Literature DB >> 32109448

Effectiveness of dulaglutide vs liraglutide and exenatide once-weekly. A real-world study and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Mario Luca Morieri1, Mauro Rigato2, Vera Frison3, Natalino Simioni3, Michele D'Ambrosio4, Federica Tadiotto4, Agostino Paccagnella2, Annunziata Lapolla5, Angelo Avogaro1, Gian Paolo Fadini6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Real-word data on the head-to-head comparisons among glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) are scant. Therefore, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of dulaglutide versus liraglutide and exenatide once weekly (exeOW) in type 2 diabetic (T2D) patients under routine care.
METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicenter, real-world study on patients with T2D (aged 18-80) initiating a GLP-1RA between 2010 and 2018 at specialist outpatient clinics. We compared the effectiveness of dulaglutide versus liraglutide and exeOW on the changes in HbA1c (primary outcome), body weight, blood pressure and fasting glucose (secondary outcomes). Average follow-up was 5.9 months. Channelling biases were addressed with propensity score matching or multivariable adjustment. Meta-analyses of observational studies, covering the same comparisons, are also presented.
RESULTS: 849, 1371 and 198 patients were included in the dulaglutide, liraglutide and exeOW groups, respectively. The reduction of HbA1c was greater with dulaglutide than with liraglutide (-0.24 ± 0.08%; p = 0.003), and was confirmed in the meta-analysis of observational studies. In our study, dulaglutide showed similar effectiveness compared to exeOW. When these results were pooled with other observational studies, dulaglutide showed a greater reduction of HbA1c (-0.19%; p = 0.003) and body weight (-0.8 kg; p = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world scenario, dulaglutide reduced HbA1c more than liraglutide. Conversely, we found similar effect of dulaglutide and exeOW, with statistical differences arising solely when results were meta-analysed with those from other observational studies. Lack of up-titration for liraglutide and higher discontinuation rate for exeOW likely influenced the estimated treatment difference.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Effectiveness; GLP-1; HbA1c; Observational; Propensity score matching; Real-word

Year:  2020        PMID: 32109448     DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Metabolism        ISSN: 0026-0495            Impact factor:   8.694


  4 in total

Review 1.  Long-Acting Injectable GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for the Treatment of Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: Perspectives from Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Mario Luca Morieri; Angelo Avogaro; Gian Paolo Fadini
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 3.249

2.  Comparative effectiveness of dulaglutide versus liraglutide in Asian type 2 diabetes patients: a multi-institutional cohort study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kai-Cheng Chang; Shih-Chieh Shao; Shihchen Kuo; Chen-Yi Yang; Hui-Yu Chen; Yuk-Ying Chan; Huang-Tz Ou
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 9.951

3.  Effectiveness and Tolerability of Once-Weekly GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Clinical Practice: A Focus on Switching Between Once-Weekly Molecules in Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Giulia Di Dalmazi; Sara Coluzzi; Maria Pompea Antonia Baldassarre; Amr Ghit; Giusi Graziano; Maria Chiara Rossi; Beatrice Ciappini; Marica Milo; Federica Carrieri; Antonio Nicolucci; Agostino Consoli; Gloria Formoso
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 6.055

4.  A Randomized, Open-Label Comparison of Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec Titration Strategies Versus Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100.

Authors:  Ildiko Lingvay; John B Buse; Edward Franek; Melissa V Hansen; Mette M Koefoed; Chantal Mathieu; Jeremy Pettus; Karolina Stachlewska; Julio Rosenstock
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 19.112

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.