| Literature DB >> 32102832 |
Clara M Cruet-Burgos1,2, Hugo E Cuevas3, Louis K Prom4, Joseph E Knoll5, Lauren R Stutts6, Wilfred Vermerris7.
Abstract
Sorghum production is expanding to warmer and more humid regions where its production is being limited by multiple fungal pathogens. Anthracnose, caused by Colletotrichum sublineolum, is one of the major diseases in these regions, where it can cause yield losses of both grain and biomass. In this study, 114 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) derived from resistant sorghum line SC112-14 were evaluated at four distinct geographic locations in the United States for response to anthracnose. A genome scan using a high-density linkage map of 3,838 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) detected two loci at 5.25 and 1.18 Mb on chromosomes 5 and 6, respectively, that explain up to 59% and 44% of the observed phenotypic variation. A bin-mapping approach using a subset of 31 highly informative RILs was employed to determine the disease response to inoculation with ten anthracnose pathotypes in the greenhouse. A genome scan showed that the 5.25 Mb region on chromosome 5 is associated with a resistance response to nine pathotypes. Five SNP markers were developed and used to fine map the locus on chromosome 5 by evaluating 1,500 segregating F2:3 progenies. Based on the genotypic and phenotypic analyses of 11 recombinants, the locus was narrowed down to a 470-kb genomic region. Following a genome-wide association study based on 574 accessions previously phenotyped and genotyped, the resistance locus was delimited to a 34-kb genomic interval with five candidate genes. All five candidate genes encode proteins associated with plant immune systems, suggesting they may act in synergy in the resistance response.Entities:
Keywords: Anthracnose; Genome mapping; Genotype-by-sequencing; KASP markers; Sorghum
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32102832 PMCID: PMC7144069 DOI: 10.1534/g3.120.401121
Source DB: PubMed Journal: G3 (Bethesda) ISSN: 2160-1836 Impact factor: 3.154
Analysis of variance for anthracnose resistance response of the recombinant inbred line (RILs) population derived from the cross between SC112-14 and PI609251 evaluated at four locations in 2016
| Overall | Florida | Georgia | Texas | Puerto Rico | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source | df | Source | df | df | df | df | |||||
| Location | 3 | ** | Block | 1 | ** | 1 | n.s. | 1 | n.s. | 1 | n.s. |
| Location (Block) | 4 | n.s. | RIL | 105 | *** | 105 | *** | 107 | *** | 108 | *** |
| RIL | 113 | *** | |||||||||
| RIL x Location | 311 | *** | |||||||||
n.s., ** and *** refers to no significance and significant differences at P < 0.01 and 0.001, respectively.
Average and standard deviations of anthracnose resistance response of parental lines and 114 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) derived from the cross between SC112-14 and PI609251 evaluated at four locations in 2016
| Florida | Georgia | Texas | Puerto Rico | Overall | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X ± SD. | X ± SD. | X ± SD. | X ± SD. | X ± SD. | ||||||
| SC112-14 | 2.0 ± 0.0 | 2.0 ± 0.0 | 2.0 ± 0.0 | 2.0 ± 0.0 | 2.0 ± 0.0 | |||||
| PI 609251 | 4.0 ± 0.0 | 4.0 ± 0.0 | 3.1 ± 0.3 | 4.8 ± 0.5 | 3.7 ± 0.7 | |||||
| RILs | 3.1 ± 1.1 | 3.2 ± 1.1 | 2.7 ± 0.7 | 3.5 ± 1.2 | 3.1 ± 0.9 | |||||
| RILs | χ2 | RILs | χ2 | RILs | χ2 | RILs | χ2 | RILs | χ2 | |
| Resistant | 41 | 0.02 | 39 | 0.01 | 45 | 0.08 | 33 | <0.001 | 18 | <0.001 |
| Susceptible | 65 | 67 | 63 | 78 | 96 | |||||
Anthracnose resistance response based on 1-5 scale (Prom ), where 1-2 are considered resistant and 3-5 susceptible. χ2 refer to chi-square test against the 1:1 expected segregation ratio.
Comparison of two genetic linkage maps constructed with 108 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) derived from the cross between SC112-14 and PI609251 and a subset of RILs selected based on recombination events (i.e., bin map)
| RILs (n = 108) | Bin Map (n = 31) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chromosome | SNPs1 | Bin No. | Length (cM) | SNPs | Bin No. | Length (cM) |
| 1 | 579 | 149 | 217.55 | 573 | 94 | 277.00 |
| 2 | 466 | 100 | 151.35 | 466 | 55 | 153.00 |
| 3 | 316 | 79 | 147.24 | 315 | 56 | 175.25 |
| 4 | 479 | 89 | 147.89 | 473 | 47 | 128.26 |
| 5 | 378 | 85 | 129.79 | 376 | 57 | 187.22 |
| 6 | 420 | 86 | 140.60 | 419 | 56 | 179.57 |
| 7 | 247 | 58 | 122.60 | 247 | 39 | 133.34 |
| 8 | 287 | 58 | 115.29 | 287 | 46 | 164.55 |
| 9 | 390 | 74 | 129.83 | 390 | 44 | 122.98 |
| 10 | 276 | 66 | 120.77 | 276 | 43 | 122.33 |
| Total | 3838 | 844 | 1422.90 | 3822 | 537 | 1643.49 |
Single nucleotide polymorphism identified by the genotype-by-sequencing analysis of the RIL population.
Genomic regions associated with the anthracnose resistance response reveled by the QTL analysis of the recombinant inbred line population derived from the cross between SC112-14 and PI609251 evaluated at four locations in 2016
| Location | Chromosome | Region (Mbp) | LOD | P.V.E |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | 5 | 64.19 - 65.20 | 9.80 | 23 |
| Georgia | 5 | 62.23 - 67.59 | 23.97 | 39 |
| Florida | 5 | 62.88 - 66.73 | 16.89 | 56 |
| 6 | 42.75 - 42.78 | 5.18 | 44 | |
| Puerto Rico | 5 | 62.35 - 67.57 | 29.56 | 59 |
| Overall | 5 | 62.34 - 67.59 | 28.98 | 30 |
LOD values based on composite interval mapping as implemented in QTL Cartographer using a 3,838 SNPs linkage map.
Percent of variance explained by the QTL.
Figure 1Composite interval mapping of anthracnose resistance response of 108 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) derived from the cross between SC112-14 and PI609251. Red horizontal lines mark an experiment-wise significance threshold of P <0.001 based on 1000 permutations.
Anthracnose resistance response of 31 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) derived from the cross between SC112-14 (P1) and PI609251 (P2) evaluated in the greenhouse against 10 different pathotypes from Texas (TX), Georgia (GA), Arkansas (AR) and Puerto Rico (PR)
| TX | PR | GA | AR | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIL | Ant. | Path.26 | Path.20 | Path.29 | Path.31 | Path.36 | Path.32 | Path.35 | AMP 48 | AMP50 | AMP46 |
| P1 | 2.00 | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| P2 | 5.00 | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| # 081 | 1.59 | R | R | R | R/S | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| # 098 | 1.60 | R | R/S | R | R | R | n.a. | R | R | R | R |
| # 039 | 2.00 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | R | n.a. | R | n.a. | R | R | R |
| # 135 | 2.00 | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| # 075 | n.a. | R | R | R | R | R | R/S | R | R | R | R |
| # 130 | n.a. | R | R/S | R/S | R/S | R/S | R/S | R | R | R/S | R |
| # 033 | 2.13 | R | R/S | R/S | R/S | R | R | R | S | R | R |
| # 080 | 2.13 | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| # 108 | 2.18 | R/S | R/S | R/S | R/S | S | R | R | R/S | R | R |
| # 026 | 2.25 | S | R/S | S | n.a. | R/S | R/S | R/S | R/S | R/S | n.a. |
| # 041 | 2.34 | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R/S | R |
| # 089 | 2.47 | n.a. | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| # 035 | 2.63 | R | R | R | R/S | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| # 088 | 2.88 | R | S | R | R | R/S | R | R/S | R | R | R |
| # 125 | 2.93 | n.a. | n.a. | R | S | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | S | n.a. |
| # 028 | 2.97 | R/S | S | R/S | S | S | R/S | R/S | R/S | R/S | S |
| # 058 | 3.32 | R | R | R | R/S | S | R | S | R | R | R |
| # 050 | 3.38 | R/S | S | R | R/S | R | R | R | R | R/S | R |
| # 119 | 3.50 | n.a. | R | n.a. | R | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | R | n.a. | n.a. |
| # 002 | 4.00 | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| # 027 | 4.03 | R/S | S | R/S | R/S | R/S | R/S | R/S | S | S | S |
| # 086 | 4.06 | R | R/S | R/S | R/S | R/S | R/S | R/S | R | R/S | R |
| # 034 | 4.13 | R/S | S | S | S | S | S | S | R | R/S | S |
| # 008 | 4.38 | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | R | R/S | S |
| # 009 | 4.38 | S | S | S | S | S | S | R/S | R/S | S | S |
| # 127 | 4.50 | S | S | S | S | S | S | R/S | R | S | S |
| # 104 | 4.60 | R/S | S | R/S | S | R/S | S | R/S | R/S | R/S | R/S |
| # 123 | 4.63 | R | S | R | R/S | R | R | R/S | R | R/S | R |
| # 122 | n.a. | R/S | R/S | R/S | R/S | R | R/S | R | R/S | R/S | R/S |
| # 024 | n.a. | S | S | S | S | S | S | R/S | S | S | S |
| # 025 | n.a. | S | S | S | R/S | S | R/S | R/S | S | S | S |
Anthracnose resistance response in the field based on 1-5 scale (Prom ), where 1-2 are considered resistant and 3-5 susceptible.
R and S refer to resistant and susceptible, respectively. R/S refer to segregation among the three replications.
Genomic regions associated with the anthracnose resistance response revealed by the association analysis of 31 recombinant inbred lines derived from the cross between SC112-14 and PI609251 evaluated against 10 C. sublineolum isolates under controlled conditions in the greenhouse
| Origin | Pathotype | Chromosome | Region (Mbp) | -log p ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | Path.26 | 5 | 64.92 – 65.13 | 5.34 |
| Path.20 | 5 | 67.77 – 65.20 | 9.70 | |
| Path.29 | 5 | 64.92 | 5.04 | |
| Path.31 | 5 | 64.84 – 65.20 | 6.36 | |
| Puerto Rico | Path.36 | 5 | 64.77 – 65.02 | 5.85 |
| Path.32 | 5 | 64.84 – 65.19 | 6.31 | |
| Georgia | Path.35 | 5 | 64.19 – 65.20 | 7.72 |
| Arkansas | AMP50 | 5 | 64.84 – 65.20 | 6.23 |
| AMP46 | 5 | 64.82 – 65.20 | 15.82 | |
| AMP48 | ||||
-log p(value) based on the single marker analysis of 3,822 SNPs linkage map.
Figure 2Genomic dissection of anthracnose resistance response in sorghum line SC112-14. A) Fine-mapping of the anthracnose resistance locus (Cg_SC112) on chromosome 5 based on the analysis of 1,500 segregating F2:3 progenies derived from crossing SC112-14 with PI609251. B) Manhattan plots for logistic regression based on a case-control analysis (i.e., resistant or susceptible) of 574 accessions from the SAP and NPGS Ethiopian collection. Horizontal lines mark significance thresholds [P <0.05 (dashed) and P <0.001 (dotted)]. C) Delimited genomic regions and candidate genes in the Cg_SC112 anthracnose resistance locus.