Literature DB >> 32100174

Use of a K-nearest neighbors model to predict the development of type 2 diabetes within 2 years in an obese, hypertensive population.

Rafael Garcia-Carretero1, Luis Vigil-Medina2, Inmaculada Mora-Jimenez3, Cristina Soguero-Ruiz3, Oscar Barquero-Perez3, Javier Ramos-Lopez3.   

Abstract

Prediabetes is a type of hyperglycemia in which patients have blood glucose levels above normal but below the threshold for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Prediabetic patients are considered to be at high risk for developing T2DM, but not all will eventually do so. Because it is difficult to identify which patients have an increased risk of developing T2DM, we developed a model of several clinical and laboratory features to predict the development of T2DM within a 2-year period. We used a supervised machine learning algorithm to identify at-risk patients from among 1647 obese, hypertensive patients. The study period began in 2005 and ended in 2018. We constrained data up to 2 years before the development of T2DM. Then, using a time series analysis with the features of every patient, we calculated one linear regression line and one slope per feature. Features were then included in a K-nearest neighbors classification model. Feature importance was assessed using the random forest algorithm. The K-nearest neighbors model accurately classified patients in 96% of cases, with a sensitivity of 99%, specificity of 78%, positive predictive value of 96%, and negative predictive value of 94%. The random forest algorithm selected the homeostatic model assessment-estimated insulin resistance, insulin levels, and body mass index as the most important factors, which in combination with KNN had an accuracy of 99% with a sensitivity of 99% and specificity of 97%. We built a prognostic model that accurately identified obese, hypertensive patients at risk for developing T2DM within a 2-year period. Clinicians may use machine learning approaches to better assess risk for T2DM and better manage hypertensive patients. Machine learning algorithms may help health care providers make more informed decisions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular risk assessment; K-nearest neighbors; Random forest; Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32100174     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-020-02132-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  24 in total

1.  Early Detection of Heart Failure Using Electronic Health Records: Practical Implications for Time Before Diagnosis, Data Diversity, Data Quantity, and Data Density.

Authors:  Kenney Ng; Steven R Steinhubl; Christopher deFilippi; Sanjoy Dey; Walter F Stewart
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2016-11-08

Review 2.  Insulin resistance. A multifaceted syndrome responsible for NIDDM, obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  R A DeFronzo; E Ferrannini
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Relative muscle mass is inversely associated with insulin resistance and prediabetes. Findings from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Preethi Srikanthan; Arun S Karlamangla
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 4.  Associations of vitamin D with insulin resistance, obesity, type 2 diabetes, and metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Sunil J Wimalawansa
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.292

5.  Lifestyle intervention for prevention of type 2 diabetes in primary health care: one-year follow-up of the Finnish National Diabetes Prevention Program (FIN-D2D).

Authors:  Timo Saaristo; Leena Moilanen; Eeva Korpi-Hyövälti; Mauno Vanhala; Juha Saltevo; Leo Niskanen; Jari Jokelainen; Markku Peltonen; Heikki Oksa; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Matti Uusitupa; Sirkka Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Prediction of incident diabetes mellitus in middle-aged adults: the Framingham Offspring Study.

Authors:  Peter W F Wilson; James B Meigs; Lisa Sullivan; Caroline S Fox; David M Nathan; Ralph B D'Agostino
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-05-28

7.  Predicting type 2 diabetes mellitus: a comparison between the FINDRISC score and the metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Abraham S Meijnikman; Christophe E M De Block; An Verrijken; Ilse Mertens; Luc F Van Gaal
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.320

8.  Driving Type 2 Diabetes Risk Scores into Clinical Practice: Performance Analysis in Hospital Settings.

Authors:  Antonio Martinez-Millana; María Argente-Pla; Bernardo Valdivieso Martinez; Vicente Traver Salcedo; Juan Francisco Merino-Torres
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Defining and characterizing the progression of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Vivian A Fonseca
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Predicting Diabetes Mellitus With Machine Learning Techniques.

Authors:  Quan Zou; Kaiyang Qu; Yamei Luo; Dehui Yin; Ying Ju; Hua Tang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 4.599

View more
  6 in total

1.  Predicting the Risk of Incident Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Chinese Elderly Using Machine Learning Techniques.

Authors:  Qing Liu; Miao Zhang; Yifeng He; Lei Zhang; Jingui Zou; Yaqiong Yan; Yan Guo
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-05-31

2.  Unraveling the Factors Determining Development of Type 2 Diabetes in Women With a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Through Machine-Learning Techniques.

Authors:  Ludovica Ilari; Agnese Piersanti; Christian Göbl; Laura Burattini; Alexandra Kautzky-Willer; Andrea Tura; Micaela Morettini
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 3.  Machine learning and deep learning predictive models for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Luis Fregoso-Aparicio; Julieta Noguez; Luis Montesinos; José A García-García
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.320

4.  Identification of Prediabetes Discussions in Unstructured Clinical Documentation: Validation of a Natural Language Processing Algorithm.

Authors:  Jessica L Schwartz; Eva Tseng; Nisa M Maruthur; Masoud Rouhizadeh
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2022-02-24

Review 5.  Machine learning for diabetes clinical decision support: a review.

Authors:  Ashwini Tuppad; Shantala Devi Patil
Journal:  Adv Comput Intell       Date:  2022-04-13

6.  Deep Learning Artificial Intelligence to Predict the Need for Tracheostomy in Patients of Deep Neck Infection Based on Clinical and Computed Tomography Findings-Preliminary Data and a Pilot Study.

Authors:  Shih-Lung Chen; Shy-Chyi Chin; Chia-Ying Ho
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.