Literature DB >> 32108343

Sickness effects on social interactions depend on the type of behaviour and relationship.

Sebastian Stockmaier1,2, Daniel I Bolnick1,3, Rachel A Page2, Gerald G Carter2,4.   

Abstract

Infections can change social behaviour in multiple ways, with profound impacts on pathogen transmission. However, these impacts might depend on the type of behaviour, how sociality as a biological trait is defined (e.g. network degree vs. mean edge strength) and the type of social relationship between the interacting individuals. We used the highly social common vampire bat Desmodus rotundus to test how an immune challenge by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injections affects two different social behaviours and three alternate measures of sociality, and whether the LPS effect differs by kinship relationship. Effects of sickness should be lower for social behaviours that bestow greater benefits to inclusive fitness, such as food sharing. As predicted, immune-challenged bats experienced a greater reduction in allogrooming received than food sharing received. Sickness effects might also depend on how a social interaction is defined (e.g. the number of grooming partners vs. the duration of grooming events). We predicted that sickness would impact both the number and duration of social encounters, but we only detected a decrease in the number of grooming partners. Finally, sickness effects might vary with social relationship type. We predicted that sickness effects should be smaller for interactions among close kin. As expected, the immune challenge had smaller effects on mother-offspring interactions. In conclusion, our results highlight the need to explicitly consider how the effects of sickness on social network structure can differ depending on the 'who, what, and how' of social interactions, because these factors are likely to influence how sickness behaviour alters pathogen transmission.
© 2020 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  pathogen transmission; sickness behaviour; social behaviour; social network; vampire bat

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32108343     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  13 in total

1.  Immune-challenged vampire bats produce fewer contact calls.

Authors:  Sebastian Stockmaier; Daniel I Bolnick; Rachel A Page; Darija Josic; Gerald G Carter
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  Social effects of rabies infection in male vampire bats (Desmodus rotundus).

Authors:  Elsa M Cárdenas-Canales; Sebastian Stockmaier; Eleanor Cronin; Tonie E Rocke; Jorge E Osorio; Gerald G Carter
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 3.812

3.  Insular cortex modulates social avoidance of sick rats.

Authors:  Nathaniel S Rieger; Nicholas B Worley; Alexandra J Ng; John P Christianson
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Male and female reproductive fitness costs of an immune response in natural populations.

Authors:  Stephen P De Lisle; Daniel I Bolnick
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.171

5.  An amygdala circuit that suppresses social engagement.

Authors:  Changhyeon Ryu; Hyeseung Lee; Jeong-Tae Kwon; Alec Sheffield; Jingxuan Fan; Daniel H Cho; Shivani Bigler; Heather A Sullivan; Han Kyung Choe; Ian R Wickersham; Myriam Heiman; Gloria B Choi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 69.504

6.  Sick bats stay home alone: fruit bats practice social distancing when faced with an immunological challenge.

Authors:  Kelsey R Moreno; Maya Weinberg; Lee Harten; Valeria B Salinas Ramos; L Gerardo Herrera M; Gábor Á Czirják; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 6.499

7.  How territoriality reduces disease transmission among social insect colonies.

Authors:  Natalie Lemanski; Matthew Silk; Nina Fefferman; Oyita Udiani
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.944

8.  Group size and modularity interact to shape the spread of infection and information through animal societies.

Authors:  Julian C Evans; David J Hodgson; Neeltje J Boogert; Matthew J Silk
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Combining epidemiological and ecological methods to quantify social effects on Escherichia coli transmission.

Authors:  Trevor S Farthing; Daniel E Dawson; Mike W Sanderson; Hannah Seger; Cristina Lanzas
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 3.653

10.  Sickness and the Social Brain: Love in the Time of COVID.

Authors:  Caroline J Smith; Staci D Bilbo
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 5.435

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.