494 | – | 0.025* | 1.269 (1.030–1.563) |
Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed with adjustment for sex, age, BMI, TG, LDL and HDL
OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval
*P < 0.05