Literature DB >> 32106807

Clinical Effectiveness of a High Dose Versus the Standard Dose of Meropenem in Ventilator-associated Pneumonia Caused by Multidrugresistant Bacteria: A Randomized, Single-blind Clinical Trial.

Mahila Monajati1, Shahram Ala1, Masoud Aliyali2, Roya Ghasemian3, Fatemeh Heidari4, Mohammad Ahanjan5, Siavash Moradi6, Ali Sharifpour7, Mojtaba Mojtahedzadeh8, Ebrahim Salehifar1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Meropenem standard doses are based on the minimum inhibitory concentration of sensitive pathogens and the pharmacokinetic parameter of not critically ill patients. We compared the efficacy of high versus standard dose of meropenem in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). ;
Methods: 24 out of 34 eligible patients were randomized to receive meropenem 3 g q8h (high dose group, 11 patients) or 2 g q8h (standard-dose group, 13 patients) as a 3h infusion. The primary outcome was considered as clinical success that was defined as stable hemodynamic, improved sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, stable or improved PaO2/FiO2 after 7 days. Sputum culture was taken before the intervention. ;
Results: Clinical success rate was not significantly different between the high and standard-dose group (54.5% vs. 38.5%, P= 0.431). There was a significant difference in the reduction of clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) compared to a high dose to the standard group (P=0.038). SOFA score declined significantly in the high dose group throughout the study (P=0.006). A shorter duration of VAP treatment was recorded in the high dose group (P=0.061). We did not observe any significant adverse event related to meropenem. Acinetobacter spp. (34.8%), Klebsiella spp. (32.6%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (19.5%) isolated more frequently from sputum cultures. ;
Conclusion: Treatment with the high dose of meropenem seems to be safe. However, it did not provide a significantly higher clinical success rate in comparison with the standard dose, but could be considered as an appropriate empirical treatment in patients with severe infection due to reduction in SOFA and CPIS. ; The trial protocol was registered with IRCT.ir (registration number IRCT2010010700 3014N19 in April 2018). Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Meropenem; critically ill; gram-negative pathogens; intensive care unit.; ventilator-associated pneumonia

Year:  2021        PMID: 32106807     DOI: 10.2174/1871526520666200227102013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Disord Drug Targets        ISSN: 1871-5265


  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of Empirical Meropenem Bolus Protocol in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A Three-Year Analysis in Tertiary Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  I Wayan Suranadi; Putu Agus Surya Panji; Ni Nyoman Sri Budayanti; Tjokorda Gde Agung Senapathi; Arif Budiman Susatya
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-11-09

2.  Differentiation Between Acinetobacter Baumannii Colonization and Infection and the Clinical Outcome Prediction by Infection in Lower Respiratory Tract.

Authors:  Ding-Yun Feng; Jian-Xia Zhou; Xia Li; Wen-Bin Wu; Yu-Qi Zhou; Tian-Tuo Zhang
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 4.177

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.