| Literature DB >> 32104291 |
Qing Yang1, Ting Wang2, Lei Ai3, Kai Jiang1, Xingguang Tao1, Dongliang Gong1, Nong Chen1, Yang Fu1, Fugen Pan1.
Abstract
As part of the treatment of pelvic fracture, major hemorrhage poses a challenge for trauma surgeons. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of blood transfusion in the initial 6 h after pelvic fracture, and to define the blood transfusion volume required for each pelvic fracture type. A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients with pelvic fracture at a single Level I Trauma Centre over a 3-year period. A total of 1,297 patients were transported to our trauma centre within 2 h of injury and blood transfusion was administered in the initial 6 h after pelvic fracture. Review of the patients' medical records provided the initial pelvic radiographs and data from emergency department care. Clinical outcomes, including frequency of blood transfusion, blood transfusion volume, injury severity scores and mortality, were evaluated. All pelvic fractures were defined as closed fractures and patients were categorized according to the Arbeit fuer Osteosynthese (AO) classification system. Statistical methods were used to identify trends to provide guidance for clinical prediction. Complete data were available for 497 patients with pelvic fracture, 104 (20.9%) of which received blood transfusion. The blood transfusion volume in the initial 6 h ranged from 0 to 10,000 ml, with a mean of 1,213.94±1354.11 ml. The total mortality rate was 1.8%. Among the patients with C-type pelvic fractures, the frequency of blood transfusion was 59.0% and the mean volume was 2,191.30±1,740.93 ml. The mortality rate for C-type pelvic fractures was 11.43%. The B3 subtype of pelvic fractures had the highest transfusion frequency (53.6%), while the C3 subtype had the largest blood transfusion volume (5,700.00±4,666.90 ml). Patients with type A-C pelvic fractures had a progressively larger mean transfusion volume, transfusion frequency and mortality in the initial 6 h after pelvic fracture. The AO classification system was demonstrated to be a useful tool for the identification of pelvic fracture risk in the present study. Copyright: © Yang et al.Entities:
Keywords: hemorrhage; pelvic fracture; prediction rule; transfusion
Year: 2020 PMID: 32104291 PMCID: PMC7027319 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2020.8445
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
General characteristics of the patients (n=497).
| Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 32±16.5 |
| Gender | |
| Male | 276 (55.5) |
| Female | 221 (44.5) |
| Mean ISS | 16±9.08 |
| Cause of injury | |
| Motor vehicle collision | 306 (61.6) |
| Fall from height | 129 (26.0) |
| Crush injury | 35 (7.0) |
| Fall on the ground | 22 (4.4) |
| Other | 5 (1.0) |
| AO classification | |
| A | 395 (79.5) |
| A1 | 16 (3.2) |
| A2 | 216 (43.5) |
| A3 | 163 (32.8) |
| B | 63 (12.7) |
| B1 | 18 (3.6) |
| B2 | 39 (7.9) |
| B3 | 6 (1.2) |
| C | 39 (7.9) |
| C1 | 26 (5.2) |
| C2 | 10 (2.0) |
| C3 | 3 (0.6) |
| FAST | + |
| B | 23 (36.5) |
| C | 20 (51.3) |
| Systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg | 31 (6.2) |
| Heart frequency >130 beats per minute | 44 (8.9) |
| Number of blood transfusion | 104 (20.9) |
| Mean volume of blood transfusion (ml) | 1213.94±1354.11 |
Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation or n (%). AO, Arbeit fuer Osteosynthese; ISS, injury severity score; FAST, Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma.
Blood transfusion and transfusion volume compared among different AO types.
| AO type | Patients (n) | Transfusion | Volume (ml) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 395 | 49 (12.4) | 437.76±282.02 |
| B | 63 | 32 (50.1) | 1,603.13±1,203.28 |
| C | 39 | 323 (59.0) | 2,191.30±1,740.93[ |
| Total | 497 | 104 (20.9) |
P<0.01, χ2=46.6789 and F=2 vs. type A and B. Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation or n (%). AO, Arbeit fuer Osteosynthese.
Figure 1.Transfusion requirement by AO type. The AO type of pelvic fractures is displayed on the X-axis, whilst the Y-axis indicates the volume of blood transfusion in ml. Each column represents the amount of blood transfusion required with each different AO type of pelvic fractures. It shows a larger mean blood transfusion volume in C type pelvic fractures, as compared to the other types (χ2=46.6789, F=2, P<0.01). AO, Arbeit fuer Osteosynthese.
Distribution of blood transfusion (n).
| Volume of blood transfusion (ml) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AO type | <600 | 600–1,500 | >1,500[ | Total |
| A | 42 (79.3) | 7 (30.4) | 0 (0) | 49 |
| B | 7 (15.1) | 10 (39.1) | 15 (53.6) | 32 |
| C | 2 (5.7) | 6 (30.4) | 15 (46.4) | 23[ |
| Total | 51 | 23 | 30 | 104 |
P<0.01, F=4, χ2=56.9067 vs. fracture A and B
P<0.0001, F=2, χ2=39.7562 vs. fracture A and B. Values are expressed as n (%). AO, Arbeit fuer Osteosynthese.
Figure 2.Transfusion requirement by AO subtype of pelvic fractures. The AO subtype of pelvic fractures is displayed on the X-axis, while the Y-axis indicates the volume of blood transfusion. Each column represents the amount of blood transfusion required with each different AO type of pelvic fractures. It was indicated that the B3 subtype had the highest transfusion frequency, while the C3 subtype had the largest volume of blood transfusion. AO, Arbeit fuer Osteosynthese.
Blood transfusion and transfusion volume compared among AO subtypes.
| AO subtype | Patients (n) | Blood transfusion | Volume (ml) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | 16 | 0 (0) | 0 |
| A2 | 216 | 39 (18.1) | 407.69±255.09 |
| A3 | 163 | 10 (6.1) | 540.00±368.78 |
| B1 | 18 | 7 (38.9) | 2357.14±1183.37 |
| B2 | 39 | 20 (51.3) | 1372.50±1206.18 |
| B3 | 6 | 5 (83.3) | 1470.00±962.81 |
| C1 | 26 | 16 (61.5) | 1743.75±1000.81 |
| C2 | 10 | 5 (50.0) | 2220.00±714.67 |
| C3 | 3 | 2 (66.7) | 5700.00±4666.90 |
| Total | 497 | 104 (20.9) |
Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation or n (%). AO, Arbeit fuer Osteosynthese.
ISS of different AO types.
| AO type | Patients (n) | ISS |
|---|---|---|
| A | 395 | 8.93±6.38 |
| B | 63 | 17.95±9.21 |
| C | 39 | 19.46±6.12[ |
P<0.01, χ2=106.8412, F=2 vs. fracture A and B. Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. AO, Arbeit fuer Osteosynthese; ISS, injury severity score.
Hospital stay and ICU days.
| AO type | Total patients | Patients in hospital [n, (%)] | Hospital stay (days) | Patients in ICU [n, (%)] | ICU stay (days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 395 | 69 (17.5) | 10±2.0 | 0 | 0 |
| B | 63 | 42 (66.7) | 14±4.1 | 24 (38.1) | 7±5.2 |
| C | 39 | 39 (100) | 24±3.8[ | 35 (89.7) | 16±4.7[ |
| Total | 497 | 150 (30.2) | 18±6.5 | 59 (11.9) | 9±7.3 |
P<0.01 vs. fracture A and B. Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation or n (%). AO, Arbeit Fuer Osteosynthese; ICU, intensive care unit.
Mortality and morbidity.
| AO type | Mortality | Morbidity | Volume of blood transfusion (ml) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1 (0.3) | 395 (30.5[ | 1,200 |
| B | 4 (6.3) | 63 (4.8) | 1,686 |
| C | 4[ | 39 (3.0) | 2,100 |
P<0.01, F=2, χ2=28.3328, vs. fracture B and C.
P<0.0001 vs. fracture A and B. Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation or n (%). AO, Arbeit fuer Osteosynthese.