Literature DB >> 32109459

Impact of quality of care on racial disparities in survival for endometrial cancer.

Allan B Huang1, Yongmei Huang1, Chin Hur2, Ana I Tergas2, Fady Khoury-Collado3, Alexander Melamed3, Caryn M St Clair3, June Y Hou3, Cande V Ananth4, Alfred I Neugut2, Dawn L Hershman2, Jason D Wright5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Black women experience poorer survival compared with white women across all endometrial cancer stages and histologies. The incidence of endometrial cancer is 30% lower in black women compared with white women, yet mortality is 80% higher in black women. Differences in adherence to evidence-based guidelines have been proposed to be major contributors to this disparity.
OBJECTIVES: We examined whether adherence to evidence-based treatment recommendations for endometrial cancer could mitigate survival disparities between black and white women. STUDY
DESIGN: The National Cancer Database was used to identify women with endometrial cancer treated from 2004 through 2016. We established 5 evidence-based quality metrics based on review of primary literature and accepted guidelines: surgical treatment within 6 weeks of diagnosis (Q1), use of minimally invasive surgery (stage I-IIIC; Q2), pelvic nodal assessment (high-risk tumors; Q3), adjuvant radiation (high intermediate risk; Q4), and systemic chemotherapy (stage III-IV; Q5). The rates of 30 and 90 day mortality and 5 year survival were compared between black and white women. To determine the influence of quality on outcomes, we compared outcomes among perfectly adherent black and white women with stage I and III endometrial cancer.
RESULTS: We identified 310,208 women including 35,035 (11.3%) black women and 275,173 (88.3%) white women. Black women were less likely than white women to receive Q1 (65.8 vs 75.6%), Q2 (58.5 vs 72.9%), Q3 (71.3 vs 74.2%), and Q5 (72.7 vs 73.2%) (P < .05 for all). Adherence to each quality metrics was associated with improved survival. Among women with stage I disease, perfect adherence to the relative quality metrics was seen in 53.1% of white and 41.5% of black women. Among perfectly adherent stage I patients, outcomes in black women improved relative to unselected black women; however, they still experienced higher risk of 30 day (adjusted relative risk, 2.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-3.90), 90 day (adjusted relative risk, 1.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-2.76), and 5 year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-1.59) compared with similar white women. Among women with stage III tumors, perfect adherence to the relative quality metrics was seen in 56.6% of white and 44.1% of black women. Perfectly adherent black women with stage III disease had improved outcomes but remained at increased risk of 30 day (adjusted relative risk, 1.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-3.44) and 5 year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.50) compared with white women.
CONCLUSION: Black women are less likely than white women with endometrial cancer to receive evidence-based care. However, receipt of evidence-based care mitigates but does not eliminate racial disparities in outcomes and black women remain at greater risk of death from endometrial cancer.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adherence; black; ethnicity; evidence-based care; guidelines; mortality; outcomes; uterine cancer; white

Year:  2020        PMID: 32109459     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

1.  Bioengineering Approaches to Improve Gynecological Cancer Outcomes.

Authors:  Ali Abbaspour; Andrea L Casillas; Stephanie M McGregor; Pamela K Kreeger
Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-03-30

2.  Healthcare Disparities in Gynecologic Oncology.

Authors:  Allison Grubbs; Emma L Barber; Dario R Roque
Journal:  Adv Oncol       Date:  2022-05-04

3.  More than treatment refusal: a National Cancer Database analysis of adjuvant treatment refusal and racial survival disparities among women with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  David A Barrington; Jennifer A Sinnott; Danaye Nixon; Tasleem J Padamsee; David E Cohn; Kemi M Doll; Macarius M Donneyong; Ashley S Felix
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 10.693

Review 4.  Disparities in gynecologic cancer incidence, treatment, and survival: a narrative review of outcomes among black and white women in the United States.

Authors:  Mary Towner; J Julie Kim; Melissa A Simon; Daniela Matei; Dario Roque
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.661

5.  Medicaid expansion and 2-year survival in women with gynecologic cancer: a difference-in-difference analysis.

Authors:  Sarah P Huepenbecker; Shuangshuang Fu; Charlotte C Sun; Hui Zhao; Kristin M Primm; Sharon H Giordano; Larissa A Meyer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 10.693

6.  Socioeconomic inequality and omission of adjuvant radiation therapy in high-risk, early-stage endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Leo Y Luo; Emeline M Aviki; Anna Lee; Marisa A Kollmeier; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; C Jillian Tsai; Kaled M Alektiar
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Disparities in cancer-specific and overall survival in black women with endometrial cancer: A Medicare-SEER study.

Authors:  Daniel H Saris; Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith; Colleen Brensinger; Sarah H Kim; Ashley F Haggerty; Nawar Latif; Lori Cory; Robert L Giuntoli; Mark A Morgan; Lilie L Lin; Emily M Ko
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-01-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.