| Literature DB >> 32106422 |
Hachidai Aizawa1, Hideo Kawabata1, Atsushi Sato1, Hideo Masuki1, Taisuke Watanabe1, Tetsuhiro Tsujino1, Kazushige Isobe1, Masayuki Nakamura1, Koh Nakata2, Tomoyuki Kawase3.
Abstract
It is generally accepted that citrate or the A-form of acid-citrate-dextrose (ACD-A) are suitable for preparing platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for regenerative therapy. However, this is based on evidence from blood transfusions and not from regenerative medicine. Thus, we examined the effects of anticoagulants, such as ACD-A, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and heparin, on the regenerative quality of PRP to address this gap. The blood samples were collected in the presence of anticoagulants and were processed to prepare pure-PRP. Platelet size, activation status, and intra-platelet free Ca2+ concentration were determined while using a hematology analyzer and flow cytometer. Platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB) was quantified while using an ELISA. In pure-PRP samples, EDTA caused platelet swelling and activation, but yielded the highest number of platelets. Heparin aggregated platelets and disturbed the overall counting of blood cells. However, no significant differences in PDGF-BB levels were observed among the anticoagulants tested. Moreover, when considering the easy preparation of platelet suspensions, without the need for high-level pipetting skills, these findings suggest the comparable potency of EDTA-derived pure-PRP in tissue regeneration and support the use of EDTA in the preparation of pure-PRP. Further in vivo studies are required in animal models to exclude the possible negative effects of including EDTA in pure-PRP preparations.Entities:
Keywords: ACD-A; EDTA; PDGF; anticoagulants; heparin; platelet-rich plasma; platelets
Year: 2020 PMID: 32106422 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines8030042
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomedicines ISSN: 2227-9059