Literature DB >> 32101292

Whole-Genome Sequencing of the NARO World Rice Core Collection (WRC) as the Basis for Diversity and Association Studies.

N Tanaka1, M Shenton1, Y Kawahara1,2, M Kumagai2, H Sakai2, H Kanamori1, J Yonemaru1, S Fukuoka1, K Sugimoto1, M Ishimoto1, J Wu1, K Ebana3.   

Abstract

Genebanks provide access to diverse materials for crop improvement. To utilize and evaluate them effectively, core collections, such as the World Rice Core Collection (WRC) in the Genebank at the National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, have been developed. Because the WRC consists of 69 accessions with a high degree of genetic diversity, it has been used for >300 projects. To allow deeper investigation of existing WRC data and to further promote research using Genebank rice accessions, we performed whole-genome resequencing of these 69 accessions, examining their sequence variation by mapping against the Oryza sativa ssp. japonica Nipponbare genome. We obtained a total of 2,805,329 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 357,639 insertion-deletions. Based on the principal component analysis and population structure analysis of these data, the WRC can be classified into three major groups. We applied TASUKE, a multiple genome browser to visualize the different WRC genome sequences, and classified haplotype groups of genes affecting seed characteristics and heading date. TASUKE thus provides access to WRC genotypes as a tool for reverse genetics. We examined the suitability of the compact WRC population for genome-wide association studies (GWASs). Heading date, affected by a large number of quantitative trait loci (QTLs), was not associated with known genes, but several seed-related phenotypes were associated with known genes. Thus, for QTLs of strong effect, the compact WRC performed well in GWAS. This information enables us to understand genetic diversity in 37,000 rice accessions maintained in the Genebank and to find genes associated with different phenotypes. The sequence data have been deposited in DNA Data Bank of Japan Sequence Read Archive (DRA) (Supplementary Table S1). � The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Japanese Society of Plant Physiologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Core collection; Genetic diversity; Genome-wide association study

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32101292      PMCID: PMC7426033          DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcaa019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0781            Impact factor:   4.927


Introduction

Rice is a staple food on which 50% of the world’s population depends (FAO 2004). The development of new rice cultivars of high yield and quality is crucial for agricultural sustainability and human health (Godfray et�al. 2010). Traditionally, biallelic mapping has been used to identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) related to various agronomic traits in rice (Miura et�al. 2011). However, biallelic mapping can only detect the limited genetic diversity that exists in a biparental population. Therefore, it is necessary to exploit more diverse genetic resources to meet the demand for increased environmentally sustainable rice production and to detect the functions of agriculturally important genes derived from those resources. To this end, there has been a trend toward large-scale resequencing of large germplasm collections (Wang et�al. 2018), but the use of such large collections requires substantial resources of time and money. Thus, the use of core or mini-core germplasm collections is still vitally important for agronomical research. ‘Core collections’, small sets of germplasm representing the genetic diversity in large genebank collections, are a powerful tool enabling the effective use of germplasm. The core collections of several crops have been chosen on the basis of passport data recorded for each accession, to represent variation in phenotypes and geographical characteristics of the germplasm source (Johnson and Hodgkin 1999). Previously, the World Rice Core Collection (WRC) was developed in the National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO) Genebank based on the passport data and restriction enzyme fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers (Kojima et�al. 2005). Because the WRC is a very small population with a high degree of genetic diversity, it has been used for the evaluation of many agricultural traits, such as heading date, seed cadmium concentration and seed dormancy, in >300 research projects (e.g. Takahashi et�al. 2009, Ueno et�al. 2009, Uraguchi et�al. 2009, Sugimoto et�al. 2010, Ogiso-Tanaka et�al. 2013, Itoh et�al. 2018). Genome sequence-based gene discovery can focus on mapping, allele mining or association studies (Jia et�al. 2017). Thus, whole-genome resequencing of a core collection can contribute to the rapid identification of agriculturally important genes by allowing the identification of candidate genes in mapped materials, by allowing haplotype analysis of known loci and by providing single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data for association analyses. In addition, an application to display sequence variation information is needed so that resequencing data of large genomes can be used without specialized skills in handling next-generation sequencing data. For that purpose, the TASUKE system (TA means ‘many’, SUKE means ‘help’ in Japanese; Kumagai et�al. 2013) was developed in NARO as a web application to visualize genome-wide resequencing data. Recently, genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have become common in several crops. Because GWAS is an effective approach for identifying genes from a genetically diverse population, it has been used to detect many QTLs related to agronomical traits in rice (Huang et�al. 2010, 2012, Yano et�al. 2016, Wang et�al. 2017, Yang et�al. 2018) and statistically robust models for GWAS have been developed (Lipka et�al. 2015, Liu et�al. 2016) to deal with population structure. However, large populations commonly used for GWAS are unwieldy and expensive to phenotype (Zhao et�al. 2011, Norton et�al. 2018, Yang et�al. 2018). A diverse, but compact population suitable for GWAS could be very useful to rice researchers. In this study, we performed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of the 69 accessions in the NARO WRC, providing a resource to aid the exploitation of >10 chromosome segment substitution lines populations that are already available (e.g. Nipponbare–Kasalath) or under development (Fukuoka et al., 2010). To enable allele mining, we displayed these data using the TASUKE system (Kumagai et�al. 2013), a web browser visualization system for whole-genome variant data, to examine the haplotypes of agriculturally important genes in the WRC accessions. Finally, we demonstrated that notwithstanding its small size, using appropriate measures to control for population structure, the WRC is viable as a population for GWAS, particularly where the phenotype has a bimodal or binomial distribution.

Results

Diversity of the WRC

The NARO WRC, composed of 69 accessions (Supplementary Table S1), is a useful germplasm set for agronomical research, and >300 seed sets have been distributed to date. In this study, we performed WGS of the 69 accessions and obtained detailed nucleotide polymorphism information. The reads were mapped against the Oryza sativa ssp. japonica Nipponbare genome (Os-Nipponbare-Reference-IRGSP-1.0) (Kawahara et�al. 2013) using bwa (Li and Durbin 2009). The average depth was 38, ranging from 20 to 102; the average number of SNPs and insertion–deletion (indels) per accession were 1,835,874 and 329,670, respectively (Supplementary Table S1). After removing data for positions where genotype data were missing, and selecting biallelic variants with a minor allele frequency (MAF) of >0.05, a total of 2,805,329 SNPs and 357,639 indels were obtained. Among the variant data, 98,833 variants caused nonsynonymous substitutions or otherwise altered the predicted amino acid sequence of protein-coding genes. We investigated the population structure of the WRC accessions using these genome-wide SNP data. We constructed a phylogenetic tree of the WRC based on a set of 2,315 representative SNPs selected to be in approximate linkage equilibrium (using the Snphylo pipeline; Lee et�al. 2014), and the WRC accessions were divided into three major groups, corresponding to japonica, indica and aus (Fig.�1A). Among these three groups, the indica cluster could be further divided into four subgroups (I-1, I-2, I-3 and I-4) and the aus cluster could be further divided into two subgroups (A-1 and A-2) based on the phylogenetic tree (Fig.�1A). Principal component analysis (PCA) using the whole SNP dataset also classified the WRC into three groups (Fig.�1B). The contribution of the first and second principal components was 22.6% and 14.2%, respectively. It was inferred that the optimum number of clusters (K) in this population using all SNPs is 3 based on the fastStructure analysis (Fig.�1C, Supplementary Table S1). These results revealed a clear separation of the WRC into three groups consistent with the classification using RFLP markers by Kojima et�al. (2005), and thus, the WRC represents a highly structured population. Compared with their RFLP-based classification in Kojima et�al. (2005), Lebed (WRC23) (indica in Kojima et�al. 2005) was reclassified into japonica and Calotoc (WRC22) and Basilanon (WRC44) (aus in Kojima et�al. 2005) were reclassified into the indica subgroup based on the WGS data (Fig.�1A). According to the fastStructure analysis, it is likely that there is some admixture in these accessions and, in the phylogenetic tree shown in Fig.�1A, these accessions are separated from the main branches in japonica and indica subgroups. Therefore, it is not surprising that there was a difference between the classifications based on the WGS and RFLP markers.
Fig. 1

Phylogenetic tree, PCA and fastStructure analysis of 69 WRC accessions. (A) Unrooted maximum likelihood tree based on 2,315 representative SNPs in approximate linkage equilibrium, called by mapping WRC resequencing data against the O. sativa ssp. japonica Nipponbare genome. The WRC was divided into japonica (blue), indica (orange) and aus (magenta). (B) PCA plots of genotype data based on whole-genome SNPs. (C) Population structure of the GWAS panel at K = 3.

Phylogenetic tree, PCA and fastStructure analysis of 69 WRC accessions. (A) Unrooted maximum likelihood tree based on 2,315 representative SNPs in approximate linkage equilibrium, called by mapping WRC resequencing data against the O. sativa ssp. japonica Nipponbare genome. The WRC was divided into japonica (blue), indica (orange) and aus (magenta). (B) PCA plots of genotype data based on whole-genome SNPs. (C) Population structure of the GWAS panel at K = 3. To compare the population structure of the WRC with publicly available data from the 3,000 Rice Genomes Project, we downloaded a whole-genome biallelic SNP set from IRRI Snpseek (https://snp-seek.irri.org/) and performed PCA using WRC data for the same SNP positions. A comparison of WRC groups with the rice population groups defined by Wang et�al. (2018) suggests that the WRC is an effective mini-core collection for rice, as much of the variation in the first two principal components can be captured by the WRC (Supplementary Fig. S1). A large phylogenetic tree comprising both WRC and 3K accessions can be accessed at https://itol.embl.de/tree/1502676182761580197097. The assignment of WRC accessions to population groups defined by Wang et�al. (2018) based on proximity to 3K genome accessions in the phylogenetic tree is shown in Supplementary Table S1.

Haplotype analysis of agronomically significant genes

To demonstrate the utility of the WRC genome sequence data, we examined the haplotypes of a series of agronomically important genes. We visualized WGS data of the WRC in the TASUKE multiple genome browser (Kumagai et�al. 2013) and classified haplotype groups of several genes related to seed traits and heading date. In grain color (Fig.�2B), a major pericarp-color gene Rc (Os07g0211500), which encodes a basic helix–loop–helix protein, has been reported (Furukawa et�al. 2006, Sweeney et�al. 2006). In 23 of the 69 accessions (12/16 aus, 9/33 indica and 2/20 japonica accessions), we detected a 14-base insertion in exon 6 of Rc (Fig.�2A), known to be a functional mutation (Furukawa et�al. 2006) that results in a frameshift mutation, while 20 of these 23 accessions had a nonwhite pericarp. The pericarp color of WRC25 (Muha), WRC26 (Jhona 2) and WRC42 (Local Basmati) was white, even though these accessions carried the 14-base insertion in the Rc gene. All these three accessions, as well as WRC33 (Surjamukhi) that had a light red pericarp, were categorized into aus and also carried a C → A mutation at position Cys 451. This mutation, resulting in a stop codon at amino acid 451 in Rc, is known as the Rc-s allele (Sweeney et al., 2007). The Rc-s allele is known to be specific to aus and results in white or light red pericarps (Sweeney et al., 2007), consistent with our results.
Fig. 2

Haplotype analysis for genes related to seed phenotypes. (A) Gene structure of and DNA sequence polymorphism in the Rc gene. (B) Seed color phenotype of WRC1 (Nipponbare) and WRC2 (Kasalath). (C) Gene structure of and DNA sequence polymorphism in the waxy gene. (D) Box plot showing seed amylose content for WRC accessions bearing Haplotype A or Haplotype B at the waxy gene. (E) Gene structure of and DNA polymorphism in the GS3 gene. (F) Box plot showing seed length for WRC accessions bearing Haplotype A or Haplotype B at the GS3 gene.

Haplotype analysis for genes related to seed phenotypes. (A) Gene structure of and DNA sequence polymorphism in the Rc gene. (B) Seed color phenotype of WRC1 (Nipponbare) and WRC2 (Kasalath). (C) Gene structure of and DNA sequence polymorphism in the waxy gene. (D) Box plot showing seed amylose content for WRC accessions bearing Haplotype A or Haplotype B at the waxy gene. (E) Gene structure of and DNA polymorphism in the GS3 gene. (F) Box plot showing seed length for WRC accessions bearing Haplotype A or Haplotype B at the GS3 gene. As for amylose content, the waxy (Wx) gene (Os06g0133000) encodes a granule‐bound starch synthase and controls the synthesis of amylose in endosperm (Wang et�al. 1995). We found a 23-bp insertion in exon 1 of the waxy gene, resulting in a frameshift in nine accessions with low amylose content (3/33 indica and 6/20 japonica accessions; Fig.�2C, D). This 23-bp insertion in waxy was completely correlated with the amylose content in WRC seeds (Fig.�2D) and has been described previously along with several other haplotypes at the waxy locus in wild and cultivated rice (Zhang et�al. 2019). We performed haplotype analysis of GS3 (Os03g0407400), which encodes a protein consisting of four domains and an N-terminal plant-specific organ size regulation (OSR) domain that is sufficient to negatively regulate grain size (Mao et�al. 2010). We observed two high-impact mutations in the GS3 sequence, and we first focused on an SNP that changes a Cys codon to a stop codon at amino acid 55 (Fig.�2E). WRC accessions carrying this haplotype B in GS3 had longer grains than haplotype A (Fig.�2F). The other high-impact mutation was seen in WRC34 (ARC 7291), which had a 4-bp deletion in exon 5 of GS3 and showed shorter grain length (5.0 mm, average: 6.9 mm) (Supplementary Table S1). Haplotype analysis for genes related to seed phenotypes indicated that there was functional diversity in well-known genes related to grain color, amylose content and grain length among the 69 WRC accessions. Heading date is one of the most important agronomical traits, and diversity of heading date has contributed to the development of rice cultivation in a wider range of latitudes (Khush 1997). As major heading date QTLs, Hd1 (Yano et�al. 2000), Hd2/OsPRR37 (Koo et�al. 2013, Gao et�al. 2014), Hd6 (Ogiso et�al. 2010), Hd17/OsELF3-1 (Matsubara et�al. 2012), RFT1 (Komiya et�al. 2008), Ghd7 (Xue et�al. 2008) and DTH8 (Wei et�al. 2010) have been identified (Itoh et�al. 2018). We used the TASUKE system to explore haplotypes of heading date genes in the WRC. Most of the reported alleles were detected in the WRC, with some exceptions. The distribution of alleles generally reflected the origin and/or cultivar groups of the accessions. Among the haplotypes of Hd1, a 2-bp deletion in the hd1 null alleles was widely distributed throughout the japonica, indica and aus groups (Fig.�3, Table�1). This 2-bp deletion, as well as other frameshift mutations, and an SNP that changes an Arg residue to a stop codon at amino acid 358 have been previously identified as functional mutations in Hd1 (Yano et�al. 2000, Takahashi et�al. 2009). On the other hand, the SNP that changes Arg358 to a stop codon was only distributed in the japonica accessions WRC45 (Ma sho), WRC46 (Khao Nok) and WRC48 (Khau Mac Kho). We also detected a 1-bp deletion with a frameshift in exon 1 of Hd1 in four accessions (Table�1). All these four accessions (WRC20, WRC22, WRC24 and WRC44) originated from the Philippines and were categorized into a small subgroup I-4 in the indica group (Fig.�1A, Table�1). A 4-bp deletion in the second exon of Hd1 was observed in WRC7 (Davao1), WRC18 (Qingyu), WRC21 (Shwe Nang Gyi), WRC57 (Milyand 23) and WRC98 (Deejiaohualuo), which belong to the indica group (Fig.�3, Table�1). As minor alleles, only WRC100 (Vandaran) has a 2-bp insertion in exon 2 of Hd1 (Fig.�3, Table�1).
Fig. 3

Screenshot of Os06g0275000 (Hd1) genotypes in WRC accessions using TASUKE system. The likely effects of sequence variation detected in NGS data can be displayed in the TASUKE system. The effects on annotated genes are calculated by SnpEff, which classes their impact as high, moderate, low and modifier (Cingolani et�al. 2012) represented in TASUKE as red, orange, yellow and blue, respectively. High impact refers to, e.g. truncations, large indels or loss of stop codons. Moderate impact refers to other nonsynonymous coding region changes. Low refers to synonymous changes. Modifier refers to changes in noncoding genic regions. NGS: next-generation sequencing.

Table 1

Distribution of functional mutations in flowering-time genes in WRC accessions

QTLsIndel/SNPsSubstitutionReferenceWRC accessions
Hd11-bp deletionTyr191fsWRC20, 22, 24, 44
2-bp deletionPhe279fs Yano et al. (2000)WRC2, 4–6, 11, 13, 14, 17, 23, 25, 28–38, 40–42, 47, 49, 50, 55, 64, 99
2-bp insertionAsp294fsWRC100
4-bp deletionLys352fsWRC7, 18, 21, 27, 57, 98
C → TArg358a Takahashi et�al. (2009) WRC45, 46, 48
Hd6A → T a 146LysTakahashi et al. (2001)Except for WRC1
Ghd7T → Gsplice_acceptorWRC15, 100
RFT1G → AGlu105Lys Ogiso-Tanaka et�al. (2013) WRC3, 7, 13, 17, 18, 20, 58, 59, 60, 62–65, 98–100
Hd28-bp deletionLys505fsWRC7, 9, 10, 16–18, 98, 99
T → CTyr704His Koo et�al. (2013) WRC66
C → TGln705a Koo et�al. (2013) WRC2, 31, 38
Hd17A → TLeu132aWRC19
A → GLeu558Ser Matsubara et�al. (2012) Except for WRC1, 21, 39, 43, 57
DTH819-bp deletionAla32fs Fujino et al. (2013)WRC43
1-bp deletionLys108fsWRC7, 9, 21, 98
8-bp deletionGlu151fsWRC17, 99
1,118-bp deletionLarge deletion Hori et al. (2015) WRC3, 10, 19

We surveyed mutations in flowering-time genes in the WRC using the TASUKE genome browser. Newly identified mutations found in this study are shown in blue text.

Stop codon.

fs: frameshift.

Screenshot of Os06g0275000 (Hd1) genotypes in WRC accessions using TASUKE system. The likely effects of sequence variation detected in NGS data can be displayed in the TASUKE system. The effects on annotated genes are calculated by SnpEff, which classes their impact as high, moderate, low and modifier (Cingolani et�al. 2012) represented in TASUKE as red, orange, yellow and blue, respectively. High impact refers to, e.g. truncations, large indels or loss of stop codons. Moderate impact refers to other nonsynonymous coding region changes. Low refers to synonymous changes. Modifier refers to changes in noncoding genic regions. NGS: next-generation sequencing. Distribution of functional mutations in flowering-time genes in WRC accessions We surveyed mutations in flowering-time genes in the WRC using the TASUKE genome browser. Newly identified mutations found in this study are shown in blue text. Stop codon. fs: frameshift. Next, we examined the haplotypes of other major QTLs for heading date, Hd2/OsPRR37, Hd6, Hd17/OsELF3-1, RFT1, Ghd7 and DTH8 in the WRC accessions (Table�1, Supplementary Fig. S2). In Hd2, an 8-bp deletion was observed in the seventh exon of eight accessions classified into the indica group (Table�1, Supplementary Fig. S2). All accessions with this 8-bp deletion in Hd2, except for WRC16, were classified into a small subgroup (I-2) in indica (Fig.�1A, Table�1). WRC2 (Kasalath), WRC31 (Shoni) and WRC38 (ARC 11094) in the aus A-1 subgroup carry an SNP that changes a Gln to a stop codon at amino acid 705. Only WRC66 (Bingala) in indica has a nonfunctional variant that changes Tyr to His at amino acid 704 in the Hd2 CCT domain (Koo et�al. 2013). Functional mutations in Hd2 were not observed in japonica accessions in the WRC. In Hd6, a nonsynonymous substitution at amino acid 146 resulting in a premature stop codon was only observed in Nipponbare among the WRC population (Table�1). Matsubara et�al. (2012) reported that a substitution from Leu to Ser at amino acid 558 of Hd17 was a functional mutation. Except for five accessions, this substitution was observed in all members of the WRC population, but there was no correlation of this allele with the heading date (Table�1, Supplementary Table S1). In RFT1, 16 indica accessions have a functional mutation that changes Glu to Lys at amino acid 105 (Table�1). Null mutations in Ghd7 and DTH8 cause extremely early heading date (Itoh et�al. 2018). In Ghd7, previously reported functional mutations (Xue et�al. 2008) were not detected among WRC accessions, but WRC15 (Co 13) and WRC100 (Vandaran) carried an SNP in the splicing acceptor region (Table�1). WRC3 (Bei Khe), WRC10 (Shuu Sou Shu) and WRC19 (Deng Pao Zhai) have a 1,118-bp deletion (Hori et al., 2015), and WRC43 has a 19-bp deletion in the DTH8 coding sequence, but only WRC10 showed an early heading date phenotype (Table�1, Supplementary Table S1). In DTH8, WRC17 (Keiboba) and WRC99 (Hong Cheuh Zai) have an 8-bp deletion and WRC7 (Davao1), WRC9 (Ryo Suisan Koumai), WRC21 (Shwe Nang Gyi) and WRC98 (Deejiaohualuo) have a 1-bp deletion, which causes a frameshift. Three of these five accessions originate from China and show an early heading date phenotype (101–111 d, mean of WRC: 122 d, Supplementary Table S1). These 8- and 1-bp deletions might be new functional mutations in DTH8 that contribute to an early-flowering phenotype in Chinese accessions. Using the TASUKE system, we detected several high-impact indels and SNPs in heading date-related genes. Almost all mutations in these seven genes related to heading date were observed in particular groups (Table�1). Only a 2-bp deletion in Hd1 was widely distributed among the three subgroups in WRC (Supplementary Fig. S1). These results indicate that indels and SNPs with high impact in heading date genes occurred after subgroup differentiation, except for the 2-bp deletion in Hd1. In addition, large deletions, such as a 1,118-bp deletion in DTH8, can also be detected by the TASUKE system (Table�1). Because genome-wide SNP sets generally focus on biallelic SNPs and ignore long indels, such long deletions and multi-allelic SNPs may be overlooked, but they can be visualized in parallel for different accessions using the TASUKE system. Thus, TASUKE with the WRC accessions is a useful tool for visualizing and analyzing haplotype variation among diverse rice germplasm resources.

GWAS with the WRC

One of the most important aims in maintaining genetic resources in genebanks is to use them as materials for crop improvement in breeding programs. To analyze the natural allelic variation associated with agronomic traits using diverse populations, GWAS is a powerful and efficient tool. Therefore, we evaluated the WRC as a GWAS population for agriculturally important traits. We tried GWAS for grain (pericarp) color as a qualitative trait, amylose content as a bimodal quantitative trait, grain length as a quantitative trait controlled by a few QTLs and heading date as an example of a quantitative trait controlled by a complicated gene network (Figs.�4, 5).
Fig. 4

Phenotypic diversity of WRC accessions. (A) Histogram of grain color coded as numeric values: 1 for white-colored accessions and 2 for nonwhite color accessions including red or purple grains. (B) Histogram of seed amylose content (mass %). (C) Histogram of grain length (mm). (D) Histogram of heading date (days after sowing).

Phenotypic diversity of WRC accessions. (A) Histogram of grain color coded as numeric values: 1 for white-colored accessions and 2 for nonwhite color accessions including red or purple grains. (B) Histogram of seed amylose content (mass %). (C) Histogram of grain length (mm). (D) Histogram of heading date (days after sowing). GWAS for phenotypes related to agronomical traits and identification of candidate genes for each peak. (A) Manhattan plot for grain color GWAS using a linear mixed model. (B) Manhattan plot for amylose content GWAS using a linear mixed model. (C) Manhattan plot for seed length GWAS using a linear mixed model. Arrows indicate Rc, waxy and GS3 loci. Pink lines represent a P-value threshold corresponding to an false discovery rate of 0.05 using the Benjamini and Hochberg correction. When considering grain color as a binary phenotype (white or not white), and using two methods, mixed linear model (MLM) and FarmCPU (Liu et�al. 2016), a significant peak associated with grain color was detected on the short arm of chromosome 7 using both methods (Fig.�5A, Supplementary Fig. S3). For the grain color phenotype data, we coded the observation data as a numeric value of 1 for white-colored accessions and 2 for nonwhite color accessions including red or purple grains (Fig.�4A). The detected peak was located close to a major pericarp-color gene Rc (Os07g0211500) (Furukawa et�al. 2006, Sweeney et�al. 2006). These results indicated that our GWAS system with WRC was suitable for detecting genes associated with binary traits, such as grain color.
Fig. 5

GWAS for phenotypes related to agronomical traits and identification of candidate genes for each peak. (A) Manhattan plot for grain color GWAS using a linear mixed model. (B) Manhattan plot for amylose content GWAS using a linear mixed model. (C) Manhattan plot for seed length GWAS using a linear mixed model. Arrows indicate Rc, waxy and GS3 loci. Pink lines represent a P-value threshold corresponding to an false discovery rate of 0.05 using the Benjamini and Hochberg correction.

Next, we performed GWAS for seed amylose content using the WRC population. The distribution of seed amylose content was bimodal (Fig.�4B). We used the same GWAS methods as before, and significant peaks associated with amylose content were detected on chromosome 6 with both methods (Fig.�5B, Supplementary Fig. S4). These peaks corresponded to a known gene responsible for amylose content, waxy (Os06g0133000) (Wang et�al. 1995). The identification of the waxy gene indicated that GWAS using WGS of WRC accessions could also be used to identify genes associated with traits showing a bimodal distribution in the study population. WRC accessions exhibited a normal distribution for grain length (Fig.�4C), and a clear peak for grain length was observed on chromosome 3 (Fig.�5C, Supplementary Fig. S5) using the MLM and FarmCPU methods. The peak mapped close to GS3 (Os03g0407400), which is known to control the grain length. These mutations in Rc, waxy and GS3 associated with seed traits were previously reported by Huang et�al. (2012) in a GWAS with 373 indica accessions and by Wang et al. (2017) in a GWAS with 203 samples from the United States Department of Agriculture Rice Mini-Core Collection (Agrama et al., 2009). The identification of functional variants consistent with previous reports suggested that our compact WRC GWAS population comprising only 69 accessions could match the performance of larger rice core collections. Finally, we performed GWAS for heading date, which is controlled by a gene network. Significant peaks exceeding a threshold [P < 0.05 with Bonferroni correction for 3,162,968 variants; −log10 (Pcorr) > 7.8] were not detected using the MLM or FarmCPU methods (Supplementary Fig. S6). These results implied that the WRC population has limitations for the detection of associations with traits controlled by many QTLs, such as heading date. Because 11 accessions of the WRC cannot flower in Japanese paddy fields, we excluded these accessions from GWAS for heading date (Supplementary Fig. S5). To investigate the mechanism of the nonflowering phenotype in these accessions, we treated the heading date as a binary trait (Supplementary Table S1). We classified the WRC population as flowering and nonflowering accessions in Japan and coded these data with a numeric value of 1 for flowering accessions and 2 for nonflowering accessions. In GWAS, we detected a significant peak for this numeric data on chromosome 6 using both the MLM and FarmCPU methods and flowering genes were not reported in regions close to this peak (Supplementary Fig. S7). It is possible that new genes located in this region influence flowering time in high latitude areas, such as Japan.

Discussion

In this study, we reevaluated WRC accessions using high-resolution WGS data. There is a strong demand to publish the WGS data of the WRC because it is a useful and convenient population for examining natural variation in gene sequences and phenotypes (Sugimoto et�al. 2010, Uraguchi and Fujiwara 2013). In addition to the classification of the WRC using WGS data, we performed haplotype analysis of genes in the WRC and developed a GWAS pipeline using the WRC population that could detect candidate genes associated with agronomical traits (Fig.�5). To examine the candidate genes of several traits in detail and perform reverse genetics, we used the TASUKE system to visualize the whole-genome sequence of the WRC for the classification of haplotypes of significant genes among the 69 WRC accessions (Fig.�3, Supplementary Fig. S2). In our analysis, the WRC was divided into three groups based on their whole-genome sequence variants, broadly consistent with the previous classification using RFLP markers (Kojima et�al. 2005). Rice accessions have been previously classified into five groups, indica, aus, temperate japonica, tropical japonica and aromatic using single sequence repeat markers (Garris et al., 2005). However, temperate and tropical japonica were not clearly separated in our analysis using whole-genome sequence (Fig.�1) and it is convenient for analysis to use three main groups for this core collection. Four WRC accessions, WRC20, 22, 24 and 44, originating from the Philippines were classified into the same subgroup (I-4) in the indica group. A small subgroup in aus (A-2) consisted of five accessions originating from Nepal (WRC4, WRC27, WRC29 and WRC30) and Bhutan (WRC28) (Fig.�1A, Supplementary Table S1). In addition, seven of the nine accessions in a small indica subgroup (I-2) were from China or Taiwan (Supplementary Table S1). These results indicated that the classification of WRC using WGS accurately reflects the geographical information of their origin. Large numbers of markers obtained from WGS data may have detected incidental mutations that occur during geographical speciation and made an accurate classification of WRC. The combination of WGS data and passport data suggests genetic variations in rice cultivar groups. There were several accessions with an early-flowering phenotype in a small indica subgroup (I-2), including several Chinese accessions (Supplementary Table S1). In South China, double cropping of rice is more popular as it increases the rice production (Peng 2014). Seven accessions from South China and Taiwan in the I-2 group have an 8-bp deletion in Hd2 (Table�1) and show relatively early flowering (101–117 d, mean of WRC:122 d, Supplementary Table S1). Hd2 is known as a major determinant of photosensitivity (Gao et�al. 2014); therefore, accessions with early flowering and low photosensitivity associated with the 8-bp deletion in Hd2 can be planted at any time of year. These accessions might have been selected with suitable flowering traits for double-cropping rice planting in South China. Among the WRC accessions, there are 11 accessions with a nonflowering phenotype in our experimental field. Eight of these 11 accessions were classified into the largest subgroup in indica (I-1, Fig.�1A). Interestingly, these 11 accessions did not carry any high impact or functional nucleotide polymorphism in the known heading date genes that we examined in this report (Table�1). This result implies that the nonflowering phenotype in WRC accessions in Japan may be regulated by uncharacterized genes. Because the WRC is a small population for GWAS and contains three groups with highly differentiated accessions, false positives caused by a strong population structure in the panel are a possibility. Therefore, in addition to MLM, we used the statistically robust algorithm, FarmCPU (Liu et�al. 2016), to perform GWAS for each trait. We successfully identified Rc, waxy and GS3 genes as genes associated with grain color, amylose content and grain length, respectively (Fig.�5). Of these three traits for which we successfully identified associated gene loci, amylose content and grain color did not exhibit normally distributed phenotypes (Fig.�4). Grain color was measured as a qualitative trait, such as the row type or grain cover in barley, and amylose content was similarly bimodally distributed. Such traits are usually controlled by a small number of genes and are easier to detect in association studies (Milner et al. 2019). Although grain length in the WRC had an approximately normal distribution (Fig.�4), grain size variation is also often controlled by a few major QTLs (Fan et�al. 2006). In conclusion, if there are strong QTLs associated with traits and the number of related QTLs is relatively small, the WRC can be an effective population for detecting causal genes by GWAS. In the case of heading date, we did not detect any significant peaks correlating with well-known heading date genes (Supplementary Fig. S6). The heading date is regulated by a large number of QTLs including several kinds of haplotypes in each locus. Therefore, the small, structured WRC population is likely underpowered for the detection of QTLs associated with complex traits, such as heading date. Using the TASUKE system, we focused on seven heading date genes reported as major QTLs for heading date (Itoh et�al. 2018) and identified several high-impact SNPs and indels, such as the introduction of premature stop codons. However, most of these alleles were found in fewer than three accessions in the WRC (Table�1). Because nucleotide polymorphisms with MAF <0.05 among the 69 accessions were removed from the variant dataset, these rare SNPs were not used in the GWAS procedure. Furthermore, functional mutations in the heading date tended to coincide with population structure. This might be a further reason that known QTLs were not detected in the GWAS for heading date. Recent reductions in sequencing costs mean that genomic characterization is no longer the main barrier to the exploitation of rice germplasm resources; for most researchers, phenotypic characterization is the most time consuming and costly step. If a GWAS population consists of a large number of accessions, it is difficult to use that population for phenotyping of traits, which require much labor, such as yields. The WRC includes only 69 accessions and is a useful set for the deep study of the natural variation in agronomical traits. As we demonstrated in GWAS for seed phenotypes (Fig.�5), the WRC is a compact population and is sufficient to detect the candidate genes reported in previous works using a larger number of accessions (Huang et�al. 2012, Wang et al. 2017). The viability of the WRC for GWAS is meaningful for researchers who have already used and will use the WRC as a phenotyping population. After the detection of associated loci by GWAS, visualization of whole-genome variant data of WRC using TASUKE also helps them to perform an intuitive search for candidate genes. However, the NARO Genebank maintains >37,000 rice accessions and not all of the diversity can be represented in a mini-core collection. By selectively generating new short-read sequencing data, expanding the number of accessions with high coverage, whole-genome resequence data informed by the genome data from each subgroup of the WRC, we aim to provide a small number of focused populations for GWAS studies based on NARO Genebank materials. The WRC collection can then be used to examine the phenotypic distribution on a trait-by-trait basis, to select an appropriate population for association studies and the identification of unique, agronomically important genes (Fig.�6). Other large collections of rice germplasm are also available, such as the Rice 3K genomes collection (Wang et�al. 2018), and we provide here information about the relationship between the WRC and these accessions (Supplementary Table S1). There are also different analysis tools available, such as mbkbase (Peng et�al. 2020). However, the WRC is a well-known and widely distributed collection and the TASUKE system is a well-featured yet intuitive tool for researchers to interact with these rice genomic data and to make full use of the newly available genomic information.
Fig. 6

Flowchart of two-step GWAS using core collections selected from 37,000 rice accessions in NARO Genebank. In the first step, users perform phenotyping of WRC. As a second step, users select the population(s) for which phenotypic diversity was observed in the WRC. For example, if aus accessions in the WRC show phenotypic diversity, they will choose the expanded aus core collection for further phenotyping and GWAS.

Flowchart of two-step GWAS using core collections selected from 37,000 rice accessions in NARO Genebank. In the first step, users perform phenotyping of WRC. As a second step, users select the population(s) for which phenotypic diversity was observed in the WRC. For example, if aus accessions in the WRC show phenotypic diversity, they will choose the expanded aus core collection for further phenotyping and GWAS.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials and WGS

We used WRC accessions maintained at the NARO Genebank (Supplementary Table S1). Total DNA was extracted from leaves of each variety using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). The DNA libraries were sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2000, Genome Analyzer IIx or HiSeq X instruments (Illumina Co., Ltd.), and paired-end reads were obtained. All reads were mapped against Os-Nipponbare-Reference-IRGSP-1.0 (Kawahara et�al. 2013) pseudomolecules using bwa mem (Li and Durbin 2009), and duplicates were removed using picard MarkDuplicates (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/).

Variant calling

Variants were called essentially following the GATK Best Practices for germline SNP/Indel discovery (Auwera et al. 2013). Variants were first called on a by-sample basis using GATK HaplotypeCaller, and then variants were consolidated in a joint calling step with GenotypeGVCFs (Poplin et�al. 2018). GATK version 4.0.11.0 was employed for all steps. Variants were then filtered using bcftools view (Li 2011) with the parameters '-m2 -M2 -g hom - -output-type z - -exclude-uncalled -e “MAF < 0.05 ‖ N_MISSING > 0 ‖ QD < 5.0 ‖ FS > 50.0 ‖ SOR > 3.0 ‖ MQ < 50.0 ‖ MQRankSum < −2.5 ‖ ReadPosRankSum < −1.0 ‖ ReadPosRankSum > 3.5”', resulting in a set of variants where no position had missing data or an MAF of <0.05. This variant dataset contained 2,805,329 SNPs and 357,639 indels. All nucleotide polymorphisms were categorized for their potential effects using SnpEff 4.3t (Cingolani et�al. 2012) with the Oryza_sativa database.

Phylogenetic tree and population structure

The Snphylo pipeline (Lee et�al. 2014) was used to create a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on the representative genomic SNPs selected to be in approximate linkage equilibrium. The pipeline was employed using default parameters and 100 bootstrap replicates to create the bootstrapped maximum likelihood tree, which was based on 2,315 variants in approximate linkage equilibrium. Population structure analysis was conducted using the fastStructure software (Raj et�al. 2014) using the Structure_threader wrapper script for parallel implementation (Pina‐Martins et al. 2017). The input for fastStucture was the 2,805,329 SNPs and 357,639 indels variant dataset described in the Variant calling. PCA was performed using the R package SNPRelate (Zheng et�al. 2012). The input data were 2,805,329 SNPs from the same dataset as above. Principal components were calculated with the snpgdsPCA function. To compare WRC accessions with the 3K genomes collection, we downloaded a set of 29 million biallelic SNPs with SnpEff annotation from IRRI Snpseek (https://s3.amazonaws.com/3kricegenome/snpseek-dl/NB_bialSNP_pseudo_canonical_ALL.vcf.gz) and intersected with SNPs called for the WRC using bcftools, excluding sites missing from the WRC data, resulting in a dataset of 708,540 SNPs. PCA was performed as above. A phylogenetic tree from 1,725 of these SNPs in approximate linkage equilibrium was constructed using FastTree2 (Price et al. 2010).

Genome-wide association studies

For GWAS, we used MLM models (Yu et�al. 2006) and also employed the FarmCPU algorithm (Liu et�al. 2016). All association studies were performed using R (R Core Team 2018) using modified scripts from the MVP (https://rdrr.io/github/XiaoleiLiuBio/MVP/), GAPIT (Lipka et�al. 2012) and GENESIS (Gogarten et al. 2019) packages. FarmCPU was used in the parallel implementation by Kusmec and Schnable (2018). Visualization used scripts from MVP, GAPIT and the R packages qqman (Turner 2018) and GWASTools (Gogarten et al., 2012).

Visualization of genotypes using TASUKE

Variants were genotyped by sample up to the GATK HaplotypeCaller (Poplin et�al. 2018) step in the Variant calling and filtered using bcftools (Li 2011) with the condition -e ‘QD < 5.0 ‖ FS > 50.0 ‖ SOR > 3.0 ‖ MQ < 50.0 ‖ MQRankSum < −2.5 ‖ ReadPosRankSum < −1.0 ‖ ReadPosRankSum > 3.5’. Variants for each accession were displayed using the TASUKE genome browser (Kumagai et�al. 2013). TASUKE is a web browser-based visualization system for whole-genome variant data. The input files of WRC for TASUKE were created using a custom data analysis pipeline, using the same mapping and variant calls as for the GWAS variant dataset, but without filtering for MAF or allele number. These datasets are accessible at https://ricegenome-corecollection.dna.affrc.go.jp, and users can choose a specific region and/or gene in which they are interested. Click here for additional data file.
  56 in total

1.  A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness.

Authors:  Jianming Yu; Gael Pressoir; William H Briggs; Irie Vroh Bi; Masanori Yamasaki; John F Doebley; Michael D McMullen; Brandon S Gaut; Dahlia M Nielsen; James B Holland; Stephen Kresovich; Edward S Buckler
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2005-12-25       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice.

Authors:  Weiya Xue; Yongzhong Xing; Xiaoyu Weng; Yu Zhao; Weijiang Tang; Lei Wang; Hongju Zhou; Sibin Yu; Caiguo Xu; Xianghua Li; Qifa Zhang
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-05-04       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 3.  From association to prediction: statistical methods for the dissection and selection of complex traits in plants.

Authors:  Alexander E Lipka; Catherine B Kandianis; Matthew E Hudson; Jianming Yu; Jenny Drnevich; Peter J Bradbury; Michael A Gore
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 7.834

4.  Origin, dispersal, cultivation and variation of rice.

Authors:  G S Khush
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.076

5.  Wxlv, the Ancestral Allele of Rice Waxy Gene.

Authors:  Changquan Zhang; Jihui Zhu; Shengjie Chen; Xiaolei Fan; Qianfeng Li; Yan Lu; Min Wang; Hengxiu Yu; Chuandeng Yi; Shuzhu Tang; Minghong Gu; Qiaoquan Liu
Journal:  Mol Plant       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 13.164

6.  Natural variation in Hd17, a homolog of Arabidopsis ELF3 that is involved in rice photoperiodic flowering.

Authors:  Kazuki Matsubara; Eri Ogiso-Tanaka; Kiyosumi Hori; Kaworu Ebana; Tsuyu Ando; Masahiro Yano
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 4.927

7.  The amylose content in rice endosperm is related to the post-transcriptional regulation of the waxy gene.

Authors:  Z Y Wang; F Q Zheng; G Z Shen; J P Gao; D P Snustad; M G Li; J L Zhang; M M Hong
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.417

8.  FarmCPUpp: Efficient large-scale genomewide association studies.

Authors:  Aaron Kusmec; Patrick S Schnable
Journal:  Plant Direct       Date:  2018-04-10

9.  Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Genomic variation in 3,010 diverse accessions of Asian cultivated rice.

Authors:  Wensheng Wang; Ramil Mauleon; Zhiqiang Hu; Dmytro Chebotarov; Shuaishuai Tai; Zhichao Wu; Min Li; Tianqing Zheng; Roven Rommel Fuentes; Fan Zhang; Locedie Mansueto; Dario Copetti; Millicent Sanciangco; Kevin Christian Palis; Jianlong Xu; Chen Sun; Binying Fu; Hongliang Zhang; Yongming Gao; Xiuqin Zhao; Fei Shen; Xiao Cui; Hong Yu; Zichao Li; Miaolin Chen; Jeffrey Detras; Yongli Zhou; Xinyuan Zhang; Yue Zhao; Dave Kudrna; Chunchao Wang; Rui Li; Ben Jia; Jinyuan Lu; Xianchang He; Zhaotong Dong; Jiabao Xu; Yanhong Li; Miao Wang; Jianxin Shi; Jing Li; Dabing Zhang; Seunghee Lee; Wushu Hu; Alexander Poliakov; Inna Dubchak; Victor Jun Ulat; Frances Nikki Borja; John Robert Mendoza; Jauhar Ali; Jing Li; Qiang Gao; Yongchao Niu; Zhen Yue; Ma Elizabeth B Naredo; Jayson Talag; Xueqiang Wang; Jinjie Li; Xiaodong Fang; Ye Yin; Jean-Christophe Glaszmann; Jianwei Zhang; Jiayang Li; Ruaraidh Sackville Hamilton; Rod A Wing; Jue Ruan; Gengyun Zhang; Chaochun Wei; Nickolai Alexandrov; Kenneth L McNally; Zhikang Li; Hei Leung
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  10 in total

1.  Investigation of the genetic diversity of a core collection of japanese rice landraces (JRC) using whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  N Tanaka; M Shenton; Y Kawahara; M Kumagai; H Sakai; H Kanamori; J Yonemaru; S Fukuoka; K Sugimoto; M Ishimoto; J Wu; K Ebana
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.927

2.  A stepwise route to domesticate rice by controlling seed shattering and panicle shape.

Authors:  Ryo Ishikawa; Cristina Cobo Castillo; Than Myint Htun; Koji Numaguchi; Kazuya Inoue; Yumi Oka; Miki Ogasawara; Shohei Sugiyama; Natsumi Takama; Chhourn Orn; Chizuru Inoue; Ken-Ichi Nonomura; Robin Allaby; Dorian Q Fuller; Takashige Ishii
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  Exploration of Life-Course Factors Influencing Phenotypic Outcomes in Crops.

Authors:  Keiichi Mochida; Alexander E Lipka; Takashi Hirayama
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.927

Review 4.  Genomic resources in plant breeding for sustainable agriculture.

Authors:  Mahendar Thudi; Ramesh Palakurthi; James C Schnable; Annapurna Chitikineni; Susanne Dreisigacker; Emma Mace; Rakesh K Srivastava; C Tara Satyavathi; Damaris Odeny; Vijay K Tiwari; Hon-Ming Lam; Yan Bin Hong; Vikas K Singh; Guowei Li; Yunbi Xu; Xiaoping Chen; Sanjay Kaila; Henry Nguyen; Sobhana Sivasankar; Scott A Jackson; Timothy J Close; Wan Shubo; Rajeev K Varshney
Journal:  J Plant Physiol       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 3.549

5.  Investigation of the Genetic Diversity of a Rice Core Collection of Japanese Landraces using Whole-Genome Sequencing.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Tanaka; Matthew Shenton; Yoshihiro Kawahara; Masahiko Kumagai; Hiroaki Sakai; Hiroyuki Kanamori; Jun-Ichi Yonemaru; Shinichi Fukuoka; Kazuhiko Sugimoto; Masao Ishimoto; Jianzhong Wu; Kaworu Ebana
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.927

6.  Defense mechanisms involving secondary metabolism in the grass family.

Authors:  Atsushi Ishihara
Journal:  J Pestic Sci       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 2.529

7.  Whole-genome resequencing of Coffea arabica L. (Rubiaceae) genotypes identify SNP and unravels distinct groups showing a strong geographical pattern.

Authors:  Yeshitila Mekbib; Kassahun Tesfaye; Xiang Dong; Josphat K Saina; Guang-Wan Hu; Qing-Feng Wang
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 4.215

Review 8.  Pangenomes as a Resource to Accelerate Breeding of Under-Utilised Crop Species.

Authors:  Cassandria Geraldine Tay Fernandez; Benjamin John Nestor; Monica Furaste Danilevicz; Mitchell Gill; Jakob Petereit; Philipp Emanuel Bayer; Patrick Michael Finnegan; Jacqueline Batley; David Edwards
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Nutritional and genetic variation in a core set of Ethiopian Tef (Eragrostis tef) varieties.

Authors:  Nelzo C Ereful; Huw Jones; Nick Fradgley; Lesley Boyd; Hirut Assaye Cherie; Matthew J Milner
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 5.260

10.  Genetic diversity of wild rice accessions (Oryza rufipogon Griff.) in Guangdong and Hainan Provinces, China, and construction of a wild rice core collection.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Dajian Pan; Zhilan Fan; Hang Yu; Liqun Jiang; Shuwei Lv; Bingrui Sun; Wenfeng Chen; Xingxue Mao; Qing Liu; Chen Li
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 6.627

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.