Literature DB >> 32101823

Examining multiple paternity in the raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in Japan using microsatellite analysis.

Natsuko Sugiura1,2, Kazuhiko Ochiai2, Toshiaki Yamamoto3, Takuya Kato1, Yoshi Kawamoto1, Toshinori Omi2, Shin-Ichi Hayama1.   

Abstract

We analyzed the genotypes of three pregnant females and their litters to investigate the phenomenon of multiple paternity in wild raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) using 17 microsatellite markers. If a female has mated with only one male during estrus, then the maximum number of paternal alleles will not exceed two among littermates with the same father. The results revealed two out of three litters had three or four paternal alleles at one or five microsatellite loci. Therefore, the female had mated with more than one male during estrus. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to report the possibility of multiple paternity in wild raccoon dogs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  microsatellite; multiple paternity; raccoon dog

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32101823      PMCID: PMC7192729          DOI: 10.1292/jvms.19-0655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Med Sci        ISSN: 0916-7250            Impact factor:   1.267


The raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) is native to Japan and is considered a monogamous carnivore. The home ranges of a male and female pair overlap almost totally [11, 20]. In captivity, estrus, the period when females are willing to mate, has been found to last for 3.9 ± 1.2 days [27]. The gestation period is 61.0 ± 2.0 days [27] and pregnant females give birth to 4–6 offspring between late spring and early summer [10]. A previous study reported that in captive raccoon dogs, females mated with several males and a litter was sired by several males [23]. This phenomenon has been called “multiple paternity”. Multiple paternity has been shown in several wild carnivore species [1, 3, 5, 17, 19, 28, 29] and, in some cases, multiple paternity has been observed in carnivore species originally thought to be monogamous [1, 5, 19]. However, multiple paternity has not been reported in wild raccoon dogs. In foxes, which are also monogamous carnivores, high population density may influence the occurrence of multiple paternity [1, 19]. Although the habitat of raccoon dogs has expanded to urban areas, fragmented natural landscapes result in high population density [15, 16, 21]. Thus, wild raccoon dogs might display multiple paternity under similar conditions. There have been numerous reports on sarcoptic mange in wild raccoon dogs [12, 21, 22]. There might be increased direct contact among raccoon dogs, if females of wild raccoon dogs mate with several males during one estrus. This phenomenon might lead to epizootic disease risk (i.e. sarcoptic mange) of wild raccoon dogs during mating season. The objective of the present study was to examine the phenomenon of multiple paternity in the wild raccoon dog by analyzing the genotypes of three pregnant females and their litters using microsatellite markers. Between March 2014 and March 2018, raccoon dog carcasses were collected in the Misato, Miyazawa, and Jumonji areas of Takasaki City, Gunma Prefecture, Japan. These animals were captured as part of pest control measures for the prevention of agricultural damage and they were killed by licensed hunters on behalf of Takasaki City. Among these raccoon dog carcasses, three pregnant females were targeted (Table 1). When the animals were dissected, muscle tissue samples from the mothers and fetuses were taken and the canine teeth of the mothers were collected for age estimation. Collected samples were frozen at −20°C until each subsequent analysis was performed.
Table 1.

Information on each mother

Date of captureEstimated ageLitter size
Litter 12014/5/218
Litter 22017/4/2833
Litter 32017/5/1613
Total DNA was extracted from muscle tissue samples using DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) and the DNA extracts were stored at 4°C. We used a Canine Genotypes Panel 1.1 Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) to amplify 18 microsatellite loci using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR was performed with 4.5 µl of Primer Mix, 4.5 µl of Master Mix (Buffer, dNTP, Phusion Hot Start DNA Polymerase), and 1 µl of DNA extract (1 ng/µl). Thermocycling conditions were 98°C for 3 min; followed by 30 cycles of 98°C for 15 sec, 60°C for 75 sec, and 72°C for 30 sec; and finally 72°C for 5 min. PCR fragments were sequenced with an ABI 310 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and microsatellite genotypes were determined by Peak Scanner Software v1.0 (Applied Biosystems). PCR was performed several times to confirm genotypes reproducibility. The genotypes among mothers and fetuses were compared. One (AHTh260) out of 18 loci was removed from the analysis because its genotype was indeterminate. The microsatellite genotype of each individual was determined for 16–17 loci. Comparing the genotype of litter 1 and their mother, the littermates showed more than two non-maternal alleles at INU055, AHT137, AHTk253, INU005, and FH2848, where the numbers of postulated paternally derived alleles were three, three, three, four, and three, respectively (Table 2). Consequently, extra paternity was confirmed in 5 out of 17 marker loci for litter 1. There was no evidence of multiple paternity in litter 2 (data not shown), with all littermates explained assuming a single father. Three paternal alleles were detected at the INU030 locus in litter 3, which suggested multiple paternity among littermates (Table 3).
Table 2.

Summary of genotypes for litter 1

Genotype
AHTk211CXX279REN169018INU055REN54P11INRA21

Mother95/97-159/170205/207242/24873/80
N189/97-165/170205/205242/24873/80
N289/97-165/170205/205242/24873/80
N389/97115/115159/165201/207242/24273/73
N489/97119/119159/165205/205242/24273/80
N589/97119/119159/165205/207242/24273/80
N691/97-159/165207/207242/24873/73
N789/97-165/170205/207242/24873/73
N889/97-159/165205/207242/24273/80

AHT137REN169D01AHTk253INU005INU030FH2848

Mother139/149205/207294/29497/107141/145233/235
N1135/149205/205283/294107/107145/147233/237
N2135/139205/207283/294107/107145/147233/235
N3115/149205/207291/294107/115141/145233/233
N4119/139205/207283/294107/119141/145233/235
N5119/139205/207294/298107/119145/147233/235
N6135/139205/207294/29873/107141/145233/235
N7135/149205/207283/29473/107145/147233/237
N8135/139205/207294/298107/107145/147235/235

AHT121FH2054REN162C04AHT h171REN247M23

Mother79/107155/159202/212226/230271/277
N1107/107151/159202/212224/230273/277
N2107/107151/159202/202226/228271/273
N3107/107151/155202/206224/230275/277
N4107/107151/155202/202224/230271/273
N5107/107151/155202/202228/230271/273
N6107/107159/159206/212224/226271/273
N7107/107151/159202/212228/230273/277
N8107/107151/155202/206228/230271/273

The allele not transmitted from the mother is underlined. The locus with more than three paternal alleles is highlighted.

Table 3.

Summary of genotypes for litter 3

Genotype
AHTk211CXX279REN169018INU055REN54P11 INRA21

Mother91/93115/115166/166205/205243/24873/80
N193/93115/115159/166205/205243/24373/73
N291/93115/115166/166201/205243/24873/80
N391/93115/115159/166205/205243/24373/73

AHT137REN169D01AHTk253INU005INU030FH2848

Mother116/116205/205291/291107/111143/145235/238
N1116/116205/205291/291107/115143/143235/235
N2116/116203/205291/291107/111141/145235/235
N3116/116205/205291/295107/115145/145235/235

AHT121FH2054REN162C04AHTh171REN247M23

Mother115/115138/138202/205224/226273/279
N1115/115138/164202/202224/224273/275
N2115/115138/164198/202224/228273/275
N3107/115138/164202/202224/226275/279

The allele not transmitted from the mother is underlined. The locus with more than three paternal alleles is highlighted.

The allele not transmitted from the mother is underlined. The locus with more than three paternal alleles is highlighted. The allele not transmitted from the mother is underlined. The locus with more than three paternal alleles is highlighted. For litter 1, the genotypes of the fetuses in the 16 loci inherited 1 allele from their mother, excluding 1 locus (CXX279) which was not determined as the genotype of the mother. Considering the other alleles of the fetus, three or four paternal alleles were estimated in 5 (AHT137, INU005, AHTk235, INU055, and FH2848) out of 17 loci (Table 2). In litter 3, three paternal alleles were estimated at one locus (INU030, Table 3). If a female has mated with one male during estrus, then one or two paternal alleles may be shown per locus of the litter. Accordingly, the biological fathers of litters 1 and 3 may have been several males. Microsatellites have mutation rates ranging from 10−3 to 10−4 per locus per generation [4, 6], which is higher than other genetic markers, e.g. mitochondrial DNA and single nucleotide polymorphism [6, 7, 14]. However, if mutation rates from 10−3 per locus per generation occurred at 1 out of 17 loci, then this probability is less than 0.1%. On the other hand, genotyping problems arising from null alleles, artefacts or allele dropout may have occurred [9]. In particular, multiple paternal alleles were estimated at one locus in litter 3; it could not be denied that mistyping was influenced. However, in litter 1, multiple paternal alleles were observed in five markers in N3 (Table 3). Moreover, genotype reproducibility was confirmed by performing PCR several times. Therefore, there was a high probability of multiple paternity in wild raccoon dogs in Japan. The mothers of litters 1 and 3 were estimated to be one year old from the cement of their canine teeth. Raccoon dogs start dispersal during autumn in the year of their birth [20] and sexual maturation occurs at 9–11 months of age [8]. Thus, the mothers of litters 1 and 3 were pregnant for the first time. Raccoon dogs are monogamous animals [11], with adults expected to mate with only their breeding pair. However, young raccoon dogs, immediately after dispersal, might not easily make a breeding pair. Therefore, the mothers of litters 1 and 3 might have mated with several males during one estrus because they were still young and had not decided on a breeding pair. On the other hand, previous studies have reported that the multiple paternity of the fox family and raccoons (Procyon lotor) is influenced by high population density [1, 5, 17, 19]. By undertaking a camera trapping survey in this study area, the population density of the raccoon dogs in 2014 (when the mother of litter 1 was captured) was higher than the year when the other pregnant females were captured [24, 25]. Thus, multiple paternity in wild raccoon dogs might be related to high population density, similar to that seen in foxes and raccoons. A previous study suggested that high encounter rates among raccoons, due to high population density and a male-biased sex ratio, influenced multiple paternity [17]. Hence, multiple paternity of raccoon dogs might be influenced by high encounter rates in high population density, as well. Moreover, male-biased sex ratio might lead to an increase in encounters by females with males and allow greater choosiness without reducing mating opportunities [13, 17]. Female wild raccoon dogs probably mated with several males during a single estrus. It is suggested that wild raccoon dogs make contact with multiple individuals during a single mating season. A relationship between the transmission of infectious disease in the wild and contact rates has been reported [2, 26]. Contact rates during the mating season may relate with the disease transmission process [18]. Thus, mating season may be an important factor in disease (i.e. sarcoptic mange) transmission in raccoon dogs. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to report the possibility of multiple paternity in wild raccoon dogs. However, this result must be verified with more evidence from future studies.
  15 in total

Review 1.  Application of SNP technologies in medicine: lessons learned and future challenges.

Authors:  E Lai
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 2.  Wildlife diseases: from individuals to ecosystems.

Authors:  Daniel M Tompkins; Alison M Dunn; Matthew J Smith; Sandra Telfer
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 5.091

3.  Microsatellite genotyping errors: detection approaches, common sources and consequences for paternal exclusion.

Authors:  J I Hoffman; W Amos
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 4.  Current trends in microsatellite genotyping.

Authors:  E Guichoux; L Lagache; S Wagner; P Chaumeil; P Léger; O Lepais; C Lepoittevin; T Malausa; E Revardel; F Salin; R J Petit
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 7.090

5.  Symptomatic Raccoon Dogs and Sarcoptic Mange Along an Urban Gradient.

Authors:  Masayuki U Saito; Yoichi Sonoda
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.184

6.  Epidemiology of sarcoptic mange in free-ranging raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in Yokohama, Japan.

Authors:  N Kido; M Itabashi; M Takahashi; M Futami
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 2.738

7.  Bi-paternal litter in finn raccoon (Nyctereutes procyonoides Gray 1834) detected by polymorphic DNA markers.

Authors:  Brygida Slaska; Grazyna Jezewska
Journal:  Folia Biol (Krakow)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 0.432

8.  Disease, habitat fragmentation and conservation.

Authors:  Hamish McCallum; Andy Dobson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Reproductive features in the female raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides).

Authors:  M H Valtonen; E J Rajakoski; J I Mäkelä
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1977-11

10.  Direct estimation of the mitochondrial DNA mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Cathy Haag-Liautard; Nicole Coffey; David Houle; Michael Lynch; Brian Charlesworth; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.