Literature DB >> 32103397

Comprehensive analysis of the associations between previous pregnancy failures and blastocyst aneuploidy as well as pregnancy outcomes after PGT-A.

Tianxiang Ni1,2,3,4, Qianqian Wu1,2,3,4, Yueting Zhu1,2,3,4, Wenjie Jiang1,2,3,4, Qian Zhang1,2,3,4, Yan Li1,2,3,4, Junhao Yan5,6,7,8, Zi-Jiang Chen1,2,3,4,9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the associations of previous pregnancy failures, including implantation failures (IFs), biochemical pregnancy losses (BPLs), and early (EMs) and late miscarriages (LMs), with blastocyst aneuploidy and pregnancy outcomes after PGT-A.
METHODS: This study included 792 couples who underwent PGT-A after multiple pregnancy failures. Subgroup analyses were used to compare the blastocyst aneuploidy rate (BAR), implantation rate (IR), early miscarriage rate (EMR), and live birth rate (LBR). Multiple linear and logistic regression models were used to evaluate the associations. The control group comprised couples with ≤ 2 IFs, ≤ 1 BPL, ≤ 1 EM, and no LM.
RESULTS: Notably, a history of ≥ 4 IFs was significantly associated with an increase in aneuploid blastocysts (42.86% vs. 33.05%, P = 0.044, B = 10.23 for 4 IFs; 48.80% vs. 33.05%, P = 0.002, B = 14.43 for ≥ 5 IFs). Women with ≥ 4 prior EMs also harbored more aneuploid blastocysts (41.00% vs. 33.05%, P = 0.048; B = 9.23). Compared with the control group, women with ≥ 4 prior EMs had a significantly higher EMR (6.58% vs. 31.11%, P < 0.001, OR = 6.49) and a lower LBR (53.49% vs. 34.18%, P = 0.007, OR = 0.56) after euploid transfer. Moreover, a history of LM(s) was associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes after PGT-A (OR for EM = 3.16; OR for live birth = 0.48). However, previous BPLs and 2 EMs were not associated significantly with blastocyst aneuploidy and pregnancy outcomes after PGT-A.
CONCLUSION: A history of high-order IFs or EMs and existence of LM(s) were significantly associated with blastocyst aneuploidy and adverse pregnancy outcomes after PGT-A, whereas no such associations were observed with BPLs or 2 EMs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Embryonic aneuploidy; Implantation failure; Live birth; Miscarriage; Preimplantation genetic testing

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32103397      PMCID: PMC7125264          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01722-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  25 in total

1.  Prognosis for live birth in women with recurrent miscarriage: what is the best measure of success?

Authors:  Marie Lund; Mads Kamper-Jørgensen; Henriette Svarre Nielsen; Øjvind Lidegaard; Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen; Ole Bjarne Christiansen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Time to conception and time to live birth in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage.

Authors:  S P Kaandorp; T E van Mens; S Middeldorp; B A Hutten; M H P Hof; J A M van der Post; F van der Veen; M Goddijn
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 3.  Clinical application of embryo aneuploidy testing by next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Carmen Rubio; Lorena Rodrigo; Carmen Garcia-Pascual; Vanessa Peinado; Inmaculada Campos-Galindo; Sandra Garcia-Herrero; Carlos Simón
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 4.285

4.  Status of preimplantation genetic testing and embryo selection.

Authors:  Santiago Munné
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.828

5.  Estimates of human fertility and pregnancy loss.

Authors:  M J Zinaman; E D Clegg; C C Brown; J O'Connor; S G Selevan
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is cost-effective, shortens treatment time, and reduces the risk of failed embryo transfer and clinical miscarriage.

Authors:  Shelby A Neal; Scott J Morin; Jason M Franasiak; Linnea R Goodman; Caroline R Juneau; Eric J Forman; Marie D Werner; Richard T Scott
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a comparison of live birth rates in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss due to embryonic aneuploidy or recurrent implantation failure.

Authors:  Takeshi Sato; Mayumi Sugiura-Ogasawara; Fumiko Ozawa; Toshiyuki Yamamoto; Takema Kato; Hiroki Kurahashi; Tomoko Kuroda; Naoki Aoyama; Keiichi Kato; Ryota Kobayashi; Aisaku Fukuda; Takafumi Utsunomiya; Akira Kuwahara; Hidekazu Saito; Toshiyuki Takeshita; Minoru Irahara
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Ruth Bender Atik; Ole Bjarne Christiansen; Janine Elson; Astrid Marie Kolte; Sheena Lewis; Saskia Middeldorp; Willianne Nelen; Braulio Peramo; Siobhan Quenby; Nathalie Vermeulen; Mariëtte Goddijn
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2018-04-06

9.  Role of maternal age and pregnancy history in risk of miscarriage: prospective register based study.

Authors:  Maria C Magnus; Allen J Wilcox; Nils-Halvdan Morken; Clarice R Weinberg; Siri E Håberg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-03-20

10.  Two-year outcome after recurrent first trimester miscarriages: prognostic value of the past obstetric history.

Authors:  Christiane Kling; Julia Magez; Jürgen Hedderich; Sören von Otte; Dieter Kabelitz
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.