Literature DB >> 32108595

A decade after introducing MPOWER, trend analysis of implementation of the WHO FCTC in the Eastern Mediterranean Region.

Gholamreza Heydari1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Perfect implementation of the six priority policies advocated by the MPOWER package is the most important challenge for member states (MS) to reach tobacco control goals.
METHODS: A validated checklist set according to the WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic was filled out five times based on biannual reports from 2011 to 2019 for 22 MS in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. It contained ten topics including smoking prevalence and seven elements of six MPOWER policies and compliances resulting with possible maximum score of 37. High score indicates better implementation.
RESULTS: The total score for the region increased from 416 in 2011 to 509 in 2019. Six countries (27% of the region) had more than 75% of total score, whereas 11 countries were between 50% and 75% and five countries had <50% of total score in 2019. In all five reports, Iran was ranked first in the region even in 2019, when it witnessed a 2 point decrease. Iran held the first place alongside with Pakistan and Saudi Arabia with 32 points. The highest score in the indicators was related to the monitoring, reaching from 35 in 2011 to 59 in 2019. The lowest score increase in the indicators was related to the Smoke-free Policy compliance and the prevalence of consumption, reaching from 18 to 20 and 44-48, respectively, between 2011 and 2019.
CONCLUSIONS: Although several remarkable achievements have been made regarding tobacco control goals, many policy implementation challenges remain and require urgent action by member states in the Eastern Mediterranean region.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Control; Eastern Mediterranean Region; FCTC; framework; tobacco

Year:  2020        PMID: 32108595      PMCID: PMC7065548          DOI: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_388_19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung India        ISSN: 0970-2113


INTRODUCTION

In the absence of effective tobacco control measures, consumption is likely to increase in many countries. Indeed, developing countries are facing an increased prevalence of tobacco consumption, but unlike developed countries have not yet faced the full burden of resulting illness and morbidity.[1] In the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR), according to the latest data, smoking prevalence is still increasing[2] and the waterpipe smoking as a new old fashion and hobby has many fans, especially in young adults.[34] In 2008, the WHO introduced a package of measures under the acronym of MPOWER with the aim of assisting all 193 member state (MS) to prioritize tobacco control measures while implementing the various provisions of the WHO FCTC with the ultimate aim of reducing global morbidity and mortality associated with tobacco use.[5] This package focuses on six evidence-based measures that have documented the highest impact on tobacco consumption: Monitoring tobacco use and prevention policies; Protecting people from tobacco smoke; Offering help to quit tobacco use; Warning about the dangers of tobacco; Enforcing bans on tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship; and Raising taxes on tobacco.[6] Global experience has demonstrated that implementation of these measures provides a favorable outcome by reducing tobacco consumption and its harmful health effects.[789] The WHO has published five reports on the Global Tobacco Epidemic in 2011, 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019 on the activities of all countries in relation to these six policies.[10] In EMR, few studies showed heterogeneous levels of implementations of the six elements of MPOWER.[11121314] Lessons can be learned from 10 years of implementing the WHO FCTC and the demonstrated benefit in combating NCDs.[151617] Cairney and Mamudu[18] reported that the ideal approach to tobacco control in a country requires specific policy processes: the department of health taking the policy lead; tobacco is “framed” as a public health problem; public health groups are consulted at the expense of tobacco control interests; socio-economic conditions are conducive to policy change; and the scientific evidence is “set in stone” within governments. No country can meet all these requirements in a short period and the gap between the expectations of implementing such programs and the reality of the current state of affairs is wide in many countries, particularly in EMR. A study[19] showed that the WHO FCTC implementation in the region did not improve drastically over the past years; there is failure of adopting stronger and more effective policies and reinforcing the already existing laws. This study aims to make a quantitative trend with conducting a comparative performance of EMR countries after a decade in their implementation of MPOWER policies. It also highlights some of the challenges facing them in adopting such effective plans.

METHODS

This was a comparative cross-sectional study which was conducted in July–September 2019. The data from the WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic focus on the EMR (MPOWER 2011, 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019)[6] were collected. A validated checklist which was designed in 4 previous studies[11121314] was used. The checklist contained 7 indicators with 5 options ranging from a minimum score of 0 to a maximum of 4, and 3 indicators ranging from a minimum score of 0 to a maximum of 3, resulting in a maximum possible score of 37. Each point for which data were not available was scored as 0. Consistent with the 4 previous studies, 2 trained raters administered the assessment (an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.8 was calculated between these 2 raters). Data entry was done by the first rater independently and was checked by the second rater. The principal investigator (GH) randomly selected 2 or 3 of the entered data to monitor their ratings. The scores were summed and the rankings calculated. The checklist, together with its scoring and scale, is shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Check list of MPOWER score on tobacco control in Eastern Mediterranean countries based on WHO report

IndicatorsScores
Adult daily smoking prevalence4
 Estimates not available0
 30% or more1
 From 20% to 29%2
 From 15% to 19%3
 <15%4
Monitoring: Prevalence data3
 No known data or no recent data or data that is not both recent and representative0
 Recent and representative data for either adults or youth1
 Recent and representative data for both adults and youth2
 Recent, representative and periodic data for both adults and youth3
Smoke - free policies4
 Data not reported0
 Up to two public places completely smoke-free1
 Three to five public places completely smoke-free2
 Six and seven public places completely smoke-free3
 All public places completely smoke-free4
Cessation programs4
 Data not reported0
 None1
 NRT and/or some cessation services (neither cost-covered)2
 NRT and/or some cessation services (at least one of which is cost-covered)3
 National quit line, and both NRT and some cessation services cost-covered4
Health warning on cigarette packages4
 Data no reported0
 No warnings or small warnings1
 Medium size warnings missing some appropriate characteristics2
 Medium size warnings with all appropriate characteristics3
 Large warnings with all appropriate characteristics4
Anti-tobacco mass media campaigns4
 Data not reported0
 No campaign conducted between January 2009 and August 20101
 Campaign conducted with 1-4 appropriate characteristics2
 Campaign conducted with 5-6 appropriate characteristics3
 Campaign conducted with all appropriate characteristics4
Advertising bans4
 Data not reported0
 Complete absence of ban print media1
 Ban on national television, radio and print media only2
 Ban on national television, radio and print media3
 Ban on all forms of direct and indirect advertising4
Taxation4
 Data not reported0
 ≤25% of retail price is tax1
 26%-50% of retail price is tax2
 51%-75% of retail price is tax3
 >75% of retail price is tax4
Compliance bans on advertising3
 Complete compliance (8/10-10/10)3
 Moderate compliance (3/10-7/10)2
 Minimal compliance (0/10-2/10)1
 Not report0
Compliance smoke-free policy3
 Complete compliance (8/10-10/10)3
 Moderate compliance (3/10-7/10)2
 Minimal compliance (0/10-2/10)1
 Not report0
Total37

NRT: Nicotine replacement therapy

Check list of MPOWER score on tobacco control in Eastern Mediterranean countries based on WHO report NRT: Nicotine replacement therapy

RESULTS

The total score for the region in 2011 was 416, whereas in 2019, the trend rose to 509 with 93 points increase. There was a 25-point decrease from 2013 to 2015, and a 43-point increase from 2015 to 2017. The highest score in the indicators was related to the monitoring, reaching from 35 in 2011 to 59 in 2019. The lowest score increase in the indicators was related to the prevalence of consumption, reaching from 44 in 2011 to 48 in 2019. In all five reports, Iran has been ranked first in the region even in 2019, which had a 2-point decrease; Iran held the first place alongside with Pakistan and Saudi Arabia with 32 points. The countries with the highest score increase were the UAE in 2019 and Lebanon in 2013 with 9-point increase, Kuwait and Oman with 7-point increase in 2013, Qatar and Saudi Arabia in 2019 and Pakistan in 2015 with 6-point increase, respectively. Mean score of the region increase from 18.90 in 2011 to 23.13 in 2019. In 2019, 6 countries (27% of the region) had more than 75% of total score, whereas 11 countries were between 50% and 75% and 5 countries had <50% of total score. In 2017, 2 countries (9% of the region) had more than 75% of total score, whereas 16 countries were between 50% and 75% and 4 countries had <50% of total score. In 2015, 2 countries (9% of the region) had more than 75% of total score, whereas 11 countries were between 50% and 75% and 9 countries had <50% of total score. In 2013, 3 countries (14% of the region) had more than 75% of total score, whereas 11 countries were between 50% and 75% and 8 countries had <50% of total score. In 2011, 2 countries (9% of the region) had more than 75% of total score, whereas 10 countries were between 50% and 75% and 10 countries had <50% of total score. The comparison of the 10 main indicators is demonstrated in Table 2. Comparison of the scores flow from 2011 to 2019 is presented in Table 3. The scores of the 6 MPOWER indicators in 2011–2019 are listed in Tables 4-9, respectively.
Table 2

Trend of total score of 10 indicators of the WHO MPOWER by 5 reports in Eastern Mediterranean Region countries

IndicatorTotal scores
20192017201520132011
Smoking prevalence4842253944
Monitoring5951363535
Smoke-free policies5451514944
Smoke-free policy compliance2015183018
Cessation programs5960605754
Health warning on cigarette packages5353504835
Mass media campaigns4538473738
Advertising bans7373676366
Advertising bans compliance4941315534
Taxation4947434443
Total (region)509471428453416
Table 3

Trend of MPOWER scores on tobacco control by 5 WHO reports in Eastern Mediterranean Region countries, ranked based on 2019

CountryTotal scores
20192017201520132011
Iran (IR)3234333129
Pakistan3231272120
Saudi Arabia3226232319
Egypt2925292828
Qatar2822212118
UAE2819161724
Yemen2727221717
Lebanon2524242617
Morocco2422221717
Bahrain2419152221
Iraq2418151815
Jordan2323232221
Kuwait2222232821
Gaza and West bank2220212520
Oman2220152114
Tunisia2218202117
Libya1918232221
Syrian Arab Republic1820121718
Afghanistan171912139
Sudan1712161319
Djibouti1522212520
Somalia77467
Total (region)509471428453416
Table 4

Trend of the score of Monitor tobacco use, M (MPOWER), by country and year, based on 5 WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic in Eastern Mediterranean Region

CountryYear
20192017201520132011
Iran (IR)44333
Pakistan44310
Saudi Arabia23212
Egypt44332
Qatar44322
UAE32111
Yemen23211
Lebanon44223
Morocco32113
Iraq32121
Bahrain22011
Jordan22133
Gaza and West bank22320
Oman31132
Kuwait44312
Tunisia31112
Libya11222
Syrian Arab Republic11111
Afghanistan20000
Sudan31111
Djibouti23213
Somalia11000
Total5951353335
Table 9

Trend of the score of Rise taxes on tobacco, R (MPOWER), by country and year, based on 5 WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic in Eastern Mediterranean Region

CountryYear
20192017201520132011
Iran (IR)11111
Pakistan33333
Saudi Arabia22112
Egypt43433
Qatar21112
UAE31112
Yemen33333
Lebanon22222
Morocco33330
Iraq13111
Bahrain32212
Jordan44443
Gaza and West bank44444
Oman21112
Kuwait11212
Tunisia33343
Libya11111
Syrian Arab Republic23032
Afghanistan10111
Sudan33333
Djibouti02212
Somalia11011
Total4947434443
Trend of total score of 10 indicators of the WHO MPOWER by 5 reports in Eastern Mediterranean Region countries Trend of MPOWER scores on tobacco control by 5 WHO reports in Eastern Mediterranean Region countries, ranked based on 2019 Trend of the score of Monitor tobacco use, M (MPOWER), by country and year, based on 5 WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic in Eastern Mediterranean Region Trend of the score of Protect people from tobacco smoke, P (MPOWER), by country and year, based on 5 WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic in Eastern Mediterranean Region Trend of the score of Offer help to quit tobacco use, O (MPOWER), by country and year, based on 5 WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic in Eastern Mediterranean Region Trend of the score of Warn about dangers of tobacco, W (MPOWER), (health warning on cigarette packages + mass media campaigns) by country and year, based on 5 WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic in Eastern Mediterranean Region Trend of the score of Enforce ban on tobacco advertising, E (MPOWER), by country and year, based on 5 WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic in Eastern Mediterranean Region Trend of the score of Rise taxes on tobacco, R (MPOWER), by country and year, based on 5 WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic in Eastern Mediterranean Region

DISCUSSION

This study found that during the last 10 years the implementation of the MPOWER package in EMR countries was considered important by governments and some achievements were done (score of the region increase from 416 in 2011 to 509 in 2019), but many challenges remain ahead in tobacco control programs (to reach 37 × 22 = 814 perfectly). The Islamic Republic of Iran and Egypt continued its status and Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, UAE, and Qatar improved their scores. Many others tried to keep their better status and Somalia had no improvement. More tobacco control programs have been recently introduced in EMR but they need more time to realize their effectiveness. Here was no enough increasing trend score for Smoke-free Policy compliance and smoking prevalence so it seems that these activities were not effective completely to decrease tobacco consumption in EMR and protect people from second-hand smoke. In 2019, only 6 countries (27% of the region) had more than 75% of total score, while 11 countries were between 50% and 75% and 5 countries had <50%. It was show that the numbers of country which have 75% of score were increased three times compare with 2017. It is notable that an increasing trend from 50% to 75% and more was seen in these countries. Few documents showed that about 50% of the European countries had more than 75% of scores.[2021] In 2019 UAE, Saudi Arabia and Qatar had improve their scores plus 9, 6, and 6, respectively, to show high achievements. In 2015, the Islamic Republic of Iran and Egypt continued to compare favorably with other countries in the region. In 2017, the score of Pakistan, Yemen, and Saudi Arabia were increased and Egypt is the fifth highest. The scores of Libya and Sudan decreased from 2015 to 2017. The scores of Djibouti, UAE, Bahrain, Oman, Syrian, Afghanistan, and Somalia all increased from 2015 to 2017. It is therefore important that EMR countries, particularly those with a drop in their scores, reexamine their performance in order to have stronger comprehensive national tobacco control plans that incorporate the six key policies of MPOWER. Our finding show that the trend of score for monitoring tobacco use was the highest[22] compare with others and for pictorial health warning was second.[18] For advertising ban compliance, smoke free policy, mass media campaigns and advertising ban were 15, 10, 7, and 7, respectively. However, the trend of score for remain 4 indicators such as smoking prevalence, smoke free policy compliance, cessation program, and tobacco taxation were not change significantly during a decade. In 2006, Joossens and Raw[20] compared tobacco control scores in European countries through a checklist. European region has an acceptable implementation on tobacco control program compare with others.[21] The same methodology was followed previously in comparing 22 Eastern Mediterranean countries, in which the Islamic Republic of Iran, Jordan and Egypt received the highest scores.[19] Furthermore, we found that some MS have achieved improved scores in tobacco control while some MS have failed to demonstrate substantial improvement. Of particular importance is the fact that tobacco taxation programs have been unsuccessful even in countries with high overall scores, such as the Islamic Republic of Iran which had an acceptable achievement in smoking cessation,[23] was unsuccessful in implementing a tobacco taxation program like 10 of 22 Eastern Mediterranean countries, during the past 10 years. The Islamic Republic of Iran as well as many other MS needs to increase taxation rates to improve the overall performance in effective tobacco control measures. Another example is Egypt which has high overall score yet it did not score well in smoke-free policies; consequently, more effective reinforcement measures need to be undertaken. At the same time, many policies remain unchanged such as the Graphic Health Warnings implementation with no progress in size and combating the waterpipe smoking or youth smoking initiation.[2324252627] This study has some limitations. The MPOWER report did not refer specifically to waterpipe and other forms of tobacco smoking. Political, social, and economic environmental variables that are supportive or act as barriers to tobacco control were not investigated in this study. These factors should be investigated in future studies. The interference by the tobacco industry to the implementation of the control programs is not well reflected in such surveys.

CONCLUSIONS

Although remarkable achievements have been gained over the past 10 years, many challenges remain ahead. To overcome them reinforcement of stronger measures should be adopted as part of comprehensive national plans that take in consideration all social and economic variables. A more favorable outcome can be achieved through greater coordination and cooperation of the countries of the region by drawing common control strategies as already experienced successfully in other WHO regions in their fight against this global epidemic.

Recommendation

The region has to work more on full implementation of FCTC to reach 814 score. Smoke-free policy compliance is the most challenging indicator for the region. Somalia and Sudan must consider tobacco control as a top priority in their health program. Some countries such as Iran, Kuwait, Iraq, and Libya must work more on tobacco taxation. For some countries such as Egypt, UAE, Oman, Kuwait, Libya, Afghanistan, and Djibouti mass media campaigns are important to work. Health warning on cigarette packages must change in Morocco, Gaza, and Syria.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
Table 5

Trend of the score of Protect people from tobacco smoke, P (MPOWER), by country and year, based on 5 WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic in Eastern Mediterranean Region

CountryYear
20192017201520132011
Iran (IR)44444
Pakistan44444
Saudi Arabia32431
Egypt42223
Qatar11111
UAE00022
Yemen33311
Lebanon44442
Morocco22222
Iraq22211
Bahrain10011
Jordan22222
Gaza and West bank44443
Oman11101
Kuwait22331
Tunisia11111
Libya44444
Syrian Arab Republic33333
Afghanistan44222
Sudan12111
Djibouti33333
Somalia11111
Total5451514944
Table 6

Trend of the score of Offer help to quit tobacco use, O (MPOWER), by country and year, based on 5 WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic in Eastern Mediterranean Region

CountryYear
20192017201520132011
Iran (IR)34444
Pakistan33322
Saudi Arabia43334
Egypt33333
Qatar33333
UAE44444
Yemen22221
Lebanon33332
Morocco22222
Iraq33322
Bahrain33334
Jordan33333
Gaza and West bank22222
Oman23322
Kuwait44443
Tunisia33332
Libya33332
Syrian Arab Republic33333
Afghanistan22222
Sudan21111
Djibouti12222
Somalia11111
Total5960605754
Table 7

Trend of the score of Warn about dangers of tobacco, W (MPOWER), (health warning on cigarette packages + mass media campaigns) by country and year, based on 5 WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic in Eastern Mediterranean Region

CountryYear
20192017201520132011
Iran (IR)67854
Pakistan87644
Saudi Arabia75453
Egypt55788
Qatar73442
UAE46633
Yemen54534
Lebanon43655
Morocco45225
Iraq64322
Bahrain55474
Jordan66335
Gaza and West bank42312
Oman44442
Kuwait44674
Tunisia45553
Libya22522
Syrian Arab Republic22241
Afghanistan24221
Sudan22423
Djibouti54755
Somalia22121
Total9891978573
Table 8

Trend of the score of Enforce ban on tobacco advertising, E (MPOWER), by country and year, based on 5 WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic in Eastern Mediterranean Region

CountryYear
20192017201520132011
Iran (IR)44444
Pakistan33311
Saudi Arabia43113
Egypt33433
Qatar44334
UAE44434
Yemen44433
Lebanon33331
Morocco33333
Iraq33333
Bahrain44443
Jordan33334
Gaza and West bank23333
Oman33111
Kuwait44344
Tunisia33333
Libya44443
Syrian Arab Republic33334
Afghanistan44333
Sudan33334
Djibouti44444
Somalia11111
Total7373676366
  19 in total

1.  The Tobacco Control Scale: a new scale to measure country activity.

Authors:  L Joossens; M Raw
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  WHO MPOWER tobacco control scores in the Eastern Mediterranean countries based on the 2011 report.

Authors:  Gh Heydari; F Talischi; H Algouhmani; H A Lando; A Ebn Ahmady
Journal:  East Mediterr Health J       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.628

3.  Pulmonary function tests and respiratory symptoms among smokers in the city of Mashhad (north east of Iran).

Authors:  M H Boskabady; M Mahmoodinia; M Boskabady; G R Heydari
Journal:  Rev Port Pneumol       Date:  2011-06-14

4.  Comparison of tobacco control policies in the Eastern Mediterranean countries based on Tobacco Control Scale scores.

Authors:  G Heydari; F Talischi; M R Masjedi; H Alguomani; L Joossens; M Ghafari
Journal:  East Mediterr Health J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.628

5.  Tobacco control laws in Pakistan and their implementation: A pilot study in Karachi.

Authors:  Javaid Ahmed Khan; Abdul Malik Amir Humza Sohail; Muhammad Arslan Arif Maan
Journal:  J Pak Med Assoc       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.781

Review 6.  MPOWER, needs and challenges: trends in the implementation of the WHO FCTC in the Eastern Mediterranean Region.

Authors:  Gholamreza Heydari; Ghazi Zaatari; Jawad A Al-Lawati; Fatimah El-Awa; Heba Fouad
Journal:  East Mediterr Health J       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 1.628

7.  Moving away from the comfort zone of tobacco control policies to the highest level of implementation.

Authors:  Fatimah El-Awa; Prasad Vinayak; Douglas Bettcher
Journal:  East Mediterr Health J       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 1.628

8.  The second study on WHO MPOWER tobacco control scores in Eastern Mediterranean Countries based on the 2013 report: improvements over two years.

Authors:  Gholamreza Heydari; Arezoo Ebn Ahmady; Harry A Lando; Mohammad B Shadmehr; Lida Fadaizadeh
Journal:  Arch Iran Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.354

9.  Comparison of Tobacco Control Programs Worldwide: A Quantitative Analysis of the 2015 World Health Organization MPOWER Report.

Authors:  Gholamreza Heydari; Fahimeh Chamyani; Mohammad Reza Masjedi; Lida Fadaizadeh
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2016-12-12

10.  The effect of tobacco control measures during a period of rising cardiovascular disease risk in India: a mathematical model of myocardial infarction and stroke.

Authors:  Sanjay Basu; Stanton Glantz; Asaf Bitton; Christopher Millett
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  1 in total

1.  Global Implementation of Tobacco Demand Reduction Measures Specified in Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.

Authors:  Heikki Hiilamo; Stanton Glantz
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.244

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.