Charlie J Nederpelt1, Majed El Hechi, Jonathan Parks, Jason Fawley, April E Mendoza, Noelle Saillant, David R King, Peter J Fagenholz, George C Velmahos, Haytham M A Kaafarani. 1. From the Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care (C.J.N., M.E.H., J.P., J.F., A.E.M., N.S., D.R.K., P.J.F., G.C.V., H.M.A.K.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Trauma Surgery (C.J.N.), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Harvard Medical School (J.P., J.F., A.E.M., N.S., D.R.K., P.J.F., G.C.V., H.M.A.K.), Cambridge; and Center for Outcomes and Patient Safety in Surgery (COMPASS) (H.M.A.K.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The relationship between total transfusion volume and infection in the trauma patient remains unclear, especially at lower volumes of transfusion. We sought to quantify the cumulative, independent impact of transfusion within 24 hours of admission on the risk of infection in trauma patients. METHODS: Using the Trauma Quality Improvement Program 2013 to 2016 database, we included all patients who received blood transfusions in the first 4 hours. Patients who were transferred or had incomplete/wrongly coded information on transfusion volume were excluded. Patients were divided into 20 cohorts based on the total blood product volume transfused in the first 24 hours. A composite infection variable (INF) was created, including surgical site infection, ventilator-associated pneumonia, urinary tract infection, central line associated blood stream infection, and sepsis. Univariate and stepwise multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to study the relationship between blood transfusion and INF, controlling for demographics (e.g., age, sex), comorbidities (e.g., cirrhosis, diabetes, steroid use), severity of injury (e.g., vital signs on arrival, mechanism, Injury Severity Score), and operative and angiographic interventions. RESULTS: Of 1,002,595 patients, 37,568 were included. The mean age was 42 ± 18.6 years, 74.6% were males, 68% had blunt trauma, and median Injury Severity Score was 25 [17-34]. Adjusting for all available confounders, odds of INF increased incrementally from 1.00 (reference, 0-2 units) to 1.23 (95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.37) for 4 units transfused to 4.89 (95% confidence interval, 2.72-8.80) for 40 units transfused. Each additional unit increased the odds of INF by 7.6%. CONCLUSION: Transfusion of the bleeding trauma patient was associated with a dose-dependent increased risk of infectious complications. Trauma surgeons and anesthesiologists should resuscitate the trauma patient until prompt hemorrhage control while avoiding overtransfusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study, Therapeutic IV.
OBJECTIVE: The relationship between total transfusion volume and infection in the traumapatient remains unclear, especially at lower volumes of transfusion. We sought to quantify the cumulative, independent impact of transfusion within 24 hours of admission on the risk of infection in traumapatients. METHODS: Using the Trauma Quality Improvement Program 2013 to 2016 database, we included all patients who received blood transfusions in the first 4 hours. Patients who were transferred or had incomplete/wrongly coded information on transfusion volume were excluded. Patients were divided into 20 cohorts based on the total blood product volume transfused in the first 24 hours. A composite infection variable (INF) was created, including surgical site infection, ventilator-associated pneumonia, urinary tract infection, central line associated blood stream infection, and sepsis. Univariate and stepwise multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to study the relationship between blood transfusion and INF, controlling for demographics (e.g., age, sex), comorbidities (e.g., cirrhosis, diabetes, steroid use), severity of injury (e.g., vital signs on arrival, mechanism, Injury Severity Score), and operative and angiographic interventions. RESULTS: Of 1,002,595 patients, 37,568 were included. The mean age was 42 ± 18.6 years, 74.6% were males, 68% had blunt trauma, and median Injury Severity Score was 25 [17-34]. Adjusting for all available confounders, odds of INF increased incrementally from 1.00 (reference, 0-2 units) to 1.23 (95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.37) for 4 units transfused to 4.89 (95% confidence interval, 2.72-8.80) for 40 units transfused. Each additional unit increased the odds of INF by 7.6%. CONCLUSION: Transfusion of the bleeding traumapatient was associated with a dose-dependent increased risk of infectious complications. Trauma surgeons and anesthesiologists should resuscitate the traumapatient until prompt hemorrhage control while avoiding overtransfusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study, Therapeutic IV.
Authors: Kasiemobi E Pulliam; Bernadin Joseph; Amy T Makley; Charles C Caldwell; Alex B Lentsch; Michael D Goodman; Timothy A Pritts Journal: Surgery Date: 2021-12-30 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Husayn A Ladhani; Vanessa P Ho; C Clare Charbonnet; Jason L Sperry; Francis X Guyette; Joshua B Brown; Brian J Daley; Richard S Miller; Brian G Harbrecht; Herb A Phelan; Jeffrey A Claridge Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2021-08-01 Impact factor: 3.697
Authors: Galinos Barmparas; Raymond Huang; William G Lee; Yassar M Hashim; Samuel H Pepkowitz; Ellen B Klapper; Daniel R Margulies Journal: Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Date: 2022-07-26
Authors: Jesper Eriksson; Ann-Charlotte Lindström; Elisabeth Hellgren; Ola Friman; Emma Larsson; Mikael Eriksson; Anders Oldner Journal: Crit Care Explor Date: 2021-08-02