| Literature DB >> 32101703 |
Sidhartha R Sinha1, Yeneneh Haileselassie2, Linh P Nguyen2, Carolina Tropini3, Min Wang4, Laren S Becker2, Davis Sim2, Karolin Jarr2, Estelle T Spear2, Gulshan Singh2, Hong Namkoong2, Kyle Bittinger5, Michael A Fischbach6, Justin L Sonnenburg7, Aida Habtezion8.
Abstract
Secondary bile acids (SBAs) are derived from primary bile acids (PBAs) in a process reliant on biosynthetic capabilities possessed by few microbes. To evaluate the role of BAs in intestinal inflammation, we performed metabolomic, microbiome, metagenomic, and transcriptomic profiling of stool from ileal pouches (surgically created resevoirs) in colectomy-treated patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) versus controls (familial adenomatous polyposis [FAP]). We show that relative to FAP, UC pouches have reduced levels of lithocholic acid and deoxycholic acid (normally the most abundant gut SBAs), genes required to convert PBAs to SBAs, and Ruminococcaceae (one of few taxa known to include SBA-producing bacteria). In three murine colitis models, SBA supplementation reduces intestinal inflammation. This anti-inflammatory effect is in part dependent on the TGR5 bile acid receptor. These data suggest that dysbiosis induces SBA deficiency in inflammatory-prone UC patients, which promotes a pro-inflammatory state within the intestine that may be treated by SBA restoration.Entities:
Keywords: bile acids; colitis; dysbiosis; inflammatory bowel disease; metabolomics; pouchitis; ulcerative colitis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32101703 PMCID: PMC8172352 DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.01.021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Host Microbe ISSN: 1931-3128 Impact factor: 21.023