Carlos Miguel Chiesa-Estomba1,2, Marco Ravanelli3, Davide Farina3, Marc Remacle4, Ricard Simo5, Giorgio Peretti6, Elizabeth Sjogren7, Jon Alexander Sistiaga-Suarez8,9, Jose Angel Gónzalez-García8,9, Ehkiñe Larruscain8,9, Cesare Piazza10. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Calle General Lertsundi, #6, 5to Izquierda, Izquierda. CP., 20007, Donostia-San Sebasián, Spain. chiesaestomba86@gmail.com. 2. Head and Neck Study Group of Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Marseille, France. chiesaestomba86@gmail.com. 3. Radiology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy. 4. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Centre Hospitalier du Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg. 5. Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, UK. 6. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy. 7. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 8. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Calle General Lertsundi, #6, 5to Izquierda, Izquierda. CP., 20007, Donostia-San Sebasián, Spain. 9. Head and Neck Study Group of Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Marseille, France. 10. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Maxillofacial and Thyroid Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS, National Cancer Institute of Milan, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The modern availability in daily practice of different DICOM viewers allows physicians to routinely evaluate computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) scans of patients in the pre-, intra-, and postoperative settings. Their systematic use, together with a close surgeon-radiologist cooperation, may greatly improve outcomes of patients to be treated by transoral microsurgery for laryngeal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We herein propose guidelines for systematic evaluation of CT/MR images taken from patients affected by supraglottic and glottic cancer to be treated by transoral microsurgery. RESULTS: A methodical, step-by-step approach focused on laryngeal anatomy, systematically looking at each true and false vocal folds, anterior commissure, laryngeal ventricle, subglottic area, epiglottis, thyroid, cricoid, and arytenoid cartilages, posterior commissure, crico-arytenoid unit, paraglottic and pre-epiglottic spaces, and possible extra-laryngeal extension is proposed. This checklist may be useful before imaging performance (to focus on specific issues to be detailed by the radiologist), as well before and during surgery for the specific evaluation of details to be cleared during transoral microsurgery. CONCLUSION: Detailed preoperative evaluation of supraglottic and glottic anatomy is essential prior to any transoral approach for neoplastic disease. The proposed imaging checklist described herein represents a step-by-step guide to surgeons performing this kind of interventions and an aid in achieving a meticulous approach from a surgical perspective.
INTRODUCTION: The modern availability in daily practice of different DICOM viewers allows physicians to routinely evaluate computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) scans of patients in the pre-, intra-, and postoperative settings. Their systematic use, together with a close surgeon-radiologist cooperation, may greatly improve outcomes of patients to be treated by transoral microsurgery for laryngeal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We herein propose guidelines for systematic evaluation of CT/MR images taken from patients affected by supraglottic and glottic cancer to be treated by transoral microsurgery. RESULTS: A methodical, step-by-step approach focused on laryngeal anatomy, systematically looking at each true and false vocal folds, anterior commissure, laryngeal ventricle, subglottic area, epiglottis, thyroid, cricoid, and arytenoid cartilages, posterior commissure, crico-arytenoid unit, paraglottic and pre-epiglottic spaces, and possible extra-laryngeal extension is proposed. This checklist may be useful before imaging performance (to focus on specific issues to be detailed by the radiologist), as well before and during surgery for the specific evaluation of details to be cleared during transoral microsurgery. CONCLUSION: Detailed preoperative evaluation of supraglottic and glottic anatomy is essential prior to any transoral approach for neoplastic disease. The proposed imaging checklist described herein represents a step-by-step guide to surgeons performing this kind of interventions and an aid in achieving a meticulous approach from a surgical perspective.
Authors: Felice D'Arco; Livja Mertiri; Pim de Graaf; Bert De Foer; Katarina S Popovič; Maria I Argyropoulou; Kshitij Mankad; Hervé J Brisse; Amy Juliano; Mariasavina Severino; Sofie Van Cauter; Mai-Lan Ho; Caroline D Robson; Ata Siddiqui; Steve Connor; Sotirios Bisdas Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2022-04-23 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Frederik G Dikkers; Michel R M San Giorgi; Rico N P M Rinkel; Marc Remacle; Antoine Giovanni; Małgorzata Wierzbicka; Riaz Seedat; Guillermo Campos; Guri S Sandhu Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2022-07-12 Impact factor: 3.236
Authors: Arne Böttcher; Christian S Betz; Stefan Bartels; Bjoern Schoennagel; Adrian Münscher; Lara Bußmann; Chia-Jung Busch; Steffen Knopke; Eric Bibiza; Nikolaus Möckelmann Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2020-08-18 Impact factor: 4.553