Literature DB >> 32107733

Validation of the 2HELPS2B Seizure Risk Score in Acute Brain Injury Patients.

Eric W Moffet1,2, Thanujaa Subramaniam1, Lawrence J Hirsch3, Emily J Gilmore3, Jong Woo Lee4, Andres A Rodriguez-Ruiz5, Hiba A Haider5, Monica B Dhakar5, Neville Jadeja6, Gamaledin Osman7, Nicolas Gaspard3,8, Aaron F Struck9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Seizures are common after traumatic brain injury (TBI), aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), subdural hematoma (SDH), and non-traumatic intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH)-collectively defined herein as acute brain injury (ABI). Most seizures in ABI are subclinical, meaning that they are only detectable with EEG. A method is required to identify patients at greatest risk of seizures and thereby in need of prolonged continuous EEG monitoring. 2HELPS2B is a simple point system developed to address this need. 2HELPS2B estimates seizure risk for hospitalized patients using five EEG findings and one clinical finding (pre-EEG seizure). The initial 2HELPS2B study did not specifically assess the ABI subpopulation. In this study, we aim to validate the 2HELPS2B score in ABI and determine its relative predictive accuracy compared to a broader set of clinical and electrographic factors.
METHODS: We queried the Critical Care EEG Monitoring Research Consortium database for ABI patients age ≥ 18 with > 6 h of continuous EEG monitoring; data were collected between February 2013 and November 2018. The primary outcome was electrographic seizure. Clinical factors considered were age, coma, encephalopathy, ABI subtype, and acute suspected or confirmed pre-EEG clinical seizure. Electrographic factors included 18 EEG findings. Predictive accuracy was assessed using a machine-learning paradigm with area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve as the primary outcome metric. Three models (clinical factors alone, EEG factors alone, EEG and clinical factors combined) were generated using elastic-net logistic regression. Models were compared to each other and to the 2HELPS2B model. All models were evaluated by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) of a ROC analysis and then compared using permutation testing of AUC with bootstrapping to generate confidence intervals.
RESULTS: A total of 1528 ABI patients were included. Total seizure incidence was 13.9%. Seizure incidence among ABI subtype varied: IPH 17.2%, SDH 19.1%, aSAH 7.6%, TBI 9.2%. Age ≥ 65 (p = 0.015) and pre-cEEG acute clinical seizure (p < 0.001) positively affected seizure incidence. Clinical factors AUC = 0.65 [95% CI 0.60-0.71], EEG factors AUC = 0.82 [95% CI 0.77-0.87], and EEG and clinical factors combined AUC = 0.84 [95% CI 0.80-0.88]. 2HELPS2B AUC = 0.81 [95% CI 0.76-0.85]. The 2HELPS2B AUC did not differ from EEG factors (p = 0.51), or EEG and clinical factors combined (p = 0.23), but was superior to clinical factors alone (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Accurate seizure risk forecasting in ABI requires the assessment of EEG markers of pathologic electro-cerebral activity (e.g., sporadic epileptiform discharges and lateralized periodic discharges). The 2HELPS2B score is a reliable and simple method to quantify these EEG findings and their associated risk of seizure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2HELPS2B; Acute brain injury; Continuous EEG; Critical care EEG; Seizure

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32107733     DOI: 10.1007/s12028-020-00939-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurocrit Care        ISSN: 1541-6933            Impact factor:   3.210


  1 in total

1.  Assessment of the Validity of the 2HELPS2B Score for Inpatient Seizure Risk Prediction.

Authors:  Aaron F Struck; Mohammad Tabaeizadeh; Sarah E Schmitt; Andres Rodriguez Ruiz; Christa B Swisher; Thanujaa Subramaniam; Christian Hernandez; Safa Kaleem; Hiba A Haider; Abbas Fodé Cissé; Monica B Dhakar; Lawrence J Hirsch; Eric S Rosenthal; Sahar F Zafar; Nicholas Gaspard; M Brandon Westover
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 18.302

  1 in total
  5 in total

1.  Can Big Data guide prognosis and clinical decisions in epilepsy?

Authors:  Xiaojin Li; Licong Cui; Guo-Qiang Zhang; Samden D Lhatoo
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 5.864

Review 2.  Pharmacotherapy for Nonconvulsive Seizures and Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus.

Authors:  Pablo Bravo; Aparna Vaddiparti; Lawrence J Hirsch
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  DIagnostic Subdural EEG electrodes And Subdural hEmatoma (DISEASE): a study protocol for a prospective nonrandomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Adam Strzelczyk; Juergen Konczalla; Sae-Yeon Won; Thomas M Freiman; Philipp S Reif; Daniel Dubinski; Elke Hattingen; Eva Herrmann; Volker Seifert; Felix Rosenow
Journal:  Neurol Res Pract       Date:  2020-12-15

Review 4.  Adult Critical Care Electroencephalography Monitoring for Seizures: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Sonali Sharma; Michelle Nunes; Ayham Alkhachroum
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.086

5.  Prediction and Risk Assessment Models for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review on Case Studies.

Authors:  Jewel Sengupta; Robertas Alzbutas
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.