Literature DB >> 32109810

How we assess water safety: A critical review of sanitary inspection and water quality analysis.

Emma R Kelly1, Ryan Cronk2, Emily Kumpel3, Guy Howard4, Jamie Bartram5.   

Abstract

Sanitary inspection is used in low-, medium- and high-income settings to assess the risk of microbial contamination at water sources. However, the relationship between sanitary inspection and water quality is not well understood. We conducted a critical literature review and synthesized the findings of 25 studies comparing the results of sanitary inspection and microbial water quality analysis. Most studies used sub-standard sanitary inspection and water quality analysis methods, and applied simplistic comparisons that do not characterize the complexity of the relationship. Sanitary risk score was used to represent sanitary inspection results in 21 (84%) studies; of which 12 (57%) found a significant association between score and microbial water quality and nine (43%) did not. Participatory sanitary inspection (12%) and reporting results back to communities (24%) were uncommon. Most studies relied on laboratory-based water quality analysis as an independently sufficient measure of safety, but reported inadequate quality control (52%) and/or sub-standard sample processing methods (66%). We found that sanitary inspections could contribute to improving water safety through four mechanisms: guiding remedial action at individual water sources, allowing operators and external support programs to prioritize repairs, identifying programmatic issues, and contributing to research. The purpose of the sanitary inspection should be considered when planning sanitary inspection execution, data analysis, and reporting to ensure appropriate methods are employed and results are fit for purpose. Further exploration should recognize that sanitary risk factors represent sources of contamination, pathways for contaminants to enter water supplies, and breakdowns in barriers to contamination. These different sanitary risk factor types have different and inter-dependent effects on water quality.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Microbial contamination; Risk assessment; Sanitary risk; Sanitary survey; Water quality assessment; Water source management

Year:  2020        PMID: 32109810     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  4 in total

Review 1.  Flow-Injection Methods in Water Analysis-Recent Developments.

Authors:  Marek Trojanowicz; Marta Pyszynska
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 4.411

2.  The utility of Escherichia coli as a contamination indicator for rural drinking water: Evidence from whole genome sequencing.

Authors:  Saskia Nowicki; Zaydah R deLaurent; Etienne P de Villiers; George Githinji; Katrina J Charles
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Water Treatment Using Natural Coagulant and Electrocoagulation Process: A Comparison Study.

Authors:  Tofik Gali Aba Lulesa; Dejene Beyene; Million Ebba; Goshu Kenea
Journal:  Int J Anal Chem       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 1.698

4.  Occurrence of waterborne pathogens and antibiotic resistance in water supply systems in a small town in Mozambique.

Authors:  Elisa Taviani; Harold van den Berg; Fernando Nhassengo; Eugenia Nguluve; Jussa Paulo; Olivia Pedro; Giuliana Ferrero
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 4.465

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.