Literature DB >> 32108918

Keratoconus detection by novel indices in patients with Down syndrome: a cohort population-based study.

Hassan Hashemi1, Mohammad Miraftab2, Kazem Amanzadeh1, Mohammad Amin Seyedian1, Riccardo Vinciguerra3, Renato Ambrósio4,5, Cynthia Roberts6, Ali Makateb1, Paolo Vinciguerra7,8, Soheila Asgari9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To use novel indices to determine the prevalence of KC and its progression in patients aged 10-30 years with Down syndrome. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort population-based study.
METHODS: Two hundred twenty-six of 250 invited Down syndrome patients were enrolled. The diagnostic criteria were confirmed by two independent expert examiners using slit-lamp examinations and topographic indices measured by Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgeräte): maximum keratometry centered on the steepest point (zonal Kmax-3 mm), Ambrósio's relational thickness (ART), inferior-superior asymmetry (IS-value), Belin/Ambrósio deviation value (BAD-D), the Tomographic and Biomechanical Index (TBI), and a posterior elevation map. In the KC cases, Corvis ST (Oculus Optikgeräte) was done. All the KC cases completed the second phase in 2017.
RESULTS: KC was identified in 28 patients (12.39%; 95% confidence interval: 8.2-17.9%): 20 bilateral and eight unilateral cases. Of these, 24 were in the ≤ 20-years age group, and four, in the > 20-years age group. The frequency of KC was not significantly correlated with age (P = 0.804) or gender (P = 0.322). In the KC cases, the mean zonal Kmax-3 mm, ART-max, IS-value, BAD-D, CBI, and TBI were 50.40 ± 5.88 D, 321.63 ± 111.94 μm, 1.99 ± 2.51, 3.73 ± 3.12, 0.54 ± 0.61, and 0.86 ± 0.20, respectively, and the minimum corneal thickness was 492.17 ± 42.67 μm. Of the 28 patients, 39.6% showed progression, and all were in the ≤ 20-years age group.
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of KC in Down syndrome patients is significantly higher than that reported in non-Down syndrome individuals of the same age groups. The progression rate is approximately similar to that of the non-Down syndrome population. Screening programs should be applied to prohibit serious visual impairment in these populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cornea biomechanics; Down syndrome; Keratoconus; Progressive keratoconus; Tomographic index

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32108918     DOI: 10.1007/s10384-020-00725-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0021-5155            Impact factor:   2.447


  6 in total

1.  Anterior pituitary, sex hormones, and keratoconus: Beyond traditional targets.

Authors:  Dimitrios Karamichos; Paulina Escandon; Brenda Vasini; Sarah E Nicholas; Lyly Van; Deanna H Dang; Rebecca L Cunningham; Kamran M Riaz
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 19.704

2.  Tomography-based definition of keratoconus for Down syndrome patients.

Authors:  Soheila Asgari; Shiva Mehravaran; Mohammadreza Aghamirsalim; Hassan Hashemi
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2020-10-05

3.  Effect of Down syndrome and keratoconus on corneal density and volume: a triple comparative study.

Authors:  Soheila Asgari; Mohammadreza Aghamirsalim; Shiva Mehravaran; Hassan Hashemi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Evidence of a Down Syndrome Keratopathy: A Three-Dimensional (3-D) Morphogeometric and Volumetric Analysis.

Authors:  Ibrahim Toprak; Francisco Cavas; Alfredo Vega; José S Velázquez; Jorge L Alio Del Barrio; Jorge L Alio
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-01-30

Review 5.  Prevalence of keratoconus in persons with Down syndrome: a review.

Authors:  Olav Kristianslund; Liv Drolsum
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-21

6.  Corneal characteristics in Down syndrome patients with normal and keratoconic cornea.

Authors:  Hassan Hashemi; Soheila Asgari
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.