Literature DB >> 32100175

Age progression from vicenarians (20-29 year) to nonagenarians (90-99 year) among a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PopPk-PD) covariate analysis of propofol-bispectral index (BIS) electroencephalography.

Ashraf A Dahaba1, Zhaoyang Xiao2,3, Xiaoling Zhu4, Hailong Dong4, Lize Xiong4, Peter Rehak5, Sieglinde Zelzer6, Kun Wang7, Gilbert Reibnegger8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling has made an enormous contribution to intravenous anesthesia. Because of their altered physiological, pharmacological and pathological aspects, titrating general anesthesia in the elderly is a challenging task.
METHODS: Eighty patients were consecutively enrolled divided by decades from vicenarians (20-29 year) to nonagenarians (90-99 year) into eight groups. Using target controlled infusion (TCI) and electroencephalographic (EEG)-derived bispectral index (BIS) we set propofol plasma concentration (Cp) to gradually reach 3.5 μg mL-1 over 3.5-min. In each patient, we constructed a PK/PD model and conducted a population PK/PD (PopPK-PD) covariate analysis.
RESULTS: Age was significant covariate for baseline BIS effect (E0), inhibitory propofol concentration at 50% BIS decline (IC50) and maximum BIS decline (Emax). First-order rate constant Ke0 of 0.47 min-1 in vicenarians (20-29 year) gradually increased with age-progression to 1.85 min-1 in nonagenarians (90-99 year). Simulation modelling showed that clinically recommended Cp of 3.5 μg mL-1 for 20-29 year BIS 50 should be reduced to 3.0 for 30-49 year, 2.5 for 50-69 year and 2.0 for 80-89 year.
CONCLUSION: We quantified and graded EEG-BIS age-progression among different age groups divided by decades. We demonstrated deeper BIS values with decades' age progression. Our data has important implications for propofol dosing. The practical information for physicians in their daily clinical practice is using propofol Cp of 3.5 μg mL-1 might not yield BIS value of 50 in elderly patients. Our simulations showed that the recommended regimen of Cp 3.5 μg mL-1 for 20-29 year should be gradually decreased to 2.0 μg mL-1 for 80-89 year. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBERS: European Community Clinical Trials Database EudraCT (http://eudract.emea.eu) initial trial registration number: 2011-002847-81, and subsequently registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov; trial registration number: NCT02585284. Xijing Hospital of Fourth Military Medical University ethics committee approval number 20110707-4.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age; Bispectral index; Diagnostic accuracy; Electroencephalography; Pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic; Statistical model

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32100175     DOI: 10.1007/s10928-020-09678-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.745


  47 in total

1.  Low baseline Bispectral Index of the electroencephalogram in patients with dementia.

Authors:  Maurizio Renna; Jonathan Handy; Ajit Shah
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Validity and reliability of the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale: study with intravenous midazolam.

Authors:  D A Chernik; D Gillings; H Laine; J Hendler; J M Silver; A B Davidson; E M Schwam; J L Siegel
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.153

3.  Geographic differences in the target-controlled infusion estimated concentration of propofol: bispectral index response curves.

Authors:  Ashraf A Dahaba; Taidi Zhong; Hui Shun Lu; Helmar Bornemann; Markus Liebmann; Georg Wilfinger; Gilbert Reibnegger; Helfried Metzler
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  The influence of method of administration and covariates on the pharmacokinetics of propofol in adult volunteers.

Authors:  T W Schnider; C F Minto; P L Gambus; C Andresen; D B Goodale; S L Shafer; E J Youngs
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 5.  Understanding the dose-effect relationship: clinical application of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models.

Authors:  N H Holford; L B Sheiner
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1981 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Effects of fentanyl, alfentanil, remifentanil and sufentanil on loss of consciousness and bispectral index during propofol induction of anaesthesia.

Authors:  C Lysakowski; L Dumont; M Pellegrini; F Clergue; E Tassonyi
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for propofol for broad application in anaesthesia and sedation.

Authors:  D J Eleveld; P Colin; A R Absalom; M M R F Struys
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Bispectral-index-guided versus clinically guided remifentanil/propofol analgesia/sedation for interventional radiological procedures: an observer-blinded randomized study.

Authors:  Ashraf A Dahaba; Ulrike Lischnig; Robert Kronthaler; Helmar Bornemann; Vassil Georgiev; Peter H Rehak; Helfried Metzler
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Activation of mu-opioid receptors excites a population of locus coeruleus-spinal neurons through presynaptic disinhibition.

Authors:  Yu-Zhen Pan; De-Pei Li; Shao-Rui Chen; Hui-Lin Pan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  In vivo assessment of intestinal, hepatic, and pulmonary first pass metabolism of propofol in the rat.

Authors:  A A Raoof; P F Augustijns; R K Verbeeck
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.