| Literature DB >> 32108917 |
P Pousinis1, P R W Gowler2,3, J J Burston2,3, C A Ortori1, V Chapman4,5, D A Barrett1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of joint disease, causing pain and disability. Previous studies have demonstrated the role of lipid mediators in OA pathogenesis.Entities:
Keywords: Destabilisation of the medial meniscus; LC–MS lipidomics; Osteoarthritis; Pain
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32108917 PMCID: PMC7046574 DOI: 10.1007/s11306-020-01652-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabolomics ISSN: 1573-3882 Impact factor: 4.290
Fig. 1Multivariate analysis of global lipidomics in the DMM mouse model. a OPLS-DA score plot of plasma from DMM (n = 8, blue) and, sham mice (n = 7, green). The score plots show a good separation between DMM and sham mice (R2X = 0.547, R2Y = 0.794, and Q2 = 0.407). b V-plot with p(corr) and VIP values. Features with VIP > 1.5 and p(corr) >|0.4| are highlighted in red. c A permutation test performed with 100 random permutations on generated PLS-DA model; R2 is the explained variance, and Q2 is the predictive ability of the model. Low value of Q2-intercept depicts the high predictability of the model
Identification of the 24 significant lipids (top 18 are shown) in DMM plasma (n = 7 and 8 mice/group, for sham and DMM, respectively) using UHPLC-HR-MS global lipidomics platform and OPLS-DA analysis
| MS mode | Time (min) | VIP | Fold changea | Trendb | p valuec | Putative lipid biomarkerd | Confidence levele | Lipid class | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 318.240 | POS | 0.32 | 11.0 | 1.27 | ↑ | 0.00749 | NAE 16:2 | 3 | Fatty acyl |
| 296.258 | POS | 0.28 | 10.0 | 1.49 | ↑ | 0.00731 | FA(18:3) | 3 | Fatty acid |
| 369.351 | POS | 2.86 | 8.0 | 1.39 | ↑ | 0.00598 | Cholesterol | 3 | Sterol lipid |
| 282.279 | POS | 0.73 | 7.9 | 1.39 | ↑ | 0.00893 | LCB 18:2;1 | 3 | Sphingolipid |
| 690.619 | POS | 2.81 | 7.2 | 1.37 | ↑ | 0.00656 | 2 | Sterol lipid | |
| 666.618 | POS | 2.88 | 6.7 | 1.38 | ↑ | 0.00368 | 2 | Sterol lipid | |
| 844.609 | NEG | 2.15 | 5.5 | 1.26 | ↑ | 0.0164 | 2 | PC | |
| 613.492 | POS | 0.32 | 4.4 | 1.44 | ↑ | 0.00376 | CE(14:3) | 3 | Sterol lipid |
| 806.569 | POS | 1.45 | 4.4 | 1.17 | ↑ | 0.0129 | PC(38:6) | 3 | PC |
| 714.619 | POS | 2.77 | 4.2 | 1.43 | ↑ | 0.00841 | 2 | Sterol lipid | |
| 804.551 | POS | 1.53 | 3.3 | 1.19 | ↑ | 0.0190 | 2 | PC | |
| 473.401 | NEG | 1.37 | 2.8 | 1.07 | ↑ | 0.0130 | Sitosterol | 3 | Sterol lipid |
| 256.268 | POS | 0.6 | 2.7 | 1.24 | ↑ | 0.00797 | LCB 16:1;1 | 3 | Sphingolipid |
| 316.321 | POS | 0.79 | 2.6 | 1.13 | ↑ | 0.0217 | FA(19:0) | 3 | Fatty acid |
| 700.628 | POS | 2.72 | 2.3 | 1.43 | ↑ | 0.0114 | Cer 43:2;3 | 3 | Sphingolipid |
| 703.575 | POS | 1.53 | 2.2 | 1.39 | ↑ | 0.00680 | 2 | Sphingolipid | |
| 290.209 | POS | 0.27 | 1.8 | 1.31 | ↑ | 0.00866 | NAE 14:2 | 3 | Fatty acyl |
| 326.378 | POS | 0.66 | 1.8 | 1.45 | ↑ | 0.00334 | FA(22:1) | 3 | Fatty acid |
Lipids are sorted by their VIP scores (descending). Online databases METLIN, KEGG, HMDB and LIPIDMAPS were used to assign masses (m/z) to putative lipid species. Mass accuracy is considered less than 5 ppm. Fold change between DMM vs sham groups is shown. p values generated after applying FDR correction are given. Lipids identified by MS/MS experiments in Q Exactive with LipidSearch software) are highlighted in bold, when available. Lipid classes are also given
aDMM/sham group ratio (mean values from each group were used)
bDMM vs sham groups
cp value adjusted after FDR correction (5%) applied (GraphPrism v.6)
dLipid abbreviations: NAEN-acylethanolamine, FA fatty acid, LCB long-chain bases, CE cholesteryl ester, PC phosphocholine, Cer ceramide, SM sphingomyelin
Fig. 2Lipids discriminating DMM samples (red) from sham samples (green). Box-and-whisker plots illustrating levels differences for the six lipid biomarkers between DMM and sham groups of mice. Welch’s t-test was applied. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01
Fig. 3Comparison of different variables based on ROC curves a the legend shows the feature numbers and the AUCs of the five models, b the predictive accuracies with different features based on ROC curves, c the average importance of six lipids based on ROC curves, in descending order of importance, and d prediction of DMM and sham mice using MCCV analysis. The prediction of the model depends on the area under the curve (AUC) provided by ROC analysis: the greater the AUC, the better the prediction of the model
Fig. 4Summary of pathway analysis with MetPA: (a) steroid biosynthesis, (b) sphingolipid metabolism, (c) linoleic acid metabolism, (d) alpha-linolenic acid metabolism, (e) glycerophospholipid metabolism, and (f) arachidonic acid metabolism. The pathways depicted are listed from (a) to (f) in a descending order of importance, based on a combination of both the p values (y-axis) and impact (x-axis), according to Metabolic Pathway Analysis (MetPA) carried out in Metaboanalyst
Fig. 5Correlation between levels of lipid metabolites and weight bearing asymmetry (WB) 16 weeks post DMM/sham surgery. Data analysed by Pearson’s Correlation Co-efficient. A positive correlation for all lipid biomarkers was observed. P and r values are shown
Fig. 6Correlation between levels of lipid metabolites and log transformed ipsilateral hindpaw withdrawal thresholds 16 weeks post DMM/sham surgery. Data analysed by Pearson’s Correlation Co-efficient. A negative correlation for all lipid biomarkers was observed. P and r values are shown