| Literature DB >> 32110338 |
Hannah M Nicholas1, Michele Vonci1, Conrad A P Goodwin1, Song Wei Loo1, Siobhan R Murphy1, Daniel Cassim1, Richard E P Winpenny1, Eric J L McInnes1, Nicholas F Chilton1, David P Mills1.
Abstract
Low coordinate metal complexes can exhibit superlative phyEntities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 32110338 PMCID: PMC7020784 DOI: 10.1039/c9sc03431e
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Sci ISSN: 2041-6520 Impact factor: 9.825
Scheme 1Synthesis of 2-Ln and 3-Ln. See ref. 36 for the synthesis of 3-Sm.
Fig. 1Molecular structures of (a) 2-Tm and (b) 3-Tm at 100 K with selected atom labelling. Displacement ellipsoids set at 50% probability level, solvent of crystallization and hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Key: thulium, teal; silicon, orange; nitrogen, blue; fluorine, green; boron, yellow; carbon, grey.
Selected bond distances and angles of Ln{N(SiiPr3)2}2 moieties in 2-Ln and 3-Ln
| Complex | Ln–N/Å | N–Ln–N/° | Ln–X |
|
| 2.257(3), 2.228(3) | 131.02(8) | — |
|
| 2.156(2), 2.156(2) | 125.49(9) | — |
|
| 2.152(4), 2.144(5) | 127.7(2) | — |
|
| 2.295(2), 2.317(2) | 128.24(7) | 2.5813(7) |
|
| 2.219(2), 2.238(2) | 129.39(5) | 2.4832(5) |
|
| 2.226(3), 2.235(3) | 138.71(9) | 1.983(2) |
Fig. 2Room temperature UV-vis-NIR spectra of 2-Ln (1 mM in DCM) from 6200–35 000 cm–1.
Fig. 3Room temperature UV-vis-NIR spectra of 3-Ln (1 mM in THF) from 6200–35 000 cm–1. For 3-Sm, an empirical absorption correction of ε + 1.9 mol–1 dm3 cm–1 has been applied.
Room temperature χT values for 2-Ln and 3-Ln determined by Evans solution NMR method and solid-state SQUID magnetometry (1.0 T applied field for 2-Sm and 3-Sm; 0.1 T applied field for other compounds), with free-ion values [g2J(J + 1)/8], and values from CASSCF calculated electronic structures
| χ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Free-ion | 0.09 | 7.15 | 2.57 | 0.09 | 7.15 | 2.57 |
| Evans | 0.43 | 6.44 | 2.13 | 0.38 | 6.31 | 1.78 |
| SQUID | 0.23 | 6.86 | 1.98 | 0.24 | 6.31 | 1.93 |
| CASSCF | 0.29 | 6.88 | 2.24 | 0.29 | 6.85 | 2.24 |
Theoretical value for ground spin orbit multiplet in the absence of a ligand field.
Fig. 4c.w. X-band EPR spectra. (a) 1-Tm as a powder at 10 K;35 (b) 2-Yb as a powder (in eicosane) at 10 K; (c) 2-Yb in 1 mM DCM solution at 10 K (the feature at 320 mT is a background signal); (d) 3-Yb as a powder (in eicosane) at 10 K; (e) 3-Yb in 1 mM DCM solution at 10 K. Insert shows an expansion of the low field region of (d) and (e); these spectra are truncated as there are no features arising from 3-Yb at higher fields. Experimental spectra are in black, simulations are in red.
Comparison of EPR data and metrical parameters for isoelectronic 1-Tm, 2-Yb and 3-Yb
| Complex | N–Ln–N/° | Calculated | Measured | |||||||
| Solid state | Frozen solution | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 166.89(6) | 5.49 | 3.60 | 1.15 | 5.71 | 2.92 | 1.01 | 5.71 | 2.92 | 1.01 |
|
| 127.7(2) | 7.12 | 1.14 | 0.55 | 6.80 | 1.46 | 1.09 | 4.38 | 3.99 | 1.21 |
|
| 138.71(9) | 7.90 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 7.11 | — | — | 7.51 | — | — |
Fig. 5Orientation of the main magnetic axis (red dashed line) for 2-Yb (left) and 3-Yb (right).
Fig. 6CASSCF-SO calculated g‖ (black) and g⊥ (red) for the ground Kramers doublet of model structures based on 2-Yb as a function of the N–Ln–N angle (lines). CASSCF-SO values based on XRD experimental models (solid symbols) and experimental values (open symbols) for 2-Yb (squares) and the isoelectronic 1-Tm (circles). Given the rhombicity of the calculated g-tensor we defined g‖ as the unique value that is either larger or smaller than the average of the three g-values, while g⊥ is defined as the average value of the two remaining g-values.