Literature DB >> 32104968

Use of a trizonal schema to assess targeting accuracy in prostatic fusion biopsy.

Anthony Franklin1, Tony Gianduzzo2, John Yaxley3, Boon Kua4, Geoff Coughlin4, Hema Samaratunga5, Troy Gianduzzo6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the use of a novel 'trizonal' biopsy schema in which 'near-target' biopsies are taken adjacent to the MRI lesion, in addition to target and systematic biopsies, to determine the accuracy of prostate MRI fusion systems. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A trizonal biopsy technique was used to evaluate 75 men with small Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3-5 MRI lesions (<15 mm) identified from a prospective cohort of 290 men undergoing multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for suspected prostate cancer at a single high-volume institution between September 2017 and May 2019. In addition to target and systematic biopsies, near-target biopsies were taken 4 mm from the apparent border of the MRI lesion. Comparisons were made between highest International Society of Urological Pathology grade and longest tumour length.
RESULTS: Fifty-three men with significant prostate cancer in the same quadrant as the target were included in the final analysis. The percentages of positive cores from target, near-target and MRI-negative zones were 66%, 39% and 17%, respectively. Significant cancer was detected in the near-target zone in 77% of cases when the target zone was positive. A total of 17% of participants were upgraded by a median (range) of 1 (1-3) grades through the addition of near-target cores. Notably, 9% of men were diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer solely via the near-target biopsy cores when the target cores were negative.
CONCLUSION: The use of near-target biopsies as part of a trizonal biopsy schema provides a novel methodology to optimize clinically significant prostate cancer detection.
© 2020 The Authors BJU International © 2020 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accuracy; fusion biopsy; mpMRI; prostate cancer; trizonal biopsy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32104968     DOI: 10.1111/bju.14974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  4 in total

Review 1.  Transrectal Ultrasound in Prostate Cancer: Current Utilization, Integration with mpMRI, HIFU and Other Emerging Applications.

Authors:  John Panzone; Timothy Byler; Gennady Bratslavsky; Hanan Goldberg
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 3.989

2.  Focal therapy for prostate cancer with irreversible electroporation: Oncological and functional results of a single institution study.

Authors:  William John Yaxley; Troy Gianduzzo; Boon Kua; Rachel Oxford; John William Yaxley
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2022-05

Review 3.  Diagnostic Performance of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging-directed Targeted plus Regional Biopsy Approach in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marinus J Hagens; Mar Fernandez Salamanca; Anwar R Padhani; Pim J van Leeuwen; Henk G van der Poel; Ivo G Schoots
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-05-02

4.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Docetaxel Adsorption on Graphene Quantum Dots Surface Modified by PEG-b-PLA Copolymers.

Authors:  Mehdi Yoosefian; Mitra Fouladi; Leonard Ionut Atanase
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 5.076

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.