| Literature DB >> 32104385 |
Bingchao Cheng1, Dongyang Li1, Qiye Huo1, Qianqian Zhao1, Qi Lan1, Mengsuo Cui1, Weisan Pan1, Xinggang Yang1,2.
Abstract
To obtain expected rapid-release and sustained-release of ketoprofen gel beads, this paper adopted biopolymer alginate to prepare alginate beads and chitosan-alginate gel beads. Formulation factors were investigated and optimized by the single factor test. The release of ketoprofen from calcium alginate gel beads in pH 1.0 hydrochloric acid solution was less than 10% during 2 h, then in pH6.8 was about 95% during 45 min, which met the requirements of rapid-release preparations. However, the drug release of chitosan-alginate gel beads in pH1.0 was less than 5% during 2 h, then in pH6.8 was about 50% during 6 h and reached more than 95% during 12 h, which had a good sustained-release behavior. In addition, the release kinetics of keteprofen from the calcium alginate gel beads fitted well with the Korsmeyer-Peppas model and followed a case-II transport mechanism. However, the release of keteprofen from the chitosan-alginate gel beads exhibited a non-Fickian mechanism and based on the mixed mechanisms of diffusion and polymer relaxation from chitosan-alginate beads. In a word, alginate gel beads of ketoprofen were instant analgesic, while chitosan-alginate gel beads could control the release of ketoprofen during gastro-intestinal tract and prolong the drug's action time.Entities:
Keywords: Enteric rapid-release; Enteric sustained-release; Gel beads; Ketoprofen
Year: 2017 PMID: 32104385 PMCID: PMC7032093 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajps.2017.10.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian J Pharm Sci ISSN: 1818-0876 Impact factor: 6.598
Influence on entrapment efficiency and drug loading of different molecular weights of SA.
| Molecular weight | Entrapment efficiency (%) | Drug loading (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Low | 68.50 ± 0.31 | 16.85 ± 0.05 |
| Medium | 83.27 ± 0.78 | 26.61 ± 0.09 |
| High | 91.06 ± 1.05 | 31.92 ± 0.13 |
Influence on entrapment efficiency and drug loading of different concentrations of SA.
| Concentration (g/100 mL) | Entrapment efficiency (%) | Drug loading (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | 82.55 ± 0.67 | 26.32 ± 0.59 |
| 1.5 | 92.67 ± 0.99 | 32.78 ± 0.73 |
| 2.0 | 94.16 ± 1.04 | 33.15 ± 0.60 |
Influence on entrapment efficiency and drug loading of different ratio of the SA:drug.
| SA:drug | Entrapment efficiency (%) | Drug loading (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1:1 | 78.36 ± 0.97 | 44.12 ± 0.54 |
| 2:1 | 90.88 ± 0.91 | 30.52 ± 0.61 |
| 3:1 | 93.67 ± 1.38 | 23.17 ± 0.52 |
Influence on entrapment efficiency and drug loading of different concentrations of CaCl2.
| Concentration (g/100 mL) | Entrapment efficiency (%) | Drug loading (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | 90.12 ± 0.33 | 29.36 ± 0.37 |
| 1.5 | 91.34 ± 0.41 | 30.23 ± 0.87 |
| 2.0 | 90.78 ± 0.34 | 30.51 ± 0.81 |
Influence on entrapment efficiency and drug loading of different concentrations of CS.
| Concentration (g/100 mL) | Entrapment efficiency (%) | Drug loading (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | 89.76 ± 0.86 | 32.12 ± 0.29 |
| 1.2 | 91.23 ± 0.63 | 32.94 ± 0.31 |
| 1.4 | 89.15 ± 0.92 | 30.66 ± 0.47 |
Fig. 1Influence on release from CS-SA beads in the artificial gastric and intestinal juice: (A) molecular weights of SA, (B) concentrations of SA, (C) the ratio of the SA:drug, (D) the concentrations of CaCl2 and (E) the concentrations of CS.
The factors and levels of orthogonal design.
| Factors/Levels | A | B | C | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SA(%) | SA:drug | CS (%) | CaCl2 (%) | |
| 1 | 1 | 1:1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 1.5 | 2:1 | 1.2 | 1.5 |
| 3 | 2 | 3:1 | 1.4 | 2 |
The results of orthogonal design.
| No | Factors | P2h (%) | P6h (%) | L (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | ||||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 18.32 | 78.55 | 46.87 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 15.29 | 73.55 | 38.84 |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 17.31 | 75.13 | 42.44 |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8.13 | 61.32 | 19.45 |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 15.26 | 73.17 | 38.43 |
| 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8.02 | 54.23 | 12.25 |
| 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 16.94 | 78.15 | 45.09 |
| 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7.31 | 69.68 | 26.99 |
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4.32 | 62.72 | 17.04 |
| K1 | 42.72 | 37.14 | 28.7 | 34.11 | |||
| K2 | 23.38 | 34.75 | 25.11 | 32.06 | |||
| K3 | 29.71 | 23.91 | 41.99 | 29.63 | |||
| R | 19.34 | 13.23 | 16.88 | 4.49 | |||
The results of variance analysis.
| Factors | Sum of squared residuals | ff | Variance | F-value | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 583.37 | 2 | 291.69 | 19.27 | <0.05 |
| B | 298.2 | 2 | 149.1 | 9.85 | >0.05 |
| C | 474.18 | 2 | 237.09 | 15.67 | >0.05 |
| D | 30.27 | 2 | 15.14 | 1 |
F1-0.05(2, 2) = 19.00.
Fig. 2Scanning electron micrographs of (A) the SA gel beads and (B) the CS-SA gel beads, the scale bar was 0.25 mm and 50 μm, respectively.
The properties of CA and CS-SA gel beads.
| Batch | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mean | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAD50(mm) | 1.068 | 1.088 | 1.072 | 1.076 | 0.98 |
| CS-SAD50(mm) | 0.781 | 0.767 | 0.752 | 0.767 | 1.89 |
Fig. 3The swelling ration of (A) CA gel beads and (B) CS-SA gel beads in different mediums.
Fig. 4The release profile of Ketoprofen from (A) CA gel beads and (B) CS-SA gel beads in different media.
Fig. 5The release profile of CA and CS-SA gel beads in the artificial gastric and intestinal juice.
Regression equation of different models for CA gel beads.
| Model | Equation | |
|---|---|---|
| Zero-order | Qt = 1.735t+12.703 | 0.9060 |
| First-order | Ln(100-Qt)=-0.311t+0.4828 | 0.9632 |
| Higuchi | Qt = 14.502t1/2-6.199 | 0.9543 |
| Ritger–Peppas | LnQt = 1.061t+2.556 | 0.9818 |
Regression equation of different models for CS-SA gel beads.
| Model | Equation | |
|---|---|---|
| Zero-order | Qt = 8.829t+0.0441 | 0.9827 |
| First-order | Ln(100-Qt)=-0.035t+0.375 | 0.9684 |
| Higuchi | Qt = 2.9021t1/2-1.415 | 0.9902 |
| Ritger–Peppas | LnQt = 0.756t+2.557 | 0.9832 |