Literature DB >> 32103993

Prognostic Values of LDH and CRP in Cervical Cancer.

Han Wang1, Meng-Sen Wang2, Yong-Heng Zhou1, Jian-Ping Shi3, Wen-Jie Wang3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cervical cancer is one of the deadliest tumors among women in China. C-reactive protein (CRP), an indicator of inflammation, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), an enzyme ubiquitously expressed in cells, both play important roles in tumor growth and metastasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Based on pre-radiotherapy LDH and CRP median levels, we divided patients into four groups: high LDH and CRP group, high LDH group, high CRP group, and low LDH and CRP group. Then, based on pre-/post-radiotherapy LDH and CRP ratios, we divided patients into four groups: high LDH and CRP ratio group, high LDH ratio group, high CRP ratio group, and low LDH and CRP ratio group. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were constructed to show overall survival (OS). A multivariate Cox regression model was employed to identify the independent risk factors.
RESULTS: High pre-radiotherapy LDH and CRP levels and increased pre-/post-radiotherapy LDH and CRP ratios were correlated with worst OS compared with the other three groups.
CONCLUSION: LDH and CRP were correlated with outcomes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
© 2020 Wang et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRP; LDH; OS; cervical cancer; prognosis

Year:  2020        PMID: 32103993      PMCID: PMC7023883          DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S235027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Onco Targets Ther        ISSN: 1178-6930            Impact factor:   4.147


Introduction

With 98,900 new cases and 30,500 deaths each year, cervical cancer is one of the most common and lethal tumors affecting women in China.1 Numerous high-risk factors, such as HPV infection, malnutrition, smoking, and multiple sexual partners, are tightly correlated with the initiation and progression of cervical cancer.2,3 Pathologically, cervical cancer can be divided into squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and small cell carcinoma, with squamous cell carcinoma accounting for 80% of the total. Surgery is widely accepted as the first-line therapy for early-stage cervical cancer, while patients with local advanced cervical cancer are usually given concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).4,5 C-reactive protein (CRP) was discovered in 1930 and well-characterized as an indicator of systemic inflammation.6,7 Inflammation plays an important role in the development of cervical cancer, and can also affect cervical tissue remodeling, as well as the release of cytokines and chemokines, among other processes.8 CRP is associated with the prognosis of a variety of cancers, including cervical squamous cell carcinoma.9–13 LDH is a ubiquitous cellular enzyme, and comprises the rate-limiting step in the conversion of pyruvate to lactic acid under anaerobic conditions.14 The level of serum LDH is associated with the prognosis of several cancers, including nasopharyngeal, colon, and lung cancers.15,16 We previously found that in early operable cervical cancer, high levels of CRP and LDH were correlated with poor prognosis.13 In our present study, elevated serum CRP and LDH levels were correlated with worse prognosis in locally advanced cervical cancer patients. Our aim is to predict patient outcomes through a combined evaluation of CRP with LDH levels.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

This retrospective study included a total of 150 patients with locally advanced squamous cell cervical cancer who were admitted to the Jining Cancer Hospital from 2013 to 2015 and the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University in 2015. All patients were staged according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) criteria,17 and the main predictor of the study was overall survival (OS). The median age of patients was 59 years (range 24 to 75). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Jining Cancer Hospital and the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, and all patients signed informed consent. Our study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The inclusion criteria were as follows: a) Patients presenting with cervical cancer according to FIGO stage 1B2, IIA2, IIB, IIIA, and IIIB; b) eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) score of 0–1; c) squamous cell carcinoma confirmed by histopathology; d) 18–75 years of age. The exclusion criteria were as follows: a) Non-squamous cell carcinoma of cervical histopathology; b) patient failed to complete CCRT; c) patients with abnormally elevated CRP levels combined with fever or neutrophil abnormalities.

Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy

Radiotherapy: All patients were administered external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D–CRT), or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). A total dose of 45.0–50.4Gy in 25–28 fractions was prescribed. In intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT), accumulative dose of 30–36Gy in 5–7 fractions was prescribed to point A. Concurrent chemotherapy: The first-line regimen of concurrent chemotherapy was cisplatin(30–40mg/m2/week). Paclitaxel (60–80mg/m2/week) was prescribed for patients with renal insufficiency or those who could not tolerate cisplatin.

Evaluation of Patients

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was performed every 3–6 months to assess the response and patients were assessed according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1.18

Blood Samples

Peripheral venous blood was collected into a sterile EDTA tube; patients fasted for 8 hours and elbow venous blood was obtained between 07:00 and 07:30 to standardize the known impact of circulating hormones (circadian rhythm) on the CRP and LDH levels. Blood samples were examined using a hematology analyzer (Sysmex XE-2100; Sysmex, Kobe, Japan).

Follow-Up

Survival time was measured from the date of diagnosis until death or last clinical evaluation. The prognostic analyses were performed for OS. Patients were followed up for 8–77 months (median 39 months). The first follow-up was one month after radiotherapy, and continued until the patient died or end of the study in August 2019.

Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 19.0 (SPSS, IBM; Chicago, IL, USA) and GraphPad Prism version 8.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). For analysis of survival data, Kaplan–Meier curves were constructed, and statistical analysis was carried out using the Log-rank test. The association between LDH and CRP was analyzed by Spearman’s rank correlation. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was employed to identify the independent risk factors associated with cervical cancer. The chi-square test was used to compare the categorical variables. All P-values<0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Clinical Features

Our study included 150 patients. The median age of the patients was 56 years and the median survival time was 38 months. Of the 150 patients enrolled, 70 presented with lymph node metastasis. At the time of diagnosis, 29 patients were stage IB2, 50 were stage IIA2–IIB, and 71 were stage III. All patients underwent first-line CCRT. The clinicopathological features are detailed in Table 1.
Table 1

Clinicopathological Features

Clinicopathological FeaturesnCRPLDH
Low (n)High (n)P-valueLow (n)High (n)P-value
150
Lymphonodus metastasis
 No8036440.13839410.394
 Yes7040303931
Age (years)
 ≤ 597741360.51645320.105
 > 597335383340
FIGO stage
 IB2, IIA2, IIB7944350.19440390.724
 IIIA, IIIB7132393833
Grade
 1–210253490.64452500.716
 34823252622

Abbreviations: CRP, C-reactive protein; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase.

Clinicopathological Features Abbreviations: CRP, C-reactive protein; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase.

The Relationship Between LDH and CRP Levels and Cervical Cancer Patient Survival Before Radiotherapy

The patients were divided into two groups according to the median levels of LDH or CRP. The high-LDH-level group had worse OS than the low-level group (P =0.013, Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.789; 95% CI = 1.118–2.864) (Figure 1A). The high-CRP-level group had worse OS than the low-level group (P =0.003, HR 2.028; 95% CI =1.265–3.251) (Figure 1B).
Figure 1

The relationships between pre-radiotherapy levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and C-reactive protein (CRP) with prognosis. (A) LDH levels with OS. (B) CRP levels with OS.

The relationships between pre-radiotherapy levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and C-reactive protein (CRP) with prognosis. (A) LDH levels with OS. (B) CRP levels with OS.

The Relationship Between the Pre-/Post-Radiotherapy Ratio of LDH or CRP with Cervical Cancer Patient Survival

The patients were divided into two groups according to pre-radiotherapy and post-radiotherapy LDH or CRP ratios. The group with a higher LDH ratio had worse OS than the group with a lower ratio(P <0.001, HR 2.838; 95% CI = 1.749–4.606) (Figure 2A). The group with a higher CRP ratio had worse OS than the group with a lower ratio (P <0.001, HR 2.510; 95% CI =1.557–4.046) (Figure 2B).
Figure 2

The relationships between pre-/post-radiotherapy lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)and C-reactive protein (CRP)ratios and prognosis. (A) LDH ratios with overall survival (OS). (B) CRP ratios with OS.

The relationships between pre-/post-radiotherapy lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)and C-reactive protein (CRP)ratios and prognosis. (A) LDH ratios with overall survival (OS). (B) CRP ratios with OS.

The Relationship Between High Levels of Both LDH and CRP or High Pre-/Post-Radiotherapy Ratios of Both LDH and CRP with Survival of Cervical Cancer Patients

In pre-radiotherapy, the patients were divided into the following four groups based on LDH and CRP levels in median: high LDH and CRP group, high LDH group, high CRP group, and low LDH and CRP group. The high LDH and CRP group had the worst OS among the four groups (P =0.002) (Figure 3A).
Figure 3

The relationships between different groups and prognosis. (A) The overall survival (OS) according to different pre-radiotherapy groups. (B) The OS according to different pre/post-radiotherapy groups.

The relationships between different groups and prognosis. (A) The overall survival (OS) according to different pre-radiotherapy groups. (B) The OS according to different pre/post-radiotherapy groups. For the pre-/post-radiotherapy ratio, the patients were divided into the following four groups, based on the LDH or CRP ratios: high LDH and CRP ratio group, high LDH ratio group, high CRP ratio group, and low LDH and CRP ratio group. The high LDH and CRP ratio group had the worst OS of the four groups (P <0.001) (Figure 3B).

Cox Regression Analysis of Pre-Radiotherapy Parameters

In univariate analysis, high FIGO stage (HR 1.889; 95% CI = 1.345–2.653; P<0.001) and high LDH and CRP levels (HR 1.723; 95% CI = 1.265–2.348; P<0.001) were significant risk factors for worse prognosis (Figure 4A). In multivariate analysis, high FIGO stage (HR 1.817; 95% CI = 1.288–2.565; P<0.001) and the high LDH and CRP levels (HR 1.632; 95% CI = 1.186–2.244; P=0.003) were found to be independently associated with worse survival (Figure 4B).
Figure 4

Cox regression analysis of pre-radiotherapy lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels with prognosis. (A) Univariate analysis. (B) Multivariate analysis.

Cox regression analysis of pre-radiotherapy lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels with prognosis. (A) Univariate analysis. (B) Multivariate analysis.

Cox Regression Analysis of Pre-/Post-Radiotherapy Ratio Parameters

The univariate analysis indicated that a high FIGO stage (HR 1.889; 95% CI = 1.345–2.653; P<0.001) and high ratios of both LDH and CR. (HR 2.339; 95% CI = 1.704–3.221; P<0.001) were significant risk factors for worse prognosis (Figure 5A). In multivariate analysis (Figure 5B), a high FIGO stage (HR 1.843; 95% CI = 1.298–2.616; P<0.001) and high ratios of both LDH and CRP (HR 2.373; 95% CI = 1.700–3.314; P<0.001) were found to be independently associated with worse survival.
Figure 5

Cox regression analysis of pre-/post-radiotherapy lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and C-reactive protein (CRP) ratios with prognosis. (A) Univariate analysis. (B) Multivariate analysis.

Cox regression analysis of pre-/post-radiotherapy lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and C-reactive protein (CRP) ratios with prognosis. (A) Univariate analysis. (B) Multivariate analysis.

The Correlation of LDH with CRP

The pre-radiotherapy LDH level had a positive correlation with the pre-radiotherapy CRP level (P <0.001, r=0.282) (Figure 6A). The post-radiotherapy LDH level had a positive correlation with the post-radiotherapy CRP level (P <0.001, r=0.390) (Figure 6B).
Figure 6

The relationships between the levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and C-reactive protein (CRP). (A) Pre-radiotherapy levels of LDH and CRP. (B) Post-radiotherapy levels of LDH and CRP.

The relationships between the levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and C-reactive protein (CRP). (A) Pre-radiotherapy levels of LDH and CRP. (B) Post-radiotherapy levels of LDH and CRP.

The Correlation of LDH or CRP with Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen (SCC-Ag) Levels

The pre-radiotherapy LDH level had a positive correlation with the SCC-Ag level (P <0.001, r=0.617) (Figure 7A). The pre-radiotherapy CRP level also had positive correlation with the SCC-Ag level, as shown in Figure 7B (P <0.001, r=0.521). The post-radiotherapy LDH level had a positive correlation with the SCC-Ag level (P =0.020, r=0.422) (Figure 7C). The post-radiotherapy CRP level had a positive correlation with the SCC-Ag level (P =0.038, r=0.381) (Figure 7D).
Figure 7

The relationships between the levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)or C-reactive protein (CRP)and the level of squamous cell carcinoma antigen(SCC-Ag). (A) Pre-radiotherapy levels of LDH and SCC-Ag. (B) Pre-radiotherapy levels of CRP and SCC-Ag. (C) Post-radiotherapy levels of LDH and SCC-Ag. (D) Post-radiotherapy levels of CRP and SCC-Ag.

The relationships between the levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)or C-reactive protein (CRP)and the level of squamous cell carcinoma antigen(SCC-Ag). (A) Pre-radiotherapy levels of LDH and SCC-Ag. (B) Pre-radiotherapy levels of CRP and SCC-Ag. (C) Post-radiotherapy levels of LDH and SCC-Ag. (D) Post-radiotherapy levels of CRP and SCC-Ag.

Discussion

In this study, we found that patients with high levels of serum LDH and CRP before radiotherapy and patients with increased LDH and CRP ratios had a worse OS in cervical cancer. CRP is an acute-phase protein produced and secreted by hepatocytes.19 Polterauer et al demonstrated that patients with high pre-treatment CRP levels(CRP>0.5mg/dL) had worse prognosis than those with low CRP levels (CRP<0.5mg/dL) in cervical cancer.20 Cervical cancer-associated molecules induced by inflammation include tumor necrosis factor (TNF), chemokines, interleukins, and reactive oxygen species (ROS).8 Inflammatory factors such as IL-6, IL-1, and TNF can induce CRP production in the liver as part of the inflammatory response,19 and the potential mechanisms involved primarily include the following: First, in cervical cancer, TNF can induce the production of amphiregulin, which further leads to the proliferation of cervical cancer cells, while IL-6 and IL-1 have roles in the growth and metastasis of cervical cancer cells.8 Second, the occurrence of cervical cancer is closely related to HPV infection (especially HPV16 and HPV18).3 Infection by HPV18 leads to DNA damage, increased production of nitric oxide (NO), and activation of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)/prostaglandin (PG)/PG receptors in cervical tissue, which in turn results in local inflammation and tumor formation.8 Li et al showed that patients with a high level of LDH (LDH≥252μ/L) had worse recurrence-free survival.21 An increased serum LDH level leads to a cascade downstream of hypoxia-inducible factor1 (HIF-1), resulting in the secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by tumor cells. In addition, increased HIF-1 activity further up regulates that of LDH, resulting in the formation of a positive feedback loop, and a tumor microenvironment that is conducive to tumor angiogenesis and metastasis.22,23 Furthermore, according to the Warburg effect, the serum level of LDH is positively correlated with glucose uptake, tumor tissue metabolism, and tumor invasiveness.24 Consequently, up regulation of serum LDH levels is tightly associated with poor outcome.21 Through further analysis, we found that the levels of LDH and CRP were positively correlated with the levels of SCC-Ag, one of the currently used prognostic indicators of cervical cancer. Duk et al found that SCC-Ag is associated with cervical cancer FIGO stage and tumor size,25 while Guo et al reported that cervical cancer patients with elevated levels of SCC-Ag(>2.75mg/mL) had worse prognosis.26 In the present study, patients were further divided into four groups, namely, a group with high levels of LDH and CRP, a group with a high level of LDH, a group with a high level of CRP, and a group with low levels of both LDH and CRP. The analysis showed that the group with high levels of both LDH and CRP had the worst prognosis among the four groups. In addition, we found that LDH levels were positively correlated with those of CRP. Few studies have combined these two indicators in outcome evaluation. In our previous study, we found that patients with high preoperative LDH or CRP levels had a worse prognosis in resectable cervical cancer; however, no association was found between the two serum parameters. There were some limitations in our research. First, this was a retrospective study involving only two centers, and a multi-center study should be performed in future research. Second, we only evaluated systemic-inflammation related parameters, and other laboratory indicators should be combined in future investigations to improve cervical cancer prognosis.

Conclusion

In summary, for the first time, we used a combined evaluation of LDH and CRP levels to predict the prognosis of patients with cervical cancer after CCRT. In the present study, both high pre-radiotherapy LDH and CRP levels and increased pre-/post-radiotherapy LDH and CRP ratios were correlated with worst OS in locally advanced cervical cancer. These convenient clinical indicators may be combined in the near future to guide the personalized treatment of cervical cancer patients.
  26 in total

1.  Lactate Dehydrogenase Isozymes: Dissociation and Recombination of Subunits.

Authors:  C L Markert
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-06-21       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Hypoxia--a key regulatory factor in tumour growth.

Authors:  Adrian L Harris
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Prognostic significance of laboratory parameters measured at diagnosis in small cell carcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  R L Souhami; I Bradbury; D M Geddes; S G Spiro; P G Harper; J S Tobias
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 activation by aerobic glycolysis implicates the Warburg effect in carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Huasheng Lu; Robert A Forbes; Ajay Verma
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-04-09       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Cancer statistics in China, 2015.

Authors:  Wanqing Chen; Rongshou Zheng; Peter D Baade; Siwei Zhang; Hongmei Zeng; Freddie Bray; Ahmedin Jemal; Xue Qin Yu; Jie He
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  C-reactive protein is a prognostic parameter in patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Stephan Polterauer; Christoph Grimm; Clemens Tempfer; Gerhard Sliutz; Paul Speiser; Alexander Reinthaller; Lukas A Hefler
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Significance of preoperative elevation of serum C-reactive protein as an indicator for prognosis in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  T Nozoe; T Matsumata; M Kitamura; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Surgical principles for managing stage IB2, IIA2, and IIB uterine cervical cancer (Bulky Tumors) in Japan: a survey of the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group.

Authors:  Mikio Mikami; Yoichi Aoki; Masaru Sakamoto; Muneaki Shimada; Nobuhiro Takeshima; Hisaya Fujiwara; Takashi Matsumoto; Tunekazu Kita; Ken Takizawa
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.437

9.  Clinicopathological significance and prognostic value of lactate dehydrogenase A expression in gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Xuren Sun; Zhe Sun; Zhi Zhu; Haixia Guan; Junyan Zhang; Yining Zhang; Huimian Xu; Mingjun Sun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.752

10.  Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer.

Authors:  Emma J Crosbie; Mark H Einstein; Silvia Franceschi; Henry C Kitchener
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  9 in total

1.  Predictive Value of the Hemoglobin-Albumin-Lymphocyte-Platelet (HALP) Index on the Oncological Outcomes of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Kittinun Leetanaporn; Jitti Hanprasertpong
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 3.602

2.  Diagnosis Value of Combined Detection of Serum SF, CEA and CRP in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Jing Zhou; Xin Diao; Shengyu Wang; Yang Yao
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  The novel pretreatment immune prognostic index discriminates survival outcomes in locally advanced non-operative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: a 6-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Yilin Yu; Haishan Wu; Jianjian Qiu; Dongmei Ke; Yahua Wu; Mingqiang Lin; Qunhao Zheng; Hongying Zheng; Zhiping Wang; Hui Li; Lingyun Liu; Jiancheng Li; Qiwei Yao
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 4.803

4.  Association Between Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and All-Cause Mortality and Cause-Specific Mortality in US Adults, 1999-2014.

Authors:  Yang Chen; Wei Wang; Lizhong Zeng; Ke Mi; Na Li; Jie Shi; Shuanying Yang
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-12-22

5.  Effect of Psychological Care Combined with Traditional Chinese Medicine on Postoperative Psychological Stress Response in Patients with Advanced Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Xue Hou; Huajuan Zhang; Yahong Nie; Yun Zhang; Jinhua Wang; Hua Xu
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 2.629

6.  Association of lung immune prognostic index with survival outcome in advanced thymic carcinoma patients treated with palliative intent chemotherapy.

Authors:  Taisuke Araki; Kazunari Tateishi; Masamichi Komatsu; Kei Sonehara; Shintaro Kanda; Masayuki Hanaoka; Tomonobu Koizumi
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2022-02-13       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Age-Dependent Hematologic Toxicity Profiles and Prognostic Serologic Markers in Postoperative Radiochemotherapy Treatment for Uterine Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Eva Meixner; Line Hoeltgen; Philipp Hoegen; Laila König; Nathalie Arians; Laura L Michel; Katharina Smetanay; Carlo Fremd; Andreas Schneeweiss; Jürgen Debus; Juliane Hörner-Rieber
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

8.  LINC00963 May Be Associated with a Poor Prognosis in Patients with Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Aimin Chang; Ping Wang; Jingjing Ren
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2022-07-12

9.  C-Reactive Protein as a Prognostic Biomarker for Gynecologic Cancers: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yingying Yang; Xiu Li; Hui Qian; Guangci Di; Ruhua Zhou; Yuwei Dong; Wenyue Chen; Qingling Ren
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-10-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.