Literature DB >> 32103848

On Easiest Functions for Mutation Operators in Bio-Inspired Optimisation.

Dogan Corus1, Jun He2, Thomas Jansen2, Pietro S Oliveto1, Dirk Sudholt1, Christine Zarges2.   

Abstract

Understanding which function classes are easy and which are hard for a given algorithm is a fundamental question for the analysis and design of bio-inspired search heuristics. A natural starting point is to consider the easiest and hardest functions for an algorithm. For the (1+1) EA using standard bit mutation (SBM) it is well known that OneMax is an easiest function with unique optimum while Trap is a hardest. In this paper we extend the analysis of easiest function classes to the contiguous somatic hypermutation (CHM) operator used in artificial immune systems. We define a function MinBlocks and prove that it is an easiest function for the (1+1) EA using CHM, presenting both a runtime and a fixed budget analysis. Since MinBlocks is, up to a factor of 2, a hardest function for standard bit mutations, we consider the effects of combining both operators into a hybrid algorithm. We rigorously prove that by combining the advantages of k operators, several hybrid algorithmic schemes have optimal asymptotic performance on the easiest functions for each individual operator. In particular, the hybrid algorithms using CHM and SBM have optimal asymptotic performance on both OneMax and MinBlocks. We then investigate easiest functions for hybrid schemes and show that an easiest function for a hybrid algorithm is not just a trivial weighted combination of the respective easiest functions for each operator.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial immune systems; Evolutionary algorithms; Hybridisation; Running time analysis; Theory

Year:  2016        PMID: 32103848      PMCID: PMC7010401          DOI: 10.1007/s00453-016-0201-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Algorithmica        ISSN: 0178-4617            Impact factor:   0.791


  3 in total

1.  Analysis of Randomised Search Heuristics for Dynamic Optimisation.

Authors:  Thomas Jansen; Christine Zarges
Journal:  Evol Comput       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.277

2.  The cooperative coevolutionary (1+1) EA.

Authors:  Thomas Jansen; R Paul Wiegand
Journal:  Evol Comput       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.277

3.  On the choice of the offspring population size in evolutionary algorithms.

Authors:  Thomas Jansen; Kenneth A De Jong; Ingo Wegener
Journal:  Evol Comput       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.277

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  How to Escape Local Optima in Black Box Optimisation: When Non-elitism Outperforms Elitism.

Authors:  Pietro S Oliveto; Tiago Paixão; Jorge Pérez Heredia; Dirk Sudholt; Barbora Trubenová
Journal:  Algorithmica       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 0.791

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.