Literature DB >> 32100165

In experienced hands, does the robotic platform impact operative efficiency? Comparison of the da Vinci Si versus Xi robot in colorectal surgery.

Ashley Hill1, James McCormick2.   

Abstract

Robotic surgical platforms have aimed to assist surgeons in meeting the challenges accompanying minimally invasive colon and rectal surgical procedures. Since early adoption over decade ago, there has been an evolution of the robotic platforms aimed at improved usability. We hypothesize, when compared to da Vinci Si, the Xi will allow for greater efficiency and result in shorter operative times. A case log review was completed for a single colorectal surgeon with 7 years' robotic experience, totaling over 800 cases. Patients were identified using CPT code S2900 (robot) for the most recent 15 months (January 2018-March 2019) contemporaneously at two tertiary care teaching hospitals; one equipped with the Si platform and the other with the Xi. A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing sigmoid colon resection or low anterior rectal resection (LAR) was completed. Categorical values were assessed using Fisher's exact test or Chi-square tests. Continuous data was compared using unpaired t test. 158 patients were identified as undergoing robotic major colonic surgical resection. A total of 93 patients underwent robotic sigmoid resection or LAR and were grouped based on the robotic platform used (Si, n = 52 vs. Xi, n = 41). The Xi group had significantly shorter surgical times for LAR and sigmoid resection, 162 vs 238 min (p = 0.0001). In the hands of an experienced surgeon, the da Vinci Xi system results in shorter operative times when performing sigmoid resection or LAR compared to older platforms. The da Vinci Xi may allow for improved efficiency as reflected by shorter operative times.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Learning curve; Rectal cancer; Robotic surgery; da Vinci Si; da Vinci Xi

Year:  2020        PMID: 32100165     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01055-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  4 in total

Review 1.  The art of robotic colonic resection: a review of progress in the past 5 years.

Authors:  Hongyi Liu; Maolin Xu; Rong Liu; Baoqing Jia; Zhiming Zhao
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-01-22

2.  Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted, left-sided colectomies: intra- and postoperative outcomes of 683 patients.

Authors:  Jörn-Markus Gass; Diana Daume; Fiorenzo Angehrn; Martin Bolli; Romano Schneider; Daniel Steinemann; Francesco Mongelli; Andreas Scheiwiller; Lana Fourie; Beatrice Kern; Markus von Flüe; Jürg Metzger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.453

3.  A comparison of the da Vinci Xi vs. da Vinci Si surgical systems for radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Kun-Yang Lei; Wen-Jie Xie; Sheng-Qiang Fu; Ming Ma; Ting Sun
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: propensity-matched analysis of the National Clinical Database in Japan.

Authors:  T Matsuyama; H Endo; H Yamamoto; I Takemasa; K Uehara; T Hanai; H Miyata; T Kimura; H Hasegawa; Y Kakeji; M Inomata; Y Kitagawa; Y Kinugasa
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-09-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.