| Literature DB >> 32110994 |
Bahareh Vafakish1, Lee D Wilson1.
Abstract
The detection and removal of heavy metal species in aquatic environments is of continued interest to address ongoing efforts inEntities:
Keywords: Cu(II) adsorption; adsorption mechanism; chitosan; fluorescence; grafting; in situ sensor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32110994 PMCID: PMC7179099 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25051052
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1(a) FT-IR spectra of pristine chitosan (CS), CS-Ac-An, and CS-Ac-An-Cu(II) (after adsorption). (b) 1H-NMR spectra of pristine chitosan (CS) and CS-Ac-An (before adsorption).
Figure 2SEM images: (a) Secondary electron image of CS-Ac-An (before adsorption). (b) Backscattered electron image of CS-Ac-An-Cu(II) with needle-shaped copper sulfate on the surface of the adsorbent (concentration of Cu(II) solution: 100 mg L−1). Insets: images that illustrate the off-white color of adsorbent ((a) before adsorption) and the deep blue color of adsorbent ((b) after Cu(II) adsorption).
Figure 3XPS spectra of (a) CS-Ac-An before and after metal adsorption; (b) Cu 2p high resolution spectra; (c) C 1s high resolution spectra before and after adsorption; (d) N 1s high resolution spectra before and after adsorption; and (e) O 1s high resolution spectra before and after adsorption.
Figure 41H-NMR spectra before and after adsorption. Downfield shifts and spectral broadening of the aromatic region upon formation of a N–Cu(II) complex is indicated.
Figure 5CS-Ac-An structure with interactions (dotted lines) between Cu(II) (blue circles) ions and active sites of the adsorbent, where the solvent is omitted for clarity purposes.
Figure 6Adsorption isotherms for chitosan (▲) fitted to the Sips model and CS-Ac-An (■) fitted to the Langmuir and Sips models at ambient pH (6.5–7) and 23 °C. Cu(II) concentration: 50–800 mg L−1, contact time: 24 h, adsorbent dosage: 5 mg. The adsorption profile for chitosan is shown for comparison.
Sips model adsorption parameters for Cu(II) uptake with CS and CS-Ac-An at 23 °C.
| CS | CS-Ac-An | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qm | Ks (L g−1) | ns | Adj-R2 | Qm (mg g−1) | Ks (L g−1) | ns | Adj-R2 |
| 4.56 | 11.2 | 2.88 | 0.851 | 106.6 | 9.52 | 1.85 | 0.978 |
Figure 7(a) Kinetic adsorption profile of Cu(II) uptake with CS-Ac-An at ambient pH (6.5–7) and 23 °C that were fit by the PFO and PSO models. Cu(II) concentration: 20 mg L−1, volume: 100 mL, and adsorbent dosage: 100 mg. (b) Kinetic data analyzed by the Weber and Morris model for variable Cu(II) concentration at ambient pH (6.5–7) and 23 °C. Cu(II) concentration: 20, 50, and 100 mg L−1; volume: 100 mL; and adsorbent dosage: 100 mg.
Figure 8(a) Fluorescence spectra of CS-Ac-An in the presence of variable Cu(II) levels in aqueous acetic acid (2 wt%), λex = 330 nm. (b) Plot of F0/F against Cu(II) concentration (Stern-Volmer equation).