| Literature DB >> 32103181 |
Thomas D Wu1, Shravan Madireddi2, Patricia E de Almeida2, Romain Banchereau3, Ying-Jiun J Chen4, Avantika S Chitre2, Eugene Y Chiang2, Hina Iftikhar2, William E O'Gorman5, Amelia Au-Yeung5, Chikara Takahashi5, Leonard D Goldstein6, Chungkee Poon7, Shilpa Keerthivasan2, Denise E de Almeida Nagata2, Xiangnan Du2, Hyang-Mi Lee2, Karl L Banta2, Sanjeev Mariathasan3, Meghna Das Thakur8, Mahrukh A Huseni8, Marcus Ballinger8, Ivette Estay8, Patrick Caplazi9, Zora Modrusan4, Lélia Delamarre2, Ira Mellman2, Richard Bourgon6, Jane L Grogan10.
Abstract
Despite the resounding clinical success in cancer treatment of antibodies that block the interaction of PD1 with its ligand PDL11, the mechanisms involved remain unknown. A major limitation to understanding the origin and fate of T cells in tumour immunity is the lack of quantitative information on the distribution of individual clonotypes of T cells in patients with cancer. Here, by performing deep single-cell sequencing of RNA and T cell receptors in patients with different types of cancer, we survey the profiles of various populations of T cells and T cell receptors in tumours, normal adjacent tissue, and peripheral blood. We find clear evidence of clonotypic expansion of effector-like T cells not only within the tumour but also in normal adjacent tissue. Patients with gene signatures of such clonotypic expansion respond best to anti-PDL1 therapy. Notably, expanded clonotypes found in the tumour and normal adjacent tissue can also typically be detected in peripheral blood, which suggests a convenient approach to patient identification. Analyses of our data together with several external datasets suggest that intratumoural T cells, especially in responsive patients, are replenished with fresh, non-exhausted replacement cells from sites outside the tumour, suggesting continued activity of the cancer immunity cycle in these patients, the acceleration of which may be associated with clinical response.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32103181 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2056-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nature ISSN: 0028-0836 Impact factor: 69.504