| Literature DB >> 32110893 |
Martina Preiner1, Silke Asche2, Sidney Becker3, Holly C Betts4, Adrien Boniface5, Eloi Camprubi6, Kuhan Chandru7,8, Valentina Erastova9, Sriram G Garg1, Nozair Khawaja10, Gladys Kostyrka11, Rainer Machné12,13, Giacomo Moggioli14, Kamila B Muchowska15, Sinje Neukirchen16, Benedikt Peter17, Edith Pichlhöfer16, Ádám Radványi18,19, Daniele Rossetto20, Annalena Salditt21, Nicolas M Schmelling12,22, Filipa L Sousa16, Fernando D K Tria1, Dániel Vörös18,19, Joana C Xavier1.
Abstract
Research on the origin of life is highly heterogeneous. After a peculiar historical development, it still includes strongly opposed views which potentially hinder progress. In the 1st Interdisciplinary Origin of Life Meeting, early-career researchers gathered to explore the commonalities between theories and approaches, critical divergence points, and expectations for the future. We find that even though classical approaches and theories-e.g. bottom-up and top-down, RNA world vs. metabolism-first-have been prevalent in origin of life research, they are ceasing to be mutually exclusive and they can and should feed integrating approaches. Here we focus on pressing questions and recent developments that bridge the classical disciplines and approaches, and highlight expectations for future endeavours in origin of life research.Entities:
Keywords: LUCA; abiogenesis; bottom-up; early life; emergence; origins of life; prebiotic chemistry; top-down
Year: 2020 PMID: 32110893 DOI: 10.3390/life10030020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Life (Basel) ISSN: 2075-1729