Literature DB >> 3210050

Influence of magnetic resonance imaging on somatosensory and brain-stem auditory evoked potentials in man.

G Niemann1, G Schroth, U Klose, U W Buettner.   

Abstract

There is still a need to prove that even static magnetic fields up to 1.5 T used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are biologically safe and harmless for humans. Recordings of median and ulnar nerves and brain-stem auditory evoked potentials in 20 patients were completed prior to and after MRI investigation of the central nervous system. Neither the somatosensory nor the auditory evoked potentials exhibited any significant change of latencies, interpeak latencies or amplitudes. Since these electrophysiological parameters are highly dependent on the quality of nerve conduction and integrity of information processing in various nuclei, it may be assumed that MRI causes no lasting changes in either respect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3210050     DOI: 10.1007/bf00314248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  10 in total

1.  [Magnetic resonance tomography and safety. Electroencephalographic and neuropsychologic findings before and after MR studies of the brain].

Authors:  M Bartels; K Mann; M Matejcek; M Puttkammer; G Schroth
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1986-10

2.  [Recommendations for study method in using evoked potentials in routine diagnosis].

Authors:  W Hacke; M Stöhr; H C Diener; U Büttner
Journal:  EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb       Date:  1985-09

3.  Cognitive evaluation following NMR imaging of the brain.

Authors:  J A Besson; E I Foreman; L M Eastwood; F W Smith; G W Ashcroft
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Magnetic field induced temperature change in mice.

Authors:  D Sperber; R Oldenbourg; K Dransfeld
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1984-02

5.  Revised guidance on acceptable limits of exposure during nuclear magnetic resonance clinical imaging.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) in vivo studies: known thresholds for health effects.

Authors:  T F Budinger
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 7.  Nuclear magnetic resonance technology for medical studies.

Authors:  T F Budinger; P C Lauterbur
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-10-19       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Thresholds for biological effects of time-varying magnetic fields.

Authors:  D McRobbie; M A Foster
Journal:  Clin Phys Physiol Meas       Date:  1984-05

9.  Brainstem auditory evoked potential abnormalities in vascular malformations of the posterior fossa.

Authors:  U W Buettner; M Stöhr; E Koletzki
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  On the thermoregulatory consequences of NMR imaging.

Authors:  E R Adair; L G Berglund
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.546

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.