Literature DB >> 32105303

Association of T and N Categories of the American Joint Commission on Cancer, 8th Edition, With Metastasis and Survival in Patients With Orbital Sarcoma.

Ho-Seok Sa1,2, Maria Laura Rubin3, Jing Ning3, Wen Li3, Michael T Tetzlaff4, Susan L McGovern5, Arnold C Paulino5, Cynthia E Herzog6, Jonathan B Gill6, Bita Esmaeli1.   

Abstract

Importance: No previous studies to date have validated the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition of the TNM classification for orbital sarcoma.
Objectives: To determine the prognostic performance of the most recent TNM classification for orbital sarcoma and to identify other prognostic factors for local recurrence, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and death due to disease. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 73 consecutive patients treated for orbital sarcoma from March 1, 2003, through June 30, 2018. Data were analyzed from November 1 to December 31, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: T and N categories at presentation and disease-related outcomes, including local recurrence, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis (DM), and death due to disease (DD).
Results: The 73 participants included 43 men (59%), and the median age was 21 (range, 0-77) years. The common histologic types were rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) (35 [48%]), solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma (10 [14%]), and Ewing sarcoma (8 [11%]). The most common TNM designations were T2 N0 M0 (26 [36%]) and T4 N0 M0 (24 [33%]). T category was associated with the risk of all disease-related outcomes, including local recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] for T2 vs T4, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.06-0.81]; HR for T3 vs T4, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.13-2.65]; P = .03), lymph node metastasis by the last follow-up (T1, 1 [14%]; T2, 0; T3, 0; T4, 12 [35%]; P = .001), DM (HR for T2 vs T4, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.08-1.07]; P = .04), and DD (HR of T2 vs T4, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.04-0.73]; HR of T3 vs T4, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.04-2.34]; P = .02). Higher risk of DM and higher risk of DD were associated with disease category of at least T3 (HR for DM, 3.24 [95% CI, 0.89-11.72; P = .06]; HR for DD, 6.32 [95% CI, 1.43-27.95; P = .005]), N1 disease (HR for DM, 13.33 [95% CI, 4.07-43.65; P < .001]; HR for DD, 7.07 [95% CI, 2.45-20.44; P < .001]), tumor size larger than 3 cm (HR for DM, 2.72 [95% CI, 0.92-8.05; P = .06]; HR for DD, 5.79 [95% CI, 1.85-18.14; P < .001]), and age of patient with RMS younger than 1 year or 10 years or older (HR for DM, 6.85 [95% CI, 0.83-56.53; P = .04]; HR for DD, 7.03 [95% CI, 0.85-57.83; P = .04]). Higher risk of local recurrence was associated with disease category of at least T3 (HR for<T3 vs≥T3, 0.20 [95% CI, 0.06-0.71]; P < .01) and tumor size greater than 3 cm (HR for ≤3 cm vs >3 cm, 0.27 [95% CI, 0.09-0.77]; P = .009). Higher risk of lymph node metastasis was associated with disease category of at least T3 (odds ratio [OR], 13.33 [95% CI, 1.77-602.30]; P = .004), alveolar RMS (OR, 9.98 [95% CI, 2.13-51.55]; P = .001), and age of patient with RMS younger than 1 year or 10 years or older (OR, 9.20 [95% CI, 1.01-458.29] P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with orbital sarcoma, T and N categories at presentation (defined by the AJCC 8th edition classification) correlate with metastasis and survival. These findings appear to support consideration of strict surveillance testing for regional nodal and systemic metastases in patients with orbital sarcoma with disease category of at least T3 and/or N1 disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32105303      PMCID: PMC7047857          DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.0039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2168-6165            Impact factor:   7.389


  22 in total

Review 1.  Orbital lymphatics: do they exist?

Authors:  A J Dickinson; R E Gausas
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Efficacy of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies for adult orbital sarcomas.

Authors:  Aaron Savar; Jonathan Trent; Nagham Al-Zubidi; Winston Huh; Pete Anderson; Roman Shinder; Bita Esmaeli
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.746

3.  Prognostic factors and assessment of staging systems for head and neck soft tissue sarcomas in adults.

Authors:  J P Van Damme; S Schmitz; J P Machiels; C Galant; V Grégoire; B Lengelé; M Hamoir
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 4.424

4.  Comparative Performance of the 7th and 8th Editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Systems for Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Trunk and Extremities.

Authors:  Sarah B Fisher; Yi-Ju Chiang; Barry W Feig; Janice N Cormier; Kelly K Hunt; Keila E Torres; Christina L Roland
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Soft tissue sarcoma in children: prognosis and management.

Authors:  Ewa Koscielniak; Mary Morgan; Jörn Treuner
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.022

6.  Age is an independent prognostic factor in rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  D Joshi; James R Anderson; C Paidas; J Breneman; D M Parham; W Crist
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.167

7.  Survey of 1264 patients with orbital tumors and simulating lesions: The 2002 Montgomery Lecture, part 1.

Authors:  Jerry A Shields; Carol L Shields; Richard Scartozzi
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Lymph node metastasis from soft tissue sarcoma in adults. Analysis of data from a prospective database of 1772 sarcoma patients.

Authors:  Y Fong; D G Coit; J M Woodruff; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  The anatomical location and laterality of orbital cavernous haemangiomas.

Authors:  Alan A McNab; Dinesh Selva; Thomas G Hardy; Brett O'Donnell
Journal:  Orbit       Date:  2014-05-15

10.  Epidemiology and survivorship of soft tissue sarcomas in adults: a national cancer database report.

Authors:  Robert M Corey; Katrina Swett; William G Ward
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 4.452

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model for Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Ewing's Sarcoma.

Authors:  Wenle Li; Qian Zhou; Wencai Liu; Chan Xu; Zhi-Ri Tang; Shengtao Dong; Haosheng Wang; Wanying Li; Kai Zhang; Rong Li; Wenshi Zhang; Zhaohui Hu; Su Shibin; Qiang Liu; Sirui Kuang; Chengliang Yin
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.