Literature DB >> 32105297

Association Between Eliminating Water From Surgical Hand Antisepsis at a Large Ophthalmic Surgical Hospital and Cost.

Matthew J Javitt1, Adriana Grossman2, Alana Grajewski1, Jonathan C Javitt3.   

Abstract

Importance: Alcohol-based surgical scrub is recommended for presurgical antisepsis by leading health organizations. Despite this recommendation, water-based scrub techniques remain common practice at many institutions. Objective: To calculate the potential financial savings that a large, subspecialty ophthalmic surgical center can achieve with a conversion to waterless surgical hand preparation. Design, Setting, and Participants: A review of accounting records associated with the purchase of scrubbing materials and water company invoices was conducted to assess direct costs attributable to water consumption and scrub materials for brushless, alcohol-based surgical scrub and water-based presurgical scrub. The flow rate of scrub sinks to estimate water consumption per year was tested. Savings associated with operating room (OR) and personnel time were calculated based on the prescribed scrub times for waterless techniques vs traditional running-water techniques. The study was conducted from January 5 to March 1, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes for this study were the quantity of water consumed by aqueous scrubbing procedures as well as the cost differences between alcohol-based surgical scrub and water-based scrub procedures per OR per year.
Results: Scrub sinks consumed 15.9 L of water in a 2-minute period, projecting a savings of 61 631 L and $277 in water and sewer cost per operating room per year. Alcohol-based surgical scrub cost $1083 less than aqueous soap applied from wall-mounted soap dispensers and $271 less than preimpregnated scrub brushes per OR per year in supply costs. The decrease in scrub time from adopting waterless scrub technique could save between approximately $280 000 and $348 000 per OR per year. Conclusions and Relevance: Adopting waterless scrub techniques has the potential for economic savings attributable to water. Savings may be larger for surgical facilities performing more personnel-intensive procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32105297      PMCID: PMC7047872          DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.0048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2168-6165            Impact factor:   7.389


  17 in total

1.  Usefulness of an alcohol solution of N-duopropenide for the surgical antisepsis of the hands compared with handwashing with iodine-povidone and chlorhexidine: clinical essay.

Authors:  R Herruzo-Cabrera; M J Vizcaino-Alcaide; M J Fdez-Aciñero
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  Cluster-randomized, crossover trial of the efficacy of plain soap and water versus alcohol-based rub for surgical hand preparation in a rural hospital in Kenya.

Authors:  P M Nthumba; E Stepita-Poenaru; D Poenaru; P Bird; B Allegranzi; D Pittet; S Harbarth
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Comparison of two alcohol-based surgical scrub solutions with an iodine-based scrub brush for presurgical antiseptic effectiveness in a community hospital.

Authors:  C Gupta; A M Czubatyj; L E Briski; A K Malani
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  The green operating room: simple changes to reduce cost and our carbon footprint.

Authors:  Blair A Wormer; Vedra A Augenstein; Christin L Carpenter; Patrick V Burton; William T Yokeley; Ajita S Prabhu; Beth Harris; Sujatha Norton; David A Klima; Amy E Lincourt; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 5.  Hand antiseptics: rubs versus scrubs, alcoholic solutions versus alcoholic gels.

Authors:  H Pietsch
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  New method for assessing hand disinfection shows that pre-operative alcohol/chlorhexidine rub is as effective as a traditional surgical scrub.

Authors:  J D Howard; C Jowett; J Faoagali; B McKenzie
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  The Effects of Surgical Hand Scrubbing Protocols on Skin Integrity and Surgical Site Infection Rates: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Liang Qin Liu; Sinead Mehigan
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 0.676

8.  [Surgical team satisfaction levels between two preoperative hand-washing methods].

Authors:  Omar Vergara-Fernández; José Martín Morales-Olivera; Sergio Ponce-de-León-Rosales; Roger Vega-Batista; Rabí Mejía-Ovalle; Martha Huertas-Jiménez; Alfredo Ponce-de-León; Margarita Navarrete; Samuel Ponce-de-León; Alejandro Macías; Takeshi Takahashi-Monroy
Journal:  Rev Invest Clin       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.451

9.  Impact of face-washing on trachoma in Kongwa, Tanzania.

Authors:  S West; B Muñoz; M Lynch; A Kayongoya; Z Chilangwa; B B Mmbaga; H R Taylor
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-01-21       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Alcohol-based surgical hand preparation: translating scientific evidence into clinical practice.

Authors:  Gilberto G Gaspar; Mayra G Menegueti; Ana Elisa R Lopes; Roberto O C Santos; Thamiris R de Araújo; Aline Nassiff; Lécio R Ferreira; Maria Eulalia L V Dallora; Silvia R M S Canini; Fernando Bellissimo-Rodrigues
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 4.887

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.